The GOP has a stable of potential winners, the Dems have one old mare

[Redfish]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

Actually, Dems have a number of great potential candidates, but there is no sense in them running at this point, because Hillary is going to win the nomination. If she had chosen not to run, Dems would have several strong candidates.

Democrats are interchangeable, so from a policy standpoint it makes no difference who runs. But from a strategy standpoint, isn't it a bit risky to put all your eggs in one basket this far from the election? Particularly someone with the arrogance and trail of corruption as a Clinton?

Considering that Democrats are black, brown, white, rich, poor, gay, straight, religious, atheists, educated and uneducated, to say they are all the same is retarded beyond belief.

Republicans are 90% white and those whites come in two flavors, middle class to poor who vote white no matter what and rich and greedy rich who vote money first and white second no matter what.

Who has diversity is clear.

Currently, your field has 2 white senior citizens, one male, one female, and a younger white male.

The pub field has 2 Hispanics, one woman, and a variety of white males, none of whom are near the age of applying for Social Security.

Yes, "who has diversity" is VERY clear.

The Democrats will run the first female for President in history. Republicans will run another white male

There is your diversity

Do you honestly think that HRC is a good candidate who would be a good president? No one who knows anything about her could not possibly think that.

 

[Redfish]

Old and wise,
or young and foolish,
tis the question of the hour......

Hmmm, was that your line in 2008? I think not.

 

[Political Junky]

You forgot to mention, brain damaged.

Well, the Right had Reagan with Alzheimer's for 8 years.

 

[Redfish]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

Actually, Dems have a number of great potential candidates, but there is no sense in them running at this point, because Hillary is going to win the nomination. If she had chosen not to run, Dems would have several strong candidates.

Democrats are interchangeable, so from a policy standpoint it makes no difference who runs. But from a strategy standpoint, isn't it a bit risky to put all your eggs in one basket this far from the election? Particularly someone with the arrogance and trail of corruption as a Clinton?

Considering that Democrats are black, brown, white, rich, poor, gay, straight, religious, atheists, educated and uneducated, to say they are all the same is retarded beyond belief.

Republicans are 90% white and those whites come in two flavors, middle class to poor who vote white no matter what and rich and greedy rich who vote money first and white second no matter what.

Who has diversity is clear.

Currently, your field has 2 white senior citizens, one male, one female, and a younger white male.

The pub field has 2 Hispanics, one woman, and a variety of white males, none of whom are near the age of applying for Social Security.

Yes, "who has diversity" is VERY clear.

The Democrats will run the first female for President in history. Republicans will run another white male

There is your diversity

you are really trying, I will give you that. But your reality is that HRC is a very flawed candidate and a more flawed person. She and bubba are what america hates about the political class who think they rule by some kind of divine right.

 

[Redfish]

You forgot to mention, brain damaged.

Well, the Right had Reagan with Alzheimer's for 8 years.

only the last 2 and Nancy did a pretty good job during that time.

 

[daws101]

Democrats are interchangeable, so from a policy standpoint it makes no difference who runs. But from a strategy standpoint, isn't it a bit risky to put all your eggs in one basket this far from the election? Particularly someone with the arrogance and trail of corruption as a Clinton?

Considering that Democrats are black, brown, white, rich, poor, gay, straight, religious, atheists, educated and uneducated, to say they are all the same is retarded beyond belief.

Republicans are 90% white and those whites come in two flavors, middle class to poor who vote white no matter what and rich and greedy rich who vote money first and white second no matter what.

Who has diversity is clear.

Currently, your field has 2 white senior citizens, one male, one female, and a younger white male.

The pub field has 2 Hispanics, one woman, and a variety of white males, none of whom are near the age of applying for Social Security.

Yes, "who has diversity" is VERY clear.

The Democrats will run the first female for President in history. Republicans will run another white male

There is your diversity

It's the beauty of every Democrat agreeing on every issue for the same reason. You can go with the black or the woman or whatever you want since you don't expect candidates to think for themselves. In fact you demand they don't

Why is it you hate white people again?

Both Obama and Clinton have been very clear on their agenda. Just because you don't agree with that agenda does not mean they do not think for themselves

Now, for Republicans.....thinking for yourself means channelling Reagan from 35 years ago

which says a lot about the inability of the gop to be relevant.

 

[Redfish]

Considering that Democrats are black, brown, white, rich, poor, gay, straight, religious, atheists, educated and uneducated, to say they are all the same is retarded beyond belief.

Republicans are 90% white and those whites come in two flavors, middle class to poor who vote white no matter what and rich and greedy rich who vote money first and white second no matter what.

Who has diversity is clear.

Currently, your field has 2 white senior citizens, one male, one female, and a younger white male.

The pub field has 2 Hispanics, one woman, and a variety of white males, none of whom are near the age of applying for Social Security.

Yes, "who has diversity" is VERY clear.

The Democrats will run the first female for President in history. Republicans will run another white male

There is your diversity

It's the beauty of every Democrat agreeing on every issue for the same reason. You can go with the black or the woman or whatever you want since you don't expect candidates to think for themselves. In fact you demand they don't

Why is it you hate white people again?

Both Obama and Clinton have been very clear on their agenda. Just because you don't agree with that agenda does not mean they do not think for themselves

Now, for Republicans.....thinking for yourself means channelling Reagan from 35 years ago

which says a lot about the inability of the gop to be relevant.

continue your fantasy if it helps you sleep. obama, clinton, reid, and pelosi have destroyed the dem party for the next 20 or 30 years.

 

[kaz]

Nothing says 'thinking for yourself' like screaming RINO!

What does that have to do with anything anyone said?

Simple: the big tent party's tent is getting ideologically small. 'Purity tests' and thinking for yourself have very little to do with each other.

Says the guy from the party who agree on every position for the same reasons. Diversity of thought is far more valuable than diversity of skin color

Laughing...oh, obviously. As demonstrated by Warren's opposition to Obama on the trade deal. Because they agree on every issue. I don't think 'every' means what you think it means.

RINO typifies the 'purity tests' that is emblematic of the shrinking ideological tent of what used to be the 'big tent party'. And such purges don't speak to much free thinking.

The true RINOs are the arch conservatives who are unable to even win their parties nomination

Those are some big words for a little boy. How long did it take you to memorize that?

 

[daws101]

You forgot to mention, brain damaged.

Well, the Right had Reagan with Alzheimer's for 8 years.

only the last 2 and Nancy did a pretty good job during that time.

how's that? she was nearly as fucked up as Ronnie!

 

[kaz]

What does that have to do with anything anyone said?

Simple: the big tent party's tent is getting ideologically small. 'Purity tests' and thinking for yourself have very little to do with each other.

Says the guy from the party who agree on every position for the same reasons. Diversity of thought is far more valuable than diversity of skin color

Laughing...oh, obviously. As demonstrated by Warren's opposition to Obama on the trade deal. Because they agree on every issue. I don't think 'every' means what you think it means.

RINO typifies the 'purity tests' that is emblematic of the shrinking ideological tent of what used to be the 'big tent party'. And such purges don't speak to much free thinking.

The true RINOs are the arch conservatives who are unable to even win their parties nomination

Of course. Purity tests demonstrate an increasingly narrow minded set of requirements one must walk lock step in order to be a 'real conservative'. RINO is a 4 letter indictment of the concept of the 'big tent party'. And an elegant demonstration of how small a demographic they actually represent.

When you have to purge even fellow conservatives from your party.....you're not going to find more fertile ground among moderates or liberals.

Ask Joe Lieberman about purity tests

 

[BlackAsCoal]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

:0) Talk about amusing .. there isn't one single republican who can win an national office .. not ONE.

In case you haven't noticed, republicans don't have enough white voters to win the presidency.

How sad. :0)

 

[daws101]

It's the beauty of every Democrat agreeing on every issue for the same reason. You can go with the black or the woman or whatever you want since you don't expect candidates to think for themselves. In fact you demand they don't

Why is it you hate white people again?

Both Obama and Clinton have been very clear on their agenda. Just because you don't agree with that agenda does not mean they do not think for themselves

Now, for Republicans.....thinking for yourself means channelling Reagan from 35 years ago

Nothing says 'thinking for yourself' like screaming RINO!

What does that have to do with anything anyone said?

Simple: the big tent party's tent is getting ideologically small. 'Purity tests' and thinking for yourself have very little to do with each other.

Says the guy from the party who agree on every position for the same reasons. Diversity of thought is far more valuable than diversity of skin color

why do the words hokey and melodramatic come to mind?

 

[kaz]

Both Obama and Clinton have been very clear on their agenda. Just because you don't agree with that agenda does not mean they do not think for themselves

Now, for Republicans.....thinking for yourself means channelling Reagan from 35 years ago

Nothing says 'thinking for yourself' like screaming RINO!

What does that have to do with anything anyone said?

Simple: the big tent party's tent is getting ideologically small. 'Purity tests' and thinking for yourself have very little to do with each other.

Says the guy from the party who agree on every position for the same reasons. Diversity of thought is far more valuable than diversity of skin color

why do the words hokey and melodramatic come to mind?

Programming?

 

[daws101]

Currently, your field has 2 white senior citizens, one male, one female, and a younger white male.

The pub field has 2 Hispanics, one woman, and a variety of white males, none of whom are near the age of applying for Social Security.

Yes, "who has diversity" is VERY clear.

The Democrats will run the first female for President in history. Republicans will run another white male

There is your diversity

It's the beauty of every Democrat agreeing on every issue for the same reason. You can go with the black or the woman or whatever you want since you don't expect candidates to think for themselves. In fact you demand they don't

Why is it you hate white people again?

Both Obama and Clinton have been very clear on their agenda. Just because you don't agree with that agenda does not mean they do not think for themselves

Now, for Republicans.....thinking for yourself means channelling Reagan from 35 years ago

which says a lot about the inability of the gop to be relevant.

continue your fantasy if it helps you sleep. obama, clinton, reid, and pelosi have destroyed the dem party for the next 20 or 30 years.

in your fantasy yes but in reality no.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

:0) Talk about amusing .. there isn't one single republican who can win an national office .. not ONE.

In case you haven't noticed, republicans don't have enough white voters to win the presidency.

How sad. :0)

They seemed to have enough in Nov 2014

 

[rightwinger]

Actually, Dems have a number of great potential candidates, but there is no sense in them running at this point, because Hillary is going to win the nomination. If she had chosen not to run, Dems would have several strong candidates.

Democrats are interchangeable, so from a policy standpoint it makes no difference who runs. But from a strategy standpoint, isn't it a bit risky to put all your eggs in one basket this far from the election? Particularly someone with the arrogance and trail of corruption as a Clinton?

Considering that Democrats are black, brown, white, rich, poor, gay, straight, religious, atheists, educated and uneducated, to say they are all the same is retarded beyond belief.

Republicans are 90% white and those whites come in two flavors, middle class to poor who vote white no matter what and rich and greedy rich who vote money first and white second no matter what.

Who has diversity is clear.

Currently, your field has 2 white senior citizens, one male, one female, and a younger white male.

The pub field has 2 Hispanics, one woman, and a variety of white males, none of whom are near the age of applying for Social Security.

Yes, "who has diversity" is VERY clear.

The Democrats will run the first female for President in history. Republicans will run another white male

There is your diversity

Do you honestly think that HRC is a good candidate who would be a good president? No one who knows anything about her could not possibly think that.

Absolutely

Hillary is by far the most qualified and is respected around the world. Most of the world fears Americas Republicans because they are so impulsive and short sighted

 

[daws101]

What does that have to do with anything anyone said?

Simple: the big tent party's tent is getting ideologically small. 'Purity tests' and thinking for yourself have very little to do with each other.

Says the guy from the party who agree on every position for the same reasons. Diversity of thought is far more valuable than diversity of skin color

Laughing...oh, obviously. As demonstrated by Warren's opposition to Obama on the trade deal. Because they agree on every issue. I don't think 'every' means what you think it means.

RINO typifies the 'purity tests' that is emblematic of the shrinking ideological tent of what used to be the 'big tent party'. And such purges don't speak to much free thinking.

The true RINOs are the arch conservatives who are unable to even win their parties nomination

Those are some big words for a little boy. How long did it take you to memorize that?

a catastrophe of sarcasm.

 

[BlackAsCoal]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

:0) Talk about amusing .. there isn't one single republican who can win an national office .. not ONE.

In case you haven't noticed, republicans don't have enough white voters to win the presidency.

How sad. :0)

They seemed to have enough in Nov 2014

In case you haven't noticed, republicans don't have enough white voters to win the presidency

They didn't have enough in 2008 .. didn't have enough in 2012 .. won't have enough in 2016 .. and beyond into the near future.

 

[daws101]

Nothing says 'thinking for yourself' like screaming RINO!

What does that have to do with anything anyone said?

Simple: the big tent party's tent is getting ideologically small. 'Purity tests' and thinking for yourself have very little to do with each other.

Says the guy from the party who agree on every position for the same reasons. Diversity of thought is far more valuable than diversity of skin color

why do the words hokey and melodramatic come to mind?

Programming?

as always that's all you....

 

[daws101]

Its very amusing to watch the dims twist and turn trying to justify running the old, tired, lying, corrupt, failed bitch HRC. But she is all they have, they have no one else. Its hilarious.

:0) Talk about amusing .. there isn't one single republican who can win an national office .. not ONE.

In case you haven't noticed, republicans don't have enough white voters to win the presidency.

How sad. :0)

They seemed to have enough in Nov 2014

not really ....