Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But even if the marriage equality crowd were not winning the popular opinion as it is, Jacksonian democratic majority does not govern civil rights.
The rest of America will not be governed by a hateful narrow-minded small minority from the far right.
Sorry. You don't get to make up rights because people aren't voting for your agenda. The fact you have to push your agenda on everyone through black robed tyrants says that you.
The fact that you consider judges to be 'black robed tyrants' just is one more example of how much you despise our Constitution.
But even if the marriage equality crowd were not winning the popular opinion as it is, Jacksonian democratic majority does not govern civil rights.
The rest of America will not be governed by a hateful narrow-minded small minority from the far right.
Sorry. You don't get to make up rights because people aren't voting for your agenda. The fact you have to push your agenda on everyone through black robed tyrants says that you admit you're imposing your morality on Americans under the guise of "civil rights".
And isn't it you Leftwats who are always telling us not to impose our beliefs on others?
So like I said on the OP, on behalf of the American People, the U.S. Constitution, and all decency.....
Fuck you.
St.Mike - I dunno if you're role playing or not ... if U R ... I like your style - good schtick - if not I still like your style
Are you laughing because you can almost taste being a one-trick pony?
I'm laughing because Left-think is the perspective of the irrationally subjective female, thus as with all comedy, it's funny, because it's true.
So you are highly concerned with subjective females. Says a lot about you.
Does it?
LOL! OK...
Pray tell, what does it say?
You couldn't take it.
So... Ya got nuttin'?
Color me SHOCKED!
I'm laughing because Left-think is the perspective of the irrationally subjective female, thus as with all comedy, it's funny, because it's true.
So you are highly concerned with subjective females. Says a lot about you.
Does it?
LOL! OK...
Pray tell, what does it say?
You couldn't take it.
So... Ya got nuttin'?
Color me SHOCKED!
I would most definitely color you yellow.
Redfish's meaningless babble. Marriage Equality is almost here. There is no homosexual dilemma at all.It's hard to believe those numbers when California voters approved of a ban on gay marriage by popular referendum. When it was struck down in court, they passed another referendum adding a ban to gay marriage to the California constitution. Yeah, Blue State California. Compare this to New York who pulled some shady tricks to pass gay marriage in the middle of the night before any opposition could be mounted to it. And that was the legislature, not a popular movement, so they can hardly be seen as representing the people in doing that. When it comes to the laws that are backed by popular support, gay marriage is trumped by those who want to preserve what real marriage is.
You're just providing an excellent example of why we don't vote on people's civil rights. Loving v Virginia was in 1967.
no matter how many times you say it, race and sexual orientation are not the same.
but since you brought up race, are the following races: hispanic, asian, arab, latino ? Answer: No.
second question: would you support an affirmative action law for gays?
just trying to see where you really are on this.
Redfish's meaningless babble. Marriage Equality is almost here. There is no homosexual dilemma at all.It's hard to believe those numbers when California voters approved of a ban on gay marriage by popular referendum. When it was struck down in court, they passed another referendum adding a ban to gay marriage to the California constitution. Yeah, Blue State California. Compare this to New York who pulled some shady tricks to pass gay marriage in the middle of the night before any opposition could be mounted to it. And that was the legislature, not a popular movement, so they can hardly be seen as representing the people in doing that. When it comes to the laws that are backed by popular support, gay marriage is trumped by those who want to preserve what real marriage is.
You're just providing an excellent example of why we don't vote on people's civil rights. Loving v Virginia was in 1967.
no matter how many times you say it, race and sexual orientation are not the same.
but since you brought up race, are the following races: hispanic, asian, arab, latino ? Answer: No.
second question: would you support an affirmative action law for gays?
just trying to see where you really are on this.
stmike's been this, done that on the net, he is the real deal. So he says. No, he is not, and obviously no one can trust him. He is out only for himself.
Once again, stmike, you suffer no harm from marriage equality, none.
stmike's been this, done that on the net, he is the real deal. So he says. No, he is not, and obviously no one can trust him. He is out only for himself.
Once again, stmike, you suffer no harm from marriage equality, none.
Your misdefinition of marriage equality is meaningless to the growing majority of Americans, the same as racial discrimination and segregation fifty and sixty years ago.
Your misdefinition of marriage equality is meaningless to the growing majority of Americans, the same as racial discrimination and segregation fifty and sixty years ago.
You are entirely wrong. They are gay like you are not, in nearly all cases. Only a few make a conscious choice. The science, and human history, is clear but your ideology is junk.Your misdefinition of marriage equality is meaningless to the growing majority of Americans, the same as racial discrimination and segregation fifty and sixty years ago.
being black is a normal human condition. being homosexual is not.
Sorry to have to be the one to tell you this Chief Sellout, but people are born black, and white, and gay, and straight, and smart and stupid. That's just life on this rock.Your misdefinition of marriage equality is meaningless to the growing majority of Americans, the same as racial discrimination and segregation fifty and sixty years ago.
race has nothing to do with lifestyle choice. Screaming that it does over and over doesn't change that fact. People can be judged by how they choose to live and should. Often.
Reality is not to their liking, and never has been.Discrimination against race in law remains pertinent as does exclusion of marriage equality.
That the far right social cons do not accept such is risible.
Yes it is. They need to move to Jesusland since this nation is not for them.Marriage Equality is here to stay.
