Steinlight
VIP Member
- Jan 30, 2014
- 4,508
- 289
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, like anybody is going to take the better part of an hour to watch a crock of shit.
Yeah, like anybody is going to take the better part of an hour to watch a crock of shit.
What about it is a crock of shit? Which part?
Yeah, like anybody is going to take the better part of an hour to watch a crock of shit.
What about it is a crock of shit? Which part?
The part where you claim or it claims no gas chambers existed. To many pictures eye witness accounts documents and physical evidence to take that claim serious. Hell they just found an architectural drawing of one of the camps gas chambers.
I mean, hell. If you're going to claim something didn't happen, at least have enough brains not to do it before all the survivors have passed.
I mean, hell. If you're going to claim something didn't happen, at least have enough brains not to do it before all the survivors have passed.
It is a cash cow, it will never die, you have children and grandchildren of "survivors" and so forth.
We need to expose the flaws in the stories to bring down their Zionist system. They use this system not only to create the state of Israel, and commit crimes against the Palestinians, they use this myth to demonize anyone that exposes their power structure or criticizes Jewish power.
If you're attempting to rewrite history -- you've got a lot of work to do.
If FACT -- even if you questioned the number of EVERYONE "disposed of" by the Nazi camps (not just Jews) -- I wouldn't CARE if they were killed with ZyclonB, poison darts, or bad deli sandwiches..
Why don't you do a better job of summarizing the EVIDENCE presented in your video.. Just give me a few bullet points of WHO is making assertions and why they are important. If it intrigues me, I'll invest the time. And I'm sure others would too. But the credibility is so low --- I think you're gonna have to fold.
If you're attempting to rewrite history -- you've got a lot of work to do.
If FACT -- even if you questioned the number of EVERYONE "disposed of" by the Nazi camps (not just Jews) -- I wouldn't CARE if they were killed with ZyclonB, poison darts, or bad deli sandwiches..
Why don't you do a better job of summarizing the EVIDENCE presented in your video.. Just give me a few bullet points of WHO is making assertions and why they are important. If it intrigues me, I'll invest the time. And I'm sure others would too. But the credibility is so low --- I think you're gonna have to fold.
My job isn't to summarize this 47 minute video for you. If you are too lazy to watch it, you shouldn't have posted in this thread.
If you're attempting to rewrite history -- you've got a lot of work to do.
If FACT -- even if you questioned the number of EVERYONE "disposed of" by the Nazi camps (not just Jews) -- I wouldn't CARE if they were killed with ZyclonB, poison darts, or bad deli sandwiches..
Why don't you do a better job of summarizing the EVIDENCE presented in your video.. Just give me a few bullet points of WHO is making assertions and why they are important. If it intrigues me, I'll invest the time. And I'm sure others would too. But the credibility is so low --- I think you're gonna have to fold.
My job isn't to summarize this 47 minute video for you. If you are too lazy to watch it, you shouldn't have posted in this thread.
Actually -- it's you making the allegation.. For your stated "anti-zionist" purposes. So by all rules of debate and scientific evidence --- it IS your job to summarize the evidence. We're not buying tickets to your movie, until we see the trailer..
Owner's missing, presumed dead. Or?
My job isn't to summarize this 47 minute video for you. If you are too lazy to watch it, you shouldn't have posted in this thread.
Actually -- it's you making the allegation.. For your stated "anti-zionist" purposes. So by all rules of debate and scientific evidence --- it IS your job to summarize the evidence. We're not buying tickets to your movie, until we see the trailer..
Can you cite these rules, provide a link. Where in the "rules of debate", does it say I have to summarize videos for you?
I am not going to summarize it if you are too lazy or uncurious to watch. That is not my job.
You may not be lazy in the short term, like making vapid and ignorant posts. However, you are intellectually lazy and uncurious.Actually -- it's you making the allegation.. For your stated "anti-zionist" purposes. So by all rules of debate and scientific evidence --- it IS your job to summarize the evidence. We're not buying tickets to your movie, until we see the trailer..
Can you cite these rules, provide a link. Where in the "rules of debate", does it say I have to summarize videos for you?
I am not going to summarize it if you are too lazy or uncurious to watch. That is not my job.
Nor is it ours to waste our time watching a stupid-ass video that you can't even be bothered to summarize. Lazy much?