The glaring evidence that Obamacare is a catastrophic FAILURE continues to mount

[PMZ]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

 

[P@triot]

That's an issue that the Constitution authorizes only the Supreme Court to judge. Is that news to you?

Ahahahahahaha! Game over sweetie! Please site for me the section of the U.S. Constitution where it states that the Supreme Court can "judge" what the federal government can or can't do it?

Once again...the facts prove you are WRONG!

Please site for me the section of the U.S. Constitution where it states that the you can "judge" what the federal government can or can't do it?

Still waiting for a response over here [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION]....

(You searching hard? Come on - it's a small little document libtard!)

 

[P@triot]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

None! And that's just it. You're the one who craves Cuba, but you won't leave and go experience your socialism first hand. I wonder why that is???

 

[PMZ]

Rotweiner is starting to froth at the mouth. That's what happens when people fall blindly for propaganda that they can't support.

Says the asshat getting owned with facts. You still haven't told me where in the U.S. Constitution that I can find where it says the the Supreme Court decides whether or not the people can be forced by the federal government to purchase a good or service.

Run liberal run! Change the topic! Use snarky remarks to cover up your ignorance when you can't answer basic questions!

Have an adult read the following to you.

The Court and Constitutional Interpretation - Supreme Court of the United States

 

[P@triot]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

My advice to you [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] is to stop being a brainwashed ideological serf and actually examine facts and evidence when presented to you.

Like the fact that 76,000 people were perfectly happy with their health insurance (or they would not have stayed with it) and Obamacare forced them to lose their coverage.

Oh, and by the way, what happened to Obama's "promise" of "if you like your coverage, you can keep your coverage"?

Another LIE that you will ignore and - in your panic - attempt to spin.

 

[PMZ]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

None! And that's just it. You're the one who craves Cuba, but you won't leave and go experience your socialism first hand. I wonder why that is???

As much as you hate this country and our government and our President and our Constitution and our people and our culture, and as loudly you whine about it, and now you say that there's none better.

I agree that there's none better.

 

[P@triot]

Rotweiner is starting to froth at the mouth. That's what happens when people fall blindly for propaganda that they can't support.

Says the asshat getting owned with facts. You still haven't told me where in the U.S. Constitution that I can find where it says the the Supreme Court decides whether or not the people can be forced by the federal government to purchase a good or service.

Run liberal run! Change the topic! Use snarky remarks to cover up your ignorance when you can't answer basic questions!

Have an adult read the following to you.

The Court and Constitutional Interpretation - Supreme Court of the United States

It's a very simple question [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] (even for a simpleton like you). What section of the Constitution can I find where it authorizes the Supreme Court to "only decide on whether or not the people can be forced to purchase a good or service". I didn't ask for a website under control of the Obama Administration. I'm asking for the ultimate evidence - the exact section of the Constitution where I can read it for myself.

You can't be this stupid, can you? I mean, you stated that was a fact. So surely you can show me the section of the Constitution which backs up your assertion here?

Unless.....of course....it doesn't exist

 

[P@triot]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

None! And that's just it. You're the one who craves Cuba, but you won't leave and go experience your socialism first hand. I wonder why that is???

As much as you hate this country and our government and our President and our Constitution and our people and our culture, and as loudly you whine about it, and now you say that there's none better.

I agree that there's none better.

Again, just as you blame Detroit for your Dumbocrat policies, you now blame me for hating the things YOU actually hate. You hate the Constitution. You hate freedom. You hate everything this country was built on. And yet you don't leave and go to beautiful Cuba where you can experience liberal utopia first hand.

There's only one thing you are correct on - I do hate the current president. But that's only because he hates America and the Constitution - trying to replace both with marxism.

 

[PMZ]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

My advice to you [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] is to stop being a brainwashed ideological serf and actually examine facts and evidence when presented to you.

Like the fact that 76,000 people were perfectly happy with their health insurance (or they would not have stayed with it) and Obamacare forced them to lose their coverage.

Oh, and by the way, what happened to Obama's "promise" of "if you like your coverage, you can keep your coverage"?

Another LIE that you will ignore and - in your panic - attempt to spin.

Apparently you interpreted his remarks, however he worded it, to mean that there would be no more changes to health insurance. That if you liked what you had, when he said it, it was yours forever. If you're happy thinking that, feel free. I would personally not consider that top shelf thinking but if you're happy with it, have at it.

 

[P@triot]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

None! And that's just it. You're the one who craves Cuba, but you won't leave and go experience your socialism first hand. I wonder why that is???

As much as you hate this country and our government and our President and our Constitution and our people and our culture, and as loudly you whine about it, and now you say that there's none better.

I agree that there's none better.

Another picture of Detroit - the city the Dumbocrats collapsed:

 

[PMZ]

None! And that's just it. You're the one who craves Cuba, but you won't leave and go experience your socialism first hand. I wonder why that is???

As much as you hate this country and our government and our President and our Constitution and our people and our culture, and as loudly you whine about it, and now you say that there's none better.

I agree that there's none better.

Again, just as you blame Detroit for your Dumbocrat policies, you now blame me for hating the things YOU actually hate. You hate the Constitution. You hate freedom. You hate everything this country was built on. And yet you don't leave and go to beautiful Cuba where you can experience liberal utopia first hand.

There's only one thing you are correct on - I do hate the current president. But that's only because he hates America and the Constitution - trying to replace both with marxism.

All of your posts are here for people to read. That's evidence enough for me.

 

[PMZ]

None! And that's just it. You're the one who craves Cuba, but you won't leave and go experience your socialism first hand. I wonder why that is???

As much as you hate this country and our government and our President and our Constitution and our people and our culture, and as loudly you whine about it, and now you say that there's none better.

I agree that there's none better.

Another picture of Detroit - the city the Dumbocrats collapsed:

I agree that Detroit has had some really bad Democrat mayors. If you think that that fact was the only cause of the cities demise, you've earned the title of conservative.

 

[P@triot]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

My advice to you [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] is to stop being a brainwashed ideological serf and actually examine facts and evidence when presented to you.

Like the fact that 76,000 people were perfectly happy with their health insurance (or they would not have stayed with it) and Obamacare forced them to lose their coverage.

Oh, and by the way, what happened to Obama's "promise" of "if you like your coverage, you can keep your coverage"?

Another LIE that you will ignore and - in your panic - attempt to spin.

Apparently you interpreted his remarks, however he worded it, to mean that there would be no more changes to health insurance. That if you liked what you had, when he said it, it was yours forever. If you're happy thinking that, feel free. I would personally not consider that top shelf thinking but if you're happy with it, have at it.

And there's the panic-stricken spin! I was waiting for it. Here's the video @PMZ... (I warn you, this is going to sting a bit):

[ame=http://youtu.be/wfl55GgHr5E]"If you like your plan, you can keep your plan." - Barack Obama - YouTube[/ame]

 

[dblack]

My advice to you Rotweiner is to make a list of all of the countries in the world that you believe have governments better than ours, and visit them. Who knows, you could be happy for once in your life.

My advice to you [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] is to stop being a brainwashed ideological serf and actually examine facts and evidence when presented to you.

Like the fact that 76,000 people were perfectly happy with their health insurance (or they would not have stayed with it) and Obamacare forced them to lose their coverage.

Oh, and by the way, what happened to Obama's "promise" of "if you like your coverage, you can keep your coverage"?

Another LIE that you will ignore and - in your panic - attempt to spin.

Apparently you interpreted his remarks, however he worded it, to mean that there would be no more changes to health insurance. That if you liked what you had, when he said it, it was yours forever. If you're happy thinking that, feel free. I would personally not consider that top shelf thinking but if you're happy with it, have at it.

It's too bad you're tacking so partisan here. Obama was directly addressing the fears of people who worried that new regulations would disqualify their existing insurance plans - which, for some people, is exactly what happened. If you're not willing to admit that was a flat out lie, then I'm not sure what would qualify.

 

[PMZ]

Says the asshat getting owned with facts. You still haven't told me where in the U.S. Constitution that I can find where it says the the Supreme Court decides whether or not the people can be forced by the federal government to purchase a good or service.

Run liberal run! Change the topic! Use snarky remarks to cover up your ignorance when you can't answer basic questions!

Have an adult read the following to you.

The Court and Constitutional Interpretation - Supreme Court of the United States

It's a very simple question [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] (even for a simpleton like you). What section of the Constitution can I find where it authorizes the Supreme Court to "only decide on whether or not the people can be forced to purchase a good or service". I didn't ask for a website under control of the Obama Administration. I'm asking for the ultimate evidence - the exact section of the Constitution where I can read it for myself.

You can't be this stupid, can you? I mean, you stated that was a fact. So surely you can show me the section of the Constitution which backs up your assertion here?

Unless.....of course....it doesn't exist

I guess you couldn't find an adult that could read? How are you going to learn that way?

 

[P@triot]

CareFirst says 76,000 customers will lose current coverage due to Obamacare | WashingtonExaminer.com



[ame=http://youtu.be/wfl55GgHr5E]"If you like your plan, you can keep your plan." - Barack Obama - YouTube[/ame]

 

[P@triot]

Have an adult read the following to you.

The Court and Constitutional Interpretation - Supreme Court of the United States

It's a very simple question [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] (even for a simpleton like you). What section of the Constitution can I find where it authorizes the Supreme Court to "only decide on whether or not the people can be forced to purchase a good or service". I didn't ask for a website under control of the Obama Administration. I'm asking for the ultimate evidence - the exact section of the Constitution where I can read it for myself.

You can't be this stupid, can you? I mean, you stated that was a fact. So surely you can show me the section of the Constitution which backs up your assertion here?

Unless.....of course....it doesn't exist

I guess you couldn't find an adult that could read? How are you going to learn that way?

Run liberal run!

I feel sorry for you, so I'll give you another chance. What section of the Constitution can I find where it verifies your assertion that the Supreme Court gets to decide whether or not the American people can be forced to purchase a good or service?

You do realize it makes you look REALLY bad every time you fail to give this simple answer.

 

[PMZ]

My advice to you [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] is to stop being a brainwashed ideological serf and actually examine facts and evidence when presented to you.

Like the fact that 76,000 people were perfectly happy with their health insurance (or they would not have stayed with it) and Obamacare forced them to lose their coverage.

Oh, and by the way, what happened to Obama's "promise" of "if you like your coverage, you can keep your coverage"?

Another LIE that you will ignore and - in your panic - attempt to spin.

Apparently you interpreted his remarks, however he worded it, to mean that there would be no more changes to health insurance. That if you liked what you had, when he said it, it was yours forever. If you're happy thinking that, feel free. I would personally not consider that top shelf thinking but if you're happy with it, have at it.

It's too bad you're tacking so partisan here. Obama was directly addressing the fears of people who worried that new regulations would disqualify their existing insurance plans - which, for some people, is exactly what happened. If you're not willing to admit that was a flat out lie, then I'm not sure what would qualify.

I'm partisan?????????? What are you????????

 

[PMZ]

It's a very simple question [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] (even for a simpleton like you). What section of the Constitution can I find where it authorizes the Supreme Court to "only decide on whether or not the people can be forced to purchase a good or service". I didn't ask for a website under control of the Obama Administration. I'm asking for the ultimate evidence - the exact section of the Constitution where I can read it for myself.

You can't be this stupid, can you? I mean, you stated that was a fact. So surely you can show me the section of the Constitution which backs up your assertion here?

Unless.....of course....it doesn't exist

I guess you couldn't find an adult that could read? How are you going to learn that way?

Run liberal run!

I feel sorry for you, so I'll give you another chance. What section of the Constitution can I find where it verifies your assertion that the Supreme Court gets to decide whether or not the American people can be forced to purchase a good or service?

You do realize it makes you look REALLY bad every time you fail to give this simple answer.

I gave you a golden opportunity to learn. You've turned it down. That is exactly what makes you a conservative.

 

[dblack]

Apparently you interpreted his remarks, however he worded it, to mean that there would be no more changes to health insurance. That if you liked what you had, when he said it, it was yours forever. If you're happy thinking that, feel free. I would personally not consider that top shelf thinking but if you're happy with it, have at it.

It's too bad you're tacking so partisan here. Obama was directly addressing the fears of people who worried that new regulations would disqualify their existing insurance plans - which, for some people, is exactly what happened. If you're not willing to admit that was a flat out lie, then I'm not sure what would qualify.

I'm partisan?????????? What are you????????

Not. Seriously, about the only defense that makes sense in this case is that anyone who bothered to read ACA, or even read a little about ACA, should have known he was lying. Most of us did. I suspect even most of his supporters did and just didn't care. And still don't, apparently.