The GOP has a stable of potential winners, the Dems have one old mare

[kaz]

Still, the same old platform of "let him die" and "the poor are lazy".

Who are you quoting? The voices in your head?

 

[rightwinger]

"The GOP has a stable of potential winners, the Dems have one old mare"

It's this sort of partisan delusional nonsense that will lose the GOP the presidency.

Again.

It comes from living in the rightwing Echo chamber

Everyone tells you the same thing

 

[rightwinger]

Oh no! Not the cover up ploy!
sure sign of makin' shit up!
And The repubs picked a ptsd ridden vet and an a incredible stupid evangelical
it's not the dems judgment that's questionable.

Oh, you were doing so well until that last statement. Before the angry black man who's an empty suit in the white house, John Kerry? Are you kidding me? He was a gag candidate. Al Gore is a lunatic who says more stupid things than Dan Quayle did. Before that was your two election love of the sexual predator who caught a break by being on the good side of the internet bubble which had zero to do with him. Tsongas? Mondale? Carter? LOL, that's picking well? yeah

You'll get an anurisim yammering like that.

I know Obama is a deity, I was just kidding saying he wasn't

Tragic failed attempt at sarcasm.

I'll let you in on the trick to effective sarcasm. You have to say something you don't normally say. Cool, huh? Now go give it a shot

As usual, you are right

 

[Wildman]

virtually every poll conducted has Clinton ahead

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

but now a Bubba endorsed contender is in this race, six months from now most people will be saying Hitlery who ??

 

[Skylar]

virtually every poll conducted has Clinton ahead

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

So Cruz isn't running? Walker isn't running? No one from the GOP is running? Because she beats them all in the poll.

Oh, and fellas.....you're gonna need women voters. Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

 

[rightwinger]

virtually every poll conducted has Clinton ahead

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

So Cruz isn't running? Walker isn't running? No one from the GOP is running? Because she beats them all in the poll.

Oh, and fellas.....you're gonna need women voters. Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

Republicans just don't get it...

While no candidate will make personal insults against Hillary, they think that if they sit back and allow the rightwing media to do ort for them, they are safe

Women, may or may not support Hillary. But turn her into a victim of unfair political rhetoric and they will flock to her defense

 

[Auld Phart]

virtually every poll conducted has Clinton ahead

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

So Cruz isn't running? Walker isn't running? No one from the GOP is running? Because she beats them all in the poll.

Oh, and fellas.....you're gonna need women voters. Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

People are going to vote for Hillary just because she's a woman?

Yep, that's the dem mindset.

They voted for Obama twice just because he's black.

 

[kaz]

Oh, you were doing so well until that last statement. Before the angry black man who's an empty suit in the white house, John Kerry? Are you kidding me? He was a gag candidate. Al Gore is a lunatic who says more stupid things than Dan Quayle did. Before that was your two election love of the sexual predator who caught a break by being on the good side of the internet bubble which had zero to do with him. Tsongas? Mondale? Carter? LOL, that's picking well? yeah

You'll get an anurisim yammering like that.

I know Obama is a deity, I was just kidding saying he wasn't

Tragic failed attempt at sarcasm.

I'll let you in on the trick to effective sarcasm. You have to say something you don't normally say. Cool, huh? Now go give it a shot

As usual, you are right

See daws, that's how you do it!

 

[rightwinger]

virtually every poll conducted has Clinton ahead

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

So Cruz isn't running? Walker isn't running? No one from the GOP is running? Because she beats them all in the poll.

Oh, and fellas.....you're gonna need women voters. Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

People are going to vote for Hillary just because she's a woman?

Yep, that's the dem mindset.

They voted for Obama twice just because he's black.

People will generally not vote for Hillary because she is a woman....but some will

Obama got 55% of the women's vote. If Hillary can get just 5% more because of women wanting to see a woman President, she can't be beaten

Republican opposition to women's issues will not help them

 

[Wildman]

Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

i sure would like to see you prove that, i have talked to several women i know and NOT one of them likes the OLD SOW.

 

[Wildman]

...the rightwing media...

could you please post a few "rightwing media" sites/links, i have searched and find none, oooooh, BTW do not refer to Foxnews.com, they are too much middle of the road for me.

 

[Skylar]

virtually every poll conducted has Clinton ahead

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

So Cruz isn't running? Walker isn't running? No one from the GOP is running? Because she beats them all in the poll.

Oh, and fellas.....you're gonna need women voters. Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

People are going to vote for Hillary just because she's a woman?

Wow. That's your paraphrase?

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

Yep, that's the dem mindset.

Nope. that's your hapless paraphrase. Back in reality, if your ilk keep making sexist attacks on Hillary, you're going to alienate women voters who might have otherwise supported you. You guys might want to consider dialing back the 'old sow' like comments.

 

[rightwinger]

...the rightwing media...

could you please post a few "rightwing media" sites/links, i have searched and find none, oooooh, BTW do not refer to Foxnews.com, they are too much middle of the road for me.

Too funny

 

[rightwinger]

virtually every poll conducted has Clinton ahead

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

So Cruz isn't running? Walker isn't running? No one from the GOP is running? Because she beats them all in the poll.

Oh, and fellas.....you're gonna need women voters. Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

People are going to vote for Hillary just because she's a woman?

Wow. That's your paraphrase?

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

Yep, that's the dem mindset.

Nope. that's your hapless paraphrase. Back in reality, if your ilk keep making sexist attacks on Hillary, you're going to alienate women voters who might have otherwise supported you. You guys might want to consider dialing back the 'old sow' like comments.

Republicans got pounded in 2012 because of their poor showing with women and Hispanics

They have done nothing in four years to improve their standing

 

[Redfish]

virtually every poll conducted has Clinton ahead

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

So Cruz isn't running? Walker isn't running? No one from the GOP is running? Because she beats them all in the poll.

Oh, and fellas.....you're gonna need women voters. Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

People are going to vote for Hillary just because she's a woman?

Wow. That's your paraphrase?

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

Yep, that's the dem mindset.

Nope. that's your hapless paraphrase. Back in reality, if your ilk keep making sexist attacks on Hillary, you're going to alienate women voters who might have otherwise supported you. You guys might want to consider dialing back the 'old sow' like comments.

Republicans got pounded in 2012 because of their poor showing with women and Hispanics

They have done nothing in four years to improve their standing

then how do you explain how the dems got pounded in 2014? Did the women and hispanics see the light?

 

[rightwinger]

when there is only one old sow in any race, she usually is ahead.

So Cruz isn't running? Walker isn't running? No one from the GOP is running? Because she beats them all in the poll.

Oh, and fellas.....you're gonna need women voters. Calling Hillary an 'old sow' doesn't endear you to women in general.

People are going to vote for Hillary just because she's a woman?

Wow. That's your paraphrase?

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

Yep, that's the dem mindset.

Nope. that's your hapless paraphrase. Back in reality, if your ilk keep making sexist attacks on Hillary, you're going to alienate women voters who might have otherwise supported you. You guys might want to consider dialing back the 'old sow' like comments.

Republicans got pounded in 2012 because of their poor showing with women and Hispanics

They have done nothing in four years to improve their standing

then how do you explain how the dems got pounded in 2014? Did the women and hispanics see the light?

Because it had half the turnout of a presidential election

 

[rdean]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

Actually, Dems have a number of great potential candidates, but there is no sense in them running at this point, because Hillary is going to win the nomination. If she had chosen not to run, Dems would have several strong candidates.

Democrats are interchangeable, so from a policy standpoint it makes no difference who runs. But from a strategy standpoint, isn't it a bit risky to put all your eggs in one basket this far from the election? Particularly someone with the arrogance and trail of corruption as a Clinton?

Considering that Democrats are black, brown, white, rich, poor, gay, straight, religious, atheists, educated and uneducated, to say they are all the same is retarded beyond belief.

Republicans are 90% white and those whites come in two flavors, middle class to poor who vote white no matter what and rich and greedy rich who vote money first and white second no matter what.

Who has diversity is clear.

 

[rdean]

Certainly a lot less than the repubs.

Considering there are 20 Republican candidates to one, you may have a point.

Which of Hillary's lies do you believe? Benghazi? She has only one cell phone? She didn't know she need to use government e-mails? What about under fire in Bosnia, that was compelling.

Which ones do you believe?

Bengazi is/ was no lie.
as for the others there is no credible evidence proving them to be lies .
I will make my decision on the evidence, not bigoted rumors.

Okay, then I know how gullible you are thank you.

Nope thats you guys , anybody who voted for Reagan or Gw bush has proven beyond any doubt that they are without question suckers!

And those who vote for a Community Organizer are not? One that can't even produce birth records to prove his status? One that will not open information or talk about his school career?

One that exclaims his mentor is none other than a racist, come on now...

At least he showed us his tax records, right? Knowing where he worked, what he did and how much he made was kind of important. Except for those who voted "Mitt". Because we would have ended up in "Deep Mitt".

 

[Auld Phart]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

Actually, Dems have a number of great potential candidates, but there is no sense in them running at this point, because Hillary is going to win the nomination. If she had chosen not to run, Dems would have several strong candidates.

Democrats are interchangeable, so from a policy standpoint it makes no difference who runs. But from a strategy standpoint, isn't it a bit risky to put all your eggs in one basket this far from the election? Particularly someone with the arrogance and trail of corruption as a Clinton?

Considering that Democrats are black, brown, white, rich, poor, gay, straight, religious, atheists, educated and uneducated, to say they are all the same is retarded beyond belief.

Republicans are 90% white and those whites come in two flavors, middle class to poor who vote white no matter what and rich and greedy rich who vote money first and white second no matter what.

Who has diversity is clear.

Currently, your field has 2 white senior citizens, one male, one female, and a younger white male.

The pub field has 2 Hispanics, one woman, and a variety of white males, none of whom are near the age of applying for Social Security.

Yes, "who has diversity" is VERY clear.

 

[rightwinger]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

Actually, Dems have a number of great potential candidates, but there is no sense in them running at this point, because Hillary is going to win the nomination. If she had chosen not to run, Dems would have several strong candidates.

Democrats are interchangeable, so from a policy standpoint it makes no difference who runs. But from a strategy standpoint, isn't it a bit risky to put all your eggs in one basket this far from the election? Particularly someone with the arrogance and trail of corruption as a Clinton?

Considering that Democrats are black, brown, white, rich, poor, gay, straight, religious, atheists, educated and uneducated, to say they are all the same is retarded beyond belief.

Republicans are 90% white and those whites come in two flavors, middle class to poor who vote white no matter what and rich and greedy rich who vote money first and white second no matter what.

Who has diversity is clear.

Currently, your field has 2 white senior citizens, one male, one female, and a younger white male.

The pub field has 2 Hispanics, one woman, and a variety of white males, none of whom are near the age of applying for Social Security.

Yes, "who has diversity" is VERY clear.

The Democrats will run the first female for President in history. Republicans will run another white male

There is your diversity