The glaring evidence that Obamacare is a catastrophic FAILURE continues to mount

First of all stupid, we don't have a "democracy". Jesus - Antares even threw you a bone on this one and you still couldn't learn from it?!? :bang3:

You are not "we the people". You're the fringe minority radical that America hates.

"We the people" support and defend the U.S. Constitution while you cry about it like a little girl.

What do you call it when all citizens vote for their governmental representation? When all of their representation vote on laws? When the supreme court votes on adjudication? When juries vote?

""We the people" support and defend the U.S. Constitution". The only true thing that you've posted. We are not about to let the cult of conservatism change that. Ever.

Sweetie, you're so fuck'n stupid, you don't even understand that the U.S. Constitution is conservative. Everything about it. Limiting the power of government, maximizing the freedom of people.

It was built and designed to protect America from ignorant assholes like you...

We have always followed the Constitution exactly the way that it prescribed.
 
Well looky here. A badass. I was supporting a family when you were a gleam in your daddy's eye. You're just another cult member mistaking watching TV for thinking. Because you never had any experience thinking. You slept through the fifth grade and decided that seeing as you didn't learn anything then, you already knew everything.

Prime cult minion.

Supporting a family?!? You're a fuck'n parasite who can't even support your own conclusions! :lmao:

Can't wait to see your evidence!

I've filled this board with evidence - you just ignore it because you prefer your brainwashed ideology over facts.

Like the fact that the Dumbocrats had complete control over Detroit for 60 years and collapsed it with ignorant socialism - turning it into a 3rd world shit hole by punishing business with high taxes & regulations which chased them away.

Only an asshole like you could blame conservatives for Detroit when the Dumnocrats had complete control over it for 60 years. :lmao:

If America wants to know what your special form of stupidity will bring them, all we have to do is hold up pictures of Detroit...

detroit-house.jpg
 
''Conservatism is the more efficient means for people to accomplish that which they desire.''

If you are a predator, conservatism is efficient because it promotes helpless prey. Liberalism evens the playing field. You hate that.

Yeah cause the free market is helpless consumers buying goods from ruthless sellers. ROFL what an idiot. And you did industrial process improvement for a living? ROFL I'll be no one ever saved a dime taking advice from you.

You are not aware of any ruthless sellers? Ruthless as in make more money regardless of the cost to others?

You must not get out much.

Of course, regulation and competition constrains many of them. Without those forces, every business would be ruthless.

What do you think make more money regardless of the cost to others means?

We have regulations. We have competition. I know your old and all but jesus WTF is wrong with you?
 
Still waiting for an answer from [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] on this... :lol:

It exposes her ignorance and she knows it!

Some probably did numbnuts. Some probably went with the compliant policies CareFirst had to offer to replace the non compliant policies. This isn't rocket science but certainly seems well beyond you.

"It isn't rocket science" and yet your dumb-ass can only make up answers with "some probably did". :lmao:

We are talking about the 76,000 who clearly did not leave. You're now contradicting yourself (like typical idiot Dumbocrats always do).

Game over junior. You lose...

:dance:

You have the typical conservative attitude that whatever you want to be true, must be. It is fundamental to your ignorance. If you were liberal you'd spend more time on evidence and less time on bullshit. But, as a conservative you believe in bullshit. You thrive on it. You get a new load of it every time you're in the Lazy Boy.
 
What do you call it when all citizens vote for their governmental representation? When all of their representation vote on laws? When the supreme court votes on adjudication? When juries vote?

""We the people" support and defend the U.S. Constitution". The only true thing that you've posted. We are not about to let the cult of conservatism change that. Ever.

Sweetie, you're so fuck'n stupid, you don't even understand that the U.S. Constitution is conservative. Everything about it. Limiting the power of government, maximizing the freedom of people.

It was built and designed to protect America from ignorant assholes like you...

We have always followed the Constitution exactly the way that it prescribed.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Now you're taking your special kind of stupid to a whole new level.

Where does the Constitution give the federal government the power to force citizens to purchase a good or service? :eusa_whistle:
 
Yeah cause the free market is helpless consumers buying goods from ruthless sellers. ROFL what an idiot. And you did industrial process improvement for a living? ROFL I'll be no one ever saved a dime taking advice from you.

You are not aware of any ruthless sellers? Ruthless as in make more money regardless of the cost to others?

You must not get out much.

Of course, regulation and competition constrains many of them. Without those forces, every business would be ruthless.

What do you think make more money regardless of the cost to others means?

We have regulations. We have competition. I know your old and all but jesus WTF is wrong with you?

I knew you'd get it one of these days! Now you can stop peddling conservative bullshit that business doesn't need them.
 
Some probably did numbnuts. Some probably went with the compliant policies CareFirst had to offer to replace the non compliant policies. This isn't rocket science but certainly seems well beyond you.

"It isn't rocket science" and yet your dumb-ass can only make up answers with "some probably did". :lmao:

We are talking about the 76,000 who clearly did not leave. You're now contradicting yourself (like typical idiot Dumbocrats always do).

Game over junior. You lose...

:dance:

You have the typical conservative attitude that whatever you want to be true, must be. It is fundamental to your ignorance. If you were liberal you'd spend more time on evidence and less time on bullshit. But, as a conservative you believe in bullshit. You thrive on it. You get a new load of it every time you're in the Lazy Boy.

I'm the one providing the EVIDENCE asshole and you're the one ignoring it! There were 76,000 people who were still customers of this company until Obamacare ruined it for them.

Like a typical liberal, you eschewed facts and made up a story to cover for your failed liberal policy. You claimed these results were because the company was "now forced to provide what they SHOULD have provided all along". That's when I pointed out the flaw in your pathetic "logic" that they wouldn't have remained customers if they weren't receiving what they SHOULD.

Facts. Evidence. You ignore all of the reality in favor of your brainwashed little ideology. You serve your masters well serf.

Now tell us again how the United States is a "democracy"... :lmao:
 
Sweetie, you're so fuck'n stupid, you don't even understand that the U.S. Constitution is conservative. Everything about it. Limiting the power of government, maximizing the freedom of people.

It was built and designed to protect America from ignorant assholes like you...

We have always followed the Constitution exactly the way that it prescribed.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Now you're taking your special kind of stupid to a whole new level.

Where does the Constitution give the federal government the power to force citizens to purchase a good or service? :eusa_whistle:

That's an issue that the Constitution authorizes only the Supreme Court to judge. Is that news to you?
 
Yeah cause the free market is helpless consumers buying goods from ruthless sellers. ROFL what an idiot. And you did industrial process improvement for a living? ROFL I'll be no one ever saved a dime taking advice from you.

You are not aware of any ruthless sellers? Ruthless as in make more money regardless of the cost to others?

You must not get out much.

Of course, regulation and competition constrains many of them. Without those forces, every business would be ruthless.

What do you think make more money regardless of the cost to others means?

We have regulations. We have competition. I know your old and all but jesus WTF is wrong with you?

Yes - we have those things. But we don't have is a mechanism for parasites like [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] which allows her to legally confiscate what you earned and which rightfully belongs to you.

And that has her pissed. She's furious that the U.S. has freedom. She wants Cambodia where everyone starves to death but her fragile little psyche feels better about herself because we're all "equal" as we are brought down to her low class level.
 
"It isn't rocket science" and yet your dumb-ass can only make up answers with "some probably did". :lmao:

We are talking about the 76,000 who clearly did not leave. You're now contradicting yourself (like typical idiot Dumbocrats always do).

Game over junior. You lose...

:dance:

You have the typical conservative attitude that whatever you want to be true, must be. It is fundamental to your ignorance. If you were liberal you'd spend more time on evidence and less time on bullshit. But, as a conservative you believe in bullshit. You thrive on it. You get a new load of it every time you're in the Lazy Boy.

I'm the one providing the EVIDENCE asshole and you're the one ignoring it! There were 76,000 people who were still customers of this company until Obamacare ruined it for them.

Like a typical liberal, you eschewed facts and made up a story to cover for your failed liberal policy. You claimed these results were because the company was "now forced to provide what they SHOULD have provided all along". That's when I pointed out the flaw in your pathetic "logic" that they wouldn't have remained customers if they weren't receiving what they SHOULD.

Facts. Evidence. You ignore all of the reality in favor of your brainwashed little ideology. You serve your masters well serf.

Now tell us again how the United States is a "democracy"... :lmao:

The article that you posted didn't say that. It only said that the pre ACA policy was dropped. It had to be. It was no longer compliant with the law. Did you think that the law was going to exempt old policies?
 
We have always followed the Constitution exactly the way that it prescribed.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Now you're taking your special kind of stupid to a whole new level.

Where does the Constitution give the federal government the power to force citizens to purchase a good or service? :eusa_whistle:

That's an issue that the Constitution authorizes only the Supreme Court to judge. Is that news to you?

Ahahahahahaha! Game over sweetie! Please site for me the section of the U.S. Constitution where it states that the Supreme Court can "judge" what the federal government can or can't do it?

Once again...the facts prove you are WRONG!

:dance:
 
You are not aware of any ruthless sellers? Ruthless as in make more money regardless of the cost to others?

You must not get out much.

Of course, regulation and competition constrains many of them. Without those forces, every business would be ruthless.

What do you think make more money regardless of the cost to others means?

We have regulations. We have competition. I know your old and all but jesus WTF is wrong with you?

Yes - we have those things. But we don't have is a mechanism for parasites like [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] which allows her to legally confiscate what you earned and which rightfully belongs to you.

And that has her pissed. She's furious that the U.S. has freedom. She wants Cambodia where everyone starves to death but her fragile little psyche feels better about herself because we're all "equal" as we are brought down to her low class level.

Tell us about all of the countries in the world that have optional taxes.
 
You have the typical conservative attitude that whatever you want to be true, must be. It is fundamental to your ignorance. If you were liberal you'd spend more time on evidence and less time on bullshit. But, as a conservative you believe in bullshit. You thrive on it. You get a new load of it every time you're in the Lazy Boy.

I'm the one providing the EVIDENCE asshole and you're the one ignoring it! There were 76,000 people who were still customers of this company until Obamacare ruined it for them.

Like a typical liberal, you eschewed facts and made up a story to cover for your failed liberal policy. You claimed these results were because the company was "now forced to provide what they SHOULD have provided all along". That's when I pointed out the flaw in your pathetic "logic" that they wouldn't have remained customers if they weren't receiving what they SHOULD.

Facts. Evidence. You ignore all of the reality in favor of your brainwashed little ideology. You serve your masters well serf.

Now tell us again how the United States is a "democracy"... :lmao:

The article that you posted didn't say that. It only said that the pre ACA policy was dropped. It had to be. It was no longer compliant with the law. Did you think that the law was going to exempt old policies?

Why would Obamacare declare any policies "old" and void when Obama claimed the point of Obamacare was to ensure Americans had coverage?!!

Only liberal "logic" would create a law to ensure Americans have health insurance by voiding existing policies and forcing people to lose them... :eusa_doh:
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Now you're taking your special kind of stupid to a whole new level.

Where does the Constitution give the federal government the power to force citizens to purchase a good or service? :eusa_whistle:

That's an issue that the Constitution authorizes only the Supreme Court to judge. Is that news to you?

Ahahahahahaha! Game over sweetie! Please site for me the section of the U.S. Constitution where it states that the Supreme Court can "judge" what the federal government can or can't do it?

Once again...the facts prove you are WRONG!

:dance:

Please site for me the section of the U.S. Constitution where it states that the you can "judge" what the federal government can or can't do it?
 
I'm the one providing the EVIDENCE asshole and you're the one ignoring it! There were 76,000 people who were still customers of this company until Obamacare ruined it for them.

Like a typical liberal, you eschewed facts and made up a story to cover for your failed liberal policy. You claimed these results were because the company was "now forced to provide what they SHOULD have provided all along". That's when I pointed out the flaw in your pathetic "logic" that they wouldn't have remained customers if they weren't receiving what they SHOULD.

Facts. Evidence. You ignore all of the reality in favor of your brainwashed little ideology. You serve your masters well serf.

Now tell us again how the United States is a "democracy"... :lmao:

The article that you posted didn't say that. It only said that the pre ACA policy was dropped. It had to be. It was no longer compliant with the law. Did you think that the law was going to exempt old policies?

Why would Obamacare declare any policies "old" and void when Obama claimed the point of Obamacare was to ensure Americans had coverage?!!

Only liberal "logic" would create a law to ensure Americans have health insurance by voiding existing policies and forcing people to lose them... :eusa_doh:

Only conservative non-thinking would ignore ADEQUATE coverage.
 
We have regulations. We have competition. I know your old and all but jesus WTF is wrong with you?

Yes - we have those things. But we don't have is a mechanism for parasites like [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] which allows her to legally confiscate what you earned and which rightfully belongs to you.

And that has her pissed. She's furious that the U.S. has freedom. She wants Cambodia where everyone starves to death but her fragile little psyche feels better about herself because we're all "equal" as we are brought down to her low class level.

Tell us about all of the countries in the world that have optional taxes.

I don't have a problem with Constitutional taxes (ie taxes used to run the 18 enumerated powers of the federal government explicitly described in the U.S. Constitution). Healthcare is not one of them sweetie. Neither is welfare. Neither is Social Security. Neither is ANY of the redistribution of wealth socialist entitlements.
 
Rotweiner is starting to froth at the mouth. That's what happens when people fall blindly for propaganda that they can't support.
 
Yes - we have those things. But we don't have is a mechanism for parasites like [MENTION=43872]PMZ[/MENTION] which allows her to legally confiscate what you earned and which rightfully belongs to you.

And that has her pissed. She's furious that the U.S. has freedom. She wants Cambodia where everyone starves to death but her fragile little psyche feels better about herself because we're all "equal" as we are brought down to her low class level.

Tell us about all of the countries in the world that have optional taxes.

I don't have a problem with Constitutional taxes (ie taxes used to run the 18 enumerated powers of the federal government explicitly described in the U.S. Constitution). Healthcare is not one of them sweetie. Neither is welfare. Neither is Social Security. Neither is ANY of the redistribution of wealth socialist entitlements.

You say it doesn't. The Supreme Court says it does. I think that you ought to sue. You know, like Republicans did about ACA.
 
The article that you posted didn't say that. It only said that the pre ACA policy was dropped. It had to be. It was no longer compliant with the law. Did you think that the law was going to exempt old policies?

Why would Obamacare declare any policies "old" and void when Obama claimed the point of Obamacare was to ensure Americans had coverage?!!

Only liberal "logic" would create a law to ensure Americans have health insurance by voiding existing policies and forcing people to lose them... :eusa_doh:

Only conservative non-thinking would ignore ADEQUATE coverage.

Really Sally? And who decides what is "adequate"? Obama? You? Some unelected bureaucrat in Washington? :eusa_doh:
 
Rotweiner is starting to froth at the mouth. That's what happens when people fall blindly for propaganda that they can't support.

Says the asshat getting owned with facts. You still haven't told me where in the U.S. Constitution that I can find where it says the the Supreme Court decides whether or not the people can be forced by the federal government to purchase a good or service.

Run liberal run! Change the topic! Use snarky remarks to cover up your ignorance when you can't answer basic questions! :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top