Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you are just parroting the idea promoted by obama and his street thugs at Black Lies Matter which claim that cops are racists who just pick on black peopleIt's a fact that a black person is more likely to get arrested and serve time for a crime than whites who commit the same crime.
no I am actually stating facts from actual research.you are just parroting the idea promoted by obama and his street thugs at Black Lies Matter which claim that cops are racists who just pick on black peopleIt's a fact that a black person is more likely to get arrested and serve time for a crime than whites who commit the same crime.
but the rest of America knows thats nonsense
blacks get arrested more because they commit more crimes
its as simple as that
www.channel4.com
www.channel4.com
abcnews.go.com
Very true. It's because of the behavior of black defendants. They are far more likely to act out in the courtroom. A white will stand respectfully, apologize and take responsibility. Blacks blame racism. A white cooperates with the attorney. A black treats the attorney as the enemy. They are amused at the lengths attorneys try to go with no client representation at all.no there are just laws that are applied more to blacks than to whites.There are no anti black laws anywhere in AmericaWhites control the lawmaking and policymaking bodies in this country.
It's a fact that a black person is more likely to get arrested and serve time for a crime than whites who commit the same crime.
Therr are no moreVery true. It's because of the behavior of black defendants. They are far more likely to act out in the courtroom. A white will stand respectfully, apologize and take responsibility. Blacks blame racism. A white cooperates with the attorney. A black treats the attorney as the enemy. They are amused at the lengths attorneys try to go with no client representation at all.no there are just laws that are applied more to blacks than to whites.There are no anti black laws anywhere in AmericaWhites control the lawmaking and policymaking bodies in this country.
It's a fact that a black person is more likely to get arrested and serve time for a crime than whites who commit the same crime.
An innocent black can railroad themselves into prison.
Those are not factsno I am actually stating facts from actual research.you are just parroting the idea promoted by obama and his street thugs at Black Lies Matter which claim that cops are racists who just pick on black peopleIt's a fact that a black person is more likely to get arrested and serve time for a crime than whites who commit the same crime.
but the rest of America knows thats nonsense
blacks get arrested more because they commit more crimes
its as simple as that
FactCheck: do black criminals get harsher sentences for the same crimes?
Analysis that shows ethnic minority criminals are 240% more likely to be jailed for drug offences cannot exclude the possibility that the BAME offenders were simply convicted of more serious crimes.FactCheck: do black criminals get harsher sentences for the same crimes?
Analysis that shows ethnic minority criminals are 240% more likely to be jailed for drug offences cannot exclude the possibility that the BAME offenders were simply convicted of more serious crimes.Black men get longer prison sentences than white men for the same crime: Study
Black men are 19.1 percent more likely to serve longer sentences.
you are just parroting the idea promoted by obama and his street thugs at Black Lies Matter which claim that cops are racists who just pick on black peopleIt's a fact that a black person is more likely to get arrested and serve time for a crime than whites who commit the same crime.
but the rest of America knows thats nonsense
blacks get arrested more because they commit more crimes
its as simple as that
Those are not factsno I am actually stating facts from actual research.you are just parroting the idea promoted by obama and his street thugs at Black Lies Matter which claim that cops are racists who just pick on black peopleIt's a fact that a black person is more likely to get arrested and serve time for a crime than whites who commit the same crime.
but the rest of America knows thats nonsense
blacks get arrested more because they commit more crimes
its as simple as that
FactCheck: do black criminals get harsher sentences for the same crimes?
Analysis that shows ethnic minority criminals are 240% more likely to be jailed for drug offences cannot exclude the possibility that the BAME offenders were simply convicted of more serious crimes.FactCheck: do black criminals get harsher sentences for the same crimes?
Analysis that shows ethnic minority criminals are 240% more likely to be jailed for drug offences cannot exclude the possibility that the BAME offenders were simply convicted of more serious crimes.Black men get longer prison sentences than white men for the same crime: Study
Black men are 19.1 percent more likely to serve longer sentences.
just the opinion of a biased leftwing organization
now its not only cops you are accusing of being racists but prosecutors, judges and black people serving on juries
Black people commit more crimes than whitesWhite people do not get pulled over for having a "wide set nose".
The descendants of the same people who would break up black families by selling them are today the loudest talking people trying to diss the black community about single parent families.
When people start talking about race, there are just some simple realities that cannot be denied. If you are white and don't like how you are portrayed, start thinking about how unpleasant it really is for us who are not white to be portrayed as weak inferior people who got conquered by a supposedly superior race and culture. It is not a pleasant subject. For this to end we all must face the unpleasantness.
The doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem comes from European civil law. It means; “That which is brought forth follows the belly.” This principle determined the legal status of children born by slave women in the America as well as other English or European colonies In colonial law, the partus doctrine justified enslavement, the indigenous people of the Americas and of the Africans imported to various European colonies personal property of those who imported them.
During the time American was a colony, this doctrine established de facto and de jure slavery for all children born to female slaves. Partus sequitur ventrem exempted the father from his obligations to children he fathered by slaves thereby creating the ability for slaveowners to have their way with enslaved women. Under this doctrine the biological father had no paternal responsibility to any child born to a slave woman. Because of this the slaver was provided the right to profit from exploiting the labor of children born to slaves. It gave the slaver the ability to sell children by taking them away from their biological parents. Partus sequitur ventrem was the doctrine that created the first family separation policy in what is now America.
Despite the claims of Africans selling each other, the doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem does not appear to be a part of the system of African slavery.
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape
This was the legal doctrine that made any child of an American female slave a slave as well. It meant any white fathers had no financial responsibility for their progeny. They were free to rape their slaves at will as there were no laws against that either. With no concern for any children that might come from the forced union. In fact, there was a market for mulatto and octaroon children who would be purchased to work as domestics. Some owners (Thomas Jefferson) used their half-white slaves as their concubines, finding them more attractive the closer they were to white. Sally Hemings was Jefferson’s wife’s half-sister, the product of her father raping a slave. Then again the master might sell their offspring to keep the peace with their wives who might be annoyed at little slave children running around who favor their husbands.
Not talked about in proper society were the children of free white women and black slaves. White women who weren’t sure what color the child might be could get a legal abortion those days. “Cottonwood” was a remedy known to slaves who sometimes refused to have children after being raped or as often as the masters would like. Some women would be forced to have over a dozen children if they survived as death during childbirth was relatively common. The rare slave would be offered their freedom if they produced enough children. Sometimes the dark child of a white woman was abandoned or given away. Usually just sold off although technically they were legally free.
View attachment 437108
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape | by William Spivey | Dialogue & Discourse | Medium
Partus sequitur ventrem legal definition of Partus sequitur ventrem (thefreedictionary.com)
Black people commit more crimes than whitesWhite people do not get pulled over for having a "wide set nose".
so they get more attention from the cops
if they are pulled over and have nothing to hide all they have to do is be polite and cooperate with the cops
The descendants of the same people who would break up black families by selling them are today the loudest talking people trying to diss the black community about single parent families.
When people start talking about race, there are just some simple realities that cannot be denied. If you are white and don't like how you are portrayed, start thinking about how unpleasant it really is for us who are not white to be portrayed as weak inferior people who got conquered by a supposedly superior race and culture. It is not a pleasant subject. For this to end we all must face the unpleasantness.
The doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem comes from European civil law. It means; “That which is brought forth follows the belly.” This principle determined the legal status of children born by slave women in the America as well as other English or European colonies In colonial law, the partus doctrine justified enslavement, the indigenous people of the Americas and of the Africans imported to various European colonies personal property of those who imported them.
During the time American was a colony, this doctrine established de facto and de jure slavery for all children born to female slaves. Partus sequitur ventrem exempted the father from his obligations to children he fathered by slaves thereby creating the ability for slaveowners to have their way with enslaved women. Under this doctrine the biological father had no paternal responsibility to any child born to a slave woman. Because of this the slaver was provided the right to profit from exploiting the labor of children born to slaves. It gave the slaver the ability to sell children by taking them away from their biological parents. Partus sequitur ventrem was the doctrine that created the first family separation policy in what is now America.
Despite the claims of Africans selling each other, the doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem does not appear to be a part of the system of African slavery.
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape
This was the legal doctrine that made any child of an American female slave a slave as well. It meant any white fathers had no financial responsibility for their progeny. They were free to rape their slaves at will as there were no laws against that either. With no concern for any children that might come from the forced union. In fact, there was a market for mulatto and octaroon children who would be purchased to work as domestics. Some owners (Thomas Jefferson) used their half-white slaves as their concubines, finding them more attractive the closer they were to white. Sally Hemings was Jefferson’s wife’s half-sister, the product of her father raping a slave. Then again the master might sell their offspring to keep the peace with their wives who might be annoyed at little slave children running around who favor their husbands.
Not talked about in proper society were the children of free white women and black slaves. White women who weren’t sure what color the child might be could get a legal abortion those days. “Cottonwood” was a remedy known to slaves who sometimes refused to have children after being raped or as often as the masters would like. Some women would be forced to have over a dozen children if they survived as death during childbirth was relatively common. The rare slave would be offered their freedom if they produced enough children. Sometimes the dark child of a white woman was abandoned or given away. Usually just sold off although technically they were legally free.
View attachment 437108
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape | by William Spivey | Dialogue & Discourse | Medium
Partus sequitur ventrem legal definition of Partus sequitur ventrem (thefreedictionary.com)
Breaking News!!!!!!
Slavery ended in America ended 157 years ago. So hey.....whew.....you can relax now.....okay.
And yet it took until the late 1960's for the Civil rights act to be passed.
What do you think it was like for Blacks between the end of slavery and the time the Civil Rights Act became law?
And even after the Civil Rights act there was not this instant end to racism and discrimination
You people need to study a little sociology.
Black people commit more crimes than whitesWhite people do not get pulled over for having a "wide set nose".
so they get more attention from the cops
if they are pulled over and have nothing to hide all they have to do is be polite and cooperate with the cops
that will see them through 99.99% of the situations they are in - if they are not transporting illegal drugs, stolen property or illegal firearms
The descendants of the same people who would break up black families by selling them are today the loudest talking people trying to diss the black community about single parent families.
When people start talking about race, there are just some simple realities that cannot be denied. If you are white and don't like how you are portrayed, start thinking about how unpleasant it really is for us who are not white to be portrayed as weak inferior people who got conquered by a supposedly superior race and culture. It is not a pleasant subject. For this to end we all must face the unpleasantness.
The doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem comes from European civil law. It means; “That which is brought forth follows the belly.” This principle determined the legal status of children born by slave women in the America as well as other English or European colonies In colonial law, the partus doctrine justified enslavement, the indigenous people of the Americas and of the Africans imported to various European colonies personal property of those who imported them.
During the time American was a colony, this doctrine established de facto and de jure slavery for all children born to female slaves. Partus sequitur ventrem exempted the father from his obligations to children he fathered by slaves thereby creating the ability for slaveowners to have their way with enslaved women. Under this doctrine the biological father had no paternal responsibility to any child born to a slave woman. Because of this the slaver was provided the right to profit from exploiting the labor of children born to slaves. It gave the slaver the ability to sell children by taking them away from their biological parents. Partus sequitur ventrem was the doctrine that created the first family separation policy in what is now America.
Despite the claims of Africans selling each other, the doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem does not appear to be a part of the system of African slavery.
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape
This was the legal doctrine that made any child of an American female slave a slave as well. It meant any white fathers had no financial responsibility for their progeny. They were free to rape their slaves at will as there were no laws against that either. With no concern for any children that might come from the forced union. In fact, there was a market for mulatto and octaroon children who would be purchased to work as domestics. Some owners (Thomas Jefferson) used their half-white slaves as their concubines, finding them more attractive the closer they were to white. Sally Hemings was Jefferson’s wife’s half-sister, the product of her father raping a slave. Then again the master might sell their offspring to keep the peace with their wives who might be annoyed at little slave children running around who favor their husbands.
Not talked about in proper society were the children of free white women and black slaves. White women who weren’t sure what color the child might be could get a legal abortion those days. “Cottonwood” was a remedy known to slaves who sometimes refused to have children after being raped or as often as the masters would like. Some women would be forced to have over a dozen children if they survived as death during childbirth was relatively common. The rare slave would be offered their freedom if they produced enough children. Sometimes the dark child of a white woman was abandoned or given away. Usually just sold off although technically they were legally free.
View attachment 437108
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape | by William Spivey | Dialogue & Discourse | Medium
Partus sequitur ventrem legal definition of Partus sequitur ventrem (thefreedictionary.com)
What a bunch of nonsense.
Bring me a negro who was a slave, and I'll bring you a white guy who owned slaves to atone for his sins.
Slavery happened and it sucked, but don't even think about blaming anyone alive today for it...
The descendants of the same people who would break up black families by selling them are today the loudest talking people trying to diss the black community about single parent families.
When people start talking about race, there are just some simple realities that cannot be denied. If you are white and don't like how you are portrayed, start thinking about how unpleasant it really is for us who are not white to be portrayed as weak inferior people who got conquered by a supposedly superior race and culture. It is not a pleasant subject. For this to end we all must face the unpleasantness.
The doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem comes from European civil law. It means; “That which is brought forth follows the belly.” This principle determined the legal status of children born by slave women in the America as well as other English or European colonies In colonial law, the partus doctrine justified enslavement, the indigenous people of the Americas and of the Africans imported to various European colonies personal property of those who imported them.
During the time American was a colony, this doctrine established de facto and de jure slavery for all children born to female slaves. Partus sequitur ventrem exempted the father from his obligations to children he fathered by slaves thereby creating the ability for slaveowners to have their way with enslaved women. Under this doctrine the biological father had no paternal responsibility to any child born to a slave woman. Because of this the slaver was provided the right to profit from exploiting the labor of children born to slaves. It gave the slaver the ability to sell children by taking them away from their biological parents. Partus sequitur ventrem was the doctrine that created the first family separation policy in what is now America.
Despite the claims of Africans selling each other, the doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem does not appear to be a part of the system of African slavery.
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape
This was the legal doctrine that made any child of an American female slave a slave as well. It meant any white fathers had no financial responsibility for their progeny. They were free to rape their slaves at will as there were no laws against that either. With no concern for any children that might come from the forced union. In fact, there was a market for mulatto and octaroon children who would be purchased to work as domestics. Some owners (Thomas Jefferson) used their half-white slaves as their concubines, finding them more attractive the closer they were to white. Sally Hemings was Jefferson’s wife’s half-sister, the product of her father raping a slave. Then again the master might sell their offspring to keep the peace with their wives who might be annoyed at little slave children running around who favor their husbands.
Not talked about in proper society were the children of free white women and black slaves. White women who weren’t sure what color the child might be could get a legal abortion those days. “Cottonwood” was a remedy known to slaves who sometimes refused to have children after being raped or as often as the masters would like. Some women would be forced to have over a dozen children if they survived as death during childbirth was relatively common. The rare slave would be offered their freedom if they produced enough children. Sometimes the dark child of a white woman was abandoned or given away. Usually just sold off although technically they were legally free.
View attachment 437108
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape | by William Spivey | Dialogue & Discourse | Medium
Partus sequitur ventrem legal definition of Partus sequitur ventrem (thefreedictionary.com)
Breaking News!!!!!!
Slavery ended in America ended 157 years ago. So hey.....whew.....you can relax now.....okay.
And yet it took until the late 1960's for the Civil rights act to be passed.
What do you think it was like for Blacks between the end of slavery and the time the Civil Rights Act became law?
And even after the Civil Rights act there was not this instant end to racism and discrimination
You people need to study a little sociology.
Slavery was abolished in the 1860's
The right to vote was established in the 1860's
Citizenship for blacks was established in the 1860's
It was the Democrats who tried hard for the next 100 years to control the blacks into a second class existence.
The laws were long in place but Democrats century long disrespect for Constitutional law was the main reason for blacks rights being denied.
You need to do more reading of history.
Why not?really the United States Sentencing Commission is a left wing org?
Why not?really the United States Sentencing Commission is a left wing org?
liberals are very clever about infiltrating government organizations and exercising their leftwing agenda
NPR is a good example of that
or any other government creature I can think of
Why not?really the United States Sentencing Commission is a left wing org?
liberals are very clever about infiltrating government organizations and exercising their leftwing agenda
NPR is a good example of that
or any other government creature I can think of
Ok prove that the US Sentencing Commission is "left wing".
The descendants of the same people who would break up black families by selling them are today the loudest talking people trying to diss the black community about single parent families.
When people start talking about race, there are just some simple realities that cannot be denied. If you are white and don't like how you are portrayed, start thinking about how unpleasant it really is for us who are not white to be portrayed as weak inferior people who got conquered by a supposedly superior race and culture. It is not a pleasant subject. For this to end we all must face the unpleasantness.
The doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem comes from European civil law. It means; “That which is brought forth follows the belly.” This principle determined the legal status of children born by slave women in the America as well as other English or European colonies In colonial law, the partus doctrine justified enslavement, the indigenous people of the Americas and of the Africans imported to various European colonies personal property of those who imported them.
During the time American was a colony, this doctrine established de facto and de jure slavery for all children born to female slaves. Partus sequitur ventrem exempted the father from his obligations to children he fathered by slaves thereby creating the ability for slaveowners to have their way with enslaved women. Under this doctrine the biological father had no paternal responsibility to any child born to a slave woman. Because of this the slaver was provided the right to profit from exploiting the labor of children born to slaves. It gave the slaver the ability to sell children by taking them away from their biological parents. Partus sequitur ventrem was the doctrine that created the first family separation policy in what is now America.
Despite the claims of Africans selling each other, the doctrine of Partus sequitur ventrem does not appear to be a part of the system of African slavery.
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape
This was the legal doctrine that made any child of an American female slave a slave as well. It meant any white fathers had no financial responsibility for their progeny. They were free to rape their slaves at will as there were no laws against that either. With no concern for any children that might come from the forced union. In fact, there was a market for mulatto and octaroon children who would be purchased to work as domestics. Some owners (Thomas Jefferson) used their half-white slaves as their concubines, finding them more attractive the closer they were to white. Sally Hemings was Jefferson’s wife’s half-sister, the product of her father raping a slave. Then again the master might sell their offspring to keep the peace with their wives who might be annoyed at little slave children running around who favor their husbands.
Not talked about in proper society were the children of free white women and black slaves. White women who weren’t sure what color the child might be could get a legal abortion those days. “Cottonwood” was a remedy known to slaves who sometimes refused to have children after being raped or as often as the masters would like. Some women would be forced to have over a dozen children if they survived as death during childbirth was relatively common. The rare slave would be offered their freedom if they produced enough children. Sometimes the dark child of a white woman was abandoned or given away. Usually just sold off although technically they were legally free.
View attachment 437108
Partus Sequitur Ventrem — The Rule That Perpetrated Slavery And Legalized Rape | by William Spivey | Dialogue & Discourse | Medium
Partus sequitur ventrem legal definition of Partus sequitur ventrem (thefreedictionary.com)
What a bunch of nonsense.
Bring me a negro who was a slave, and I'll bring you a white guy who owned slaves to atone for his sins.
Slavery happened and it sucked, but don't even think about blaming anyone alive today for it...
I can bring you people who were discriminated against. I can bring you the black woman that integrated our school system as a child and had to endure the name calling and the loneliness of sitting alone in school.
What the data claims is that liberal democrat district attorneys, judges and black juries are anti black racistsThe actual sentencing data proves it
