The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

It is not mine yes the wound path was proven at the autopsy and nothing about it was fake

The entry is too low, you little minion. Too low means that it didn't happen.
No it is not and it did

You is it and you are stupid.
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

There was no entrance low or high but the official one was near the eop. Too low. Sorry.
No it was not you lie.

It was not too low
 
The bullet entered from above and behind that was proven by evidence.

No evidence supports you and had he lives the case against Oswald was airtight

You have no wound path you piece of crap.LOL
The autopsy showed the wound path you failed to refute it

You are them, you idiot and you wouldn't dare try to prove that nonsense.
It is fact which the evidence proves

You haven't shown any evidence. I did all that and you did nothing but deny and ignore it. That proves you are retarded.
You showed no evidence at all boy but I did and it CRUSHES you
 
It's your case to prove. You have no wound path. Your fake entry was too low.LOL
It is not mine yes the wound path was proven at the autopsy and nothing about it was fake

The entry is too low, you little minion. Too low means that it didn't happen.
No it is not and it did

You is it and you are stupid.
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

Was he facing down or pretty much straight? It was too low.
 
The bullet entered from above and behind that was proven by evidence.

No evidence supports you and had he lives the case against Oswald was airtight

Oswald was a patsy. He said so himself.LOL
All criminals deny their guilt his say so means nothing the evidence proves he did it

He was a patsy and said so himself. No evidence can be provided that he shot jfk in the head. ZERO.
Yes he shot Kennedy and all criminals deny their guilt making his claim meaningless

Yes tons of evidence proves he did it and most witnesses support that evkdence

Oswald was innocent. The shot came from the car and no place else.
Oswald was guilty the evidence proves it no shot was fired in the car
 
The entry is too low, you little minion. Too low means that it didn't happen.
No it is not and it did

You is it and you are stupid.
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

There was no entrance low or high but the official one was near the eop. Too low. Sorry.
No it was not you lie.

It was not too low

Proof your stupid case, ya pussy. It was too low and no photo shows any hole there.
 
It is not mine yes the wound path was proven at the autopsy and nothing about it was fake

The entry is too low, you little minion. Too low means that it didn't happen.
No it is not and it did

You is it and you are stupid.
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

Was he facing down or pretty much straight? It was too low.
It was not too low
 
Oswald was a patsy. He said so himself.LOL
All criminals deny their guilt his say so means nothing the evidence proves he did it

He was a patsy and said so himself. No evidence can be provided that he shot jfk in the head. ZERO.
Yes he shot Kennedy and all criminals deny their guilt making his claim meaningless

Yes tons of evidence proves he did it and most witnesses support that evkdence

Oswald was innocent. The shot came from the car and no place else.
Oswald was guilty the evidence proves it no shot was fired in the car

Greer was guilty the evidence proves a shot was fired in the car.
 
No it is not and it did

You is it and you are stupid.
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

There was no entrance low or high but the official one was near the eop. Too low. Sorry.
No it was not you lie.

It was not too low

Proof your stupid case, ya pussy. It was too low and no photo shows any hole there.
It was not too low
 
The entry is too low, you little minion. Too low means that it didn't happen.
No it is not and it did

You is it and you are stupid.
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

Was he facing down or pretty much straight? It was too low.
It was not too low

You lie and offer proof of your lies because they are lies.
 
All criminals deny their guilt his say so means nothing the evidence proves he did it

He was a patsy and said so himself. No evidence can be provided that he shot jfk in the head. ZERO.
Yes he shot Kennedy and all criminals deny their guilt making his claim meaningless

Yes tons of evidence proves he did it and most witnesses support that evkdence

Oswald was innocent. The shot came from the car and no place else.
Oswald was guilty the evidence proves it no shot was fired in the car

Greer was guilty the evidence proves a shot was fired in the car.
No such evidence exists Oswald did it as the evidence lroves
 
No it is not and it did

You is it and you are stupid.
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

Was he facing down or pretty much straight? It was too low.
It was not too low

You lie and offer proof of your lies because they are lies.
I state facts you are the proven liar
 
He was a patsy and said so himself. No evidence can be provided that he shot jfk in the head. ZERO.
Yes he shot Kennedy and all criminals deny their guilt making his claim meaningless

Yes tons of evidence proves he did it and most witnesses support that evkdence

Oswald was innocent. The shot came from the car and no place else.
Oswald was guilty the evidence proves it no shot was fired in the car

Greer was guilty the evidence proves a shot was fired in the car.
No such evidence exists Oswald did it as the evidence lroves

No such evidence exists that Oswald did it as the evidence clearly shows.LOL
 
Yes he shot Kennedy and all criminals deny their guilt making his claim meaningless

Yes tons of evidence proves he did it and most witnesses support that evkdence

Oswald was innocent. The shot came from the car and no place else.
Oswald was guilty the evidence proves it no shot was fired in the car

Greer was guilty the evidence proves a shot was fired in the car.
No such evidence exists Oswald did it as the evidence lroves

No such evidence exists that Oswald did it as the evidence clearly shows.LOL
Yes the evidence proves he did it
 
You is it and you are stupid.
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

Was he facing down or pretty much straight? It was too low.
It was not too low

You lie and offer proof of your lies because they are lies.
I state facts you are the proven liar

facts state you are the proven liar.LOL Your ability to retard is brilliant.
 
Yet I make a fool of you and the entrance wound was not to low

Was he facing down or pretty much straight? It was too low.
It was not too low

You lie and offer proof of your lies because they are lies.
I state facts you are the proven liar

facts state you are the proven liar.LOL Your ability to retard is brilliant.
Wrong .

I have given you the facts and evidence you lose
 
Oswald was innocent. The shot came from the car and no place else.
Oswald was guilty the evidence proves it no shot was fired in the car

Greer was guilty the evidence proves a shot was fired in the car.
No such evidence exists Oswald did it as the evidence lroves

No such evidence exists that Oswald did it as the evidence clearly shows.LOL
Yes the evidence proves he did it

Yes the evidence proves that Greer did it.
 
Was he facing down or pretty much straight? It was too low.
It was not too low

You lie and offer proof of your lies because they are lies.
I state facts you are the proven liar

facts state you are the proven liar.LOL Your ability to retard is brilliant.
Wrong .

I have given you the facts and evidence you lose

Referring the to AR as fact is not evidence. Your opinion, nothing more.
 
Oswald was guilty the evidence proves it no shot was fired in the car

Greer was guilty the evidence proves a shot was fired in the car.
No such evidence exists Oswald did it as the evidence lroves

No such evidence exists that Oswald did it as the evidence clearly shows.LOL
Yes the evidence proves he did it

Yes the evidence proves that Greer did it.
Wrong boy not one shred of evidence supports your claim
 
It was not too low

You lie and offer proof of your lies because they are lies.
I state facts you are the proven liar

facts state you are the proven liar.LOL Your ability to retard is brilliant.
Wrong .

I have given you the facts and evidence you lose

Referring the to AR as fact is not evidence. Your opinion, nothing more.
The AR is evidence proving you wrong you lied about it.
 
Amazon.com We Were There Revelations from the Dallas Doctors Who Attended to JFK on November 22 1963 eBook Allen Childs MD Kindle Store

It's snippets of evidence such as this that make the internet so awesome. It is only logical that many people would have been willing say they saw the driver shoot jfk. This is one of the most obvious facts exposing government evil that has been found thus far. Imagining a world with more truths such as this is much less a dream than ever before. It's a real possibility if the willingness can extend significantly outward. Somebody refers to a specific person and the front excludes the grassy snow job. Greer provided an ironic photo a billion times over if the image was taken after the assassination?

In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Ronald Coy Jones, ronald coy jones - Google Search

"We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either."

Nothing of value here December 28, 2013

By Alexander J. Marciniszyn

Format:Hardcover

In the Introduction, on page xiii, the author writes: "Late in this project, I came upon a startling revelation in Dr. Ron Jones's oral history. After taking his Warren Commission deposition at Parkland, chief counsel Arlen Specter told Jones, 'We have people who would testify that they saw somebody shoot the president from the front. But we don't want to interview them, and I don't want you to say anything about that, either.'" Not much of a revelation to anyone who's studied the Kennedy assassination in depth. This author just throws up his hands in a "what is history and what is real or not?" kind of way at the end.

Get a copy of Trauma Room One by Dr. Charles Crenshaw. Steer clear of this one.

 

Forum List

Back
Top