Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 17,721
- 19,635
- 2,288
It's a N'gunt!It's a Bingo!![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a N'gunt!It's a Bingo!![]()
I believe we are rendered to simply poke at the bubble for a bit, my friend.Actually, no it doesn't.
You exist in a fantasy world. I can't help you.
Don’t waste your time. That guy is a leftist zealot and never actually addresses the issues pointIt's a N'gunt!
I like to practice clown juggling in my downtime. You are correct, though. That bozo barely comprehends the English he struggles to wield.Don’t waste your time. That guy is a leftist zealot and never actually addresses the issues point
It can be proven policy was enacted as a direct result of that relationship, how do you not know that?What would "selling access to his father" look like?
Does that mean someone pays him money, and in return gets a meeting (or more) from Joe? Is that enough to be a crime? Does it have to be proven that Joe did something based on this relationship?
Yep, that's the claim, like the other claims I've seen you folks post from Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit. Lots of reports and blockbusters and WE GOT HIM NOW.It can be proven policy was enacted as a direct result of that relationship, how do you not know that?
We're existing within an insane duality right now.I believe we are rendered to simply poke at the bubble for a bit, my friend.Magaturds are in full diversion mode these days with all the indictments. It's cool. I'm at peace with it. Unless orange dipshit sees a graybar hotel remains to be seen. But I guarantee it will be entertaining as fuck.
![]()
WrongMcDonnell v. United States - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
McDonnell was taking tons of gifts from a wealthy “friend” and in exchange hooking him up with meetings all over his government. That didn’t constitute an official act and therefore was not bribery. His conviction was vacated.
Bribery requires an official act. You could pay Hunter Biden a million dollars to get in the same room as Joe Biden, explicitly, and that would be perfectly legal.
Says the guy who thinks encouragement is the same as a question! And is now too pussy to explain what is morally abhorrent about two adults having consensual sex and where these supposed moral standards come from.I like to practice clown juggling in my downtime. You are correct, though. That bozo barely comprehends the English he struggles to wield.
What star witness? I am simply using common sense. I am so confident about this that I would bet my life and my kids lives that this was 100% pay for play and Joe Biden benefitted financially from it.
Yep, that's the claim, like the other claims I've seen you folks post from Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit. Lots of reports and blockbusters and WE GOT HIM NOW.
SO GET TO IT. If he broke a law, just prove it in the light of day, and we nail him. "In the light of day" means "also hearing the other side of the story in an official proceeding."
Easy peasy. And don't worry, I don't expect you folks to say the same about Trump.
As always, I'm more than happy to wait for the trial. I always want to hear both sides of a story.
^This is all documented facts, Maccy.
Mac, you're so stupid you don't realize the foxes are guarding the henhouse.
It's not like you're untelligent, I think your TDS blocks you from seeing reality.
WTF are you ranting about?? The Bidenfluffer asked what selling access to his father would look like. I explained it to him, with public evidence.False equivalence. Whataboutism. Shaky narrative. Pick a card, idiot. You're out of fucking gas. No one's buying your fake outrage here outside of your cult. This is a fucking football game for you, and I expect no less from you.![]()
Go ahead, keep making yourself look the fool as you carry water for a guy who fucked his dead brother's widow, acting as if it's nothing more than "two consenting adults". One can always tell a desperate buffoon by the way they resort to bold text in their responses. You are the poster child for useful idiots nationwide, coward.Says the guy who thinks encouragement is the same as a question! And is now too pussy to explain what is morally abhorrent about two adults having consensual sex and where these supposed moral standards come from.![]()
Who's desperate?Go ahead, keep making yourself look the fool as you carry water for a guy who fucked his dead brother's widow, acting as if it's nothing more than "two consenting adults". One can always tell a desperate buffoon by the way they resort to bold text in their responses. You are the poster child for useful idiots nationwide, coward.
You, obviously.Who's desperate?![]()
I'm under no obligation to explain the obvious to low IQ useful idiots, coward.I've been patiently waiting for you to explain to me what's wrong about two consenting adults having sex and still you're too much of a coward to explain it to me.
You're low hanging fruit not worth the effort.Is that the best you can do?
Pathetic.
You never answered my question. One way conversations are boring.You are missing two key elements of pay for play……the pay and the play
You can’t show ANY money going to President Biden or any wealth he can’t account for
You can’t show any official actions by Biden that would help Hunters business partners