Mostly, Bribery, Treason, and other High Crimes and Misdemeanors are not what removal from office is all about. The meaning is shown in Federalist 65, explaining the Impeachment concept to the voters: "' . . . . Those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.'”
An arrest and conviction is not what is meant. Meeting with Putin in light of the indictment of 12 Russian generals, acting as spies, in that High Command--for meddling in the 2016 election directly and electronically: Is what that is about.
There is a concept of violation of public trust, not just changing the recital of events every few minutes, or even so(?)!
The meaning arises from what it meant at the time, which can be clearly referenced.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Charging usury to non-believers is just OK, but only as the "Moses Atrocity!" There is no apparent record of anyone knowing what it meant until New Testament, Matthew 25:14-30, 1500 or more years later. Even that was mainly after attempting to drown various people at the riverside, for example(?)! At least supportive of it, many would say: Maybe religious-based drowning was widely unknown at the time, there being no war even known in the world at the time(?)!)
An arrest and conviction is not what is meant. Meeting with Putin in light of the indictment of 12 Russian generals, acting as spies, in that High Command--for meddling in the 2016 election directly and electronically: Is what that is about.
There is a concept of violation of public trust, not just changing the recital of events every few minutes, or even so(?)!
The meaning arises from what it meant at the time, which can be clearly referenced.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Charging usury to non-believers is just OK, but only as the "Moses Atrocity!" There is no apparent record of anyone knowing what it meant until New Testament, Matthew 25:14-30, 1500 or more years later. Even that was mainly after attempting to drown various people at the riverside, for example(?)! At least supportive of it, many would say: Maybe religious-based drowning was widely unknown at the time, there being no war even known in the world at the time(?)!)
