The last stand for Freedom

The last stand for freedom is ownership of guns.
When our forefathers added the 2ed amendment to the constitution it wasnt about self defense so much or hunting or target shooting .
It was about the people being able to stand up and arm themselfs to fight aginst a tyrannical goverment .
Our own goverment.
Look at Venezuela .
In 2012 they confiscated guns now just a few years later thier socialist goverment has stolen the wealth and people are throwing sticks and rocks trying to take control of thier goverment.
Which by the way morons like cortez omar sanders talib and others support . the peoplehave no money due to inflation the goverments there has stolen thier wealth and people are eating thier pets and leaving the nation.
This is our future if democrats and socialist have thier way.
O yes they deny it but history tell us differnt often.


You see semocrats who want to censorship free speech control guns control your health care your money what you eat etc dont be fooled how it will work out in the end.

Hiltler didnt tell people what he had planned either or stalin or mao or Madura in Venezuela or castro . They all lied and fools listened to them untill it was to late then they were screwed.

Translation : You need an AR style rifle so you can shoot police and military .
Or he needs it to assist the military like the partisans did against the Nazis in various countries after their militaries were all but defeated in the invasions.
 
----------------------------------------------- I eat 3 times a day plus I eat unlimited snacks is when and what I EAT . I also sleep , eat and live in a nice home for 70 years . So that's the Basics and I get to work from that BASE to Gather MORE material things and better living conditions if I like . USA has a pretty good system , best in the World . And 'we got Guns so that's just MORE Gravy and better than 'england' and other so called and possible First World ' nations Sparky . .

Merica!!!

Of course when people said 'a well regulated militia' what they actually meant was 'armed slave patrols'.

excatly.....

thats funny stuff

reality you can't handle
 
The cowardly siege mentality of right-wingers and their vulnerability to scare tactics concerning guns plays directly into the hands of authoritarians.

yup, check out N.I.M.S. ,and it hammers that point home....

There is no risk to the 2nd amendment but there is to other rights that have been corrupted by the illegal wars in the US. Yet you people say not a damn word about the rest of our rights being taken away.

Thier gun is more important because they <think> they'll always be on the winning team

~S~
 
----------------------------------------------- I eat 3 times a day plus I eat unlimited snacks is when and what I EAT . I also sleep , eat and live in a nice home for 70 years . So that's the Basics and I get to work from that BASE to Gather MORE material things and better living conditions if I like . USA has a pretty good system , best in the World . And 'we got Guns so that's just MORE Gravy and better than 'england' and other so called and possible First World ' nations Sparky . .

Merica!!!

Of course when people said 'a well regulated militia' what they actually meant was 'armed slave patrols'.

excatly.....

thats funny stuff

reality you can't handle


if you say so sparky :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
The cowardly siege mentality of right-wingers and their vulnerability to scare tactics concerning guns plays directly into the hands of authoritarians.

yup, check out N.I.M.S. ,and it hammers that point home....

There is no risk to the 2nd amendment but there is to other rights that have been corrupted by the illegal wars in the US. Yet you people say not a damn word about the rest of our rights being taken away.

Thier gun is more important because they <think> they'll always be on the winning team

~S~
Whose gonna put us on the losing team, and is that a threat ??
 
The 1% in America have actively stolen the 99%'s wealth over the last generation ,despite the fact that most of us are armed

so, tell me again, how my arsenal makes me 'free' in said regard?

~S~
You willingly and voluntarily purchasing products does not mean the producer is stealing from you.
 
The cowardly siege mentality of right-wingers and their vulnerability to scare tactics concerning guns plays directly into the hands of authoritarians. They can run roughshod over every other right we have as long as it's hands off gun ownership. We have more than one right in this country. If right-wingers defended those with the same zeal they defend gun ownership they would not seem like such authoritarian hypocrites.
So, how's that gun confiscation thing working out for Venezuelans?

Considering the government's running them over with armored vehicles...not so great, I'd say.
 
The last stand for freedom is ownership of guns.
When our forefathers added the 2ed amendment to the constitution it wasnt about self defense so much or hunting or target shooting .
It was about the people being able to stand up and arm themselfs to fight aginst a tyrannical goverment .
Our own goverment.
Look at Venezuela .
In 2012 they confiscated guns now just a few years later thier socialist goverment has stolen the wealth and people are throwing sticks and rocks trying to take control of thier goverment.
Which by the way morons like cortez omar sanders talib and others support . the peoplehave no money due to inflation the goverments there has stolen thier wealth and people are eating thier pets and leaving the nation.
This is our future if democrats and socialist have thier way.
O yes they deny it but history tell us differnt often.


You see semocrats who want to censorship free speech control guns control your health care your money what you eat etc dont be fooled how it will work out in the end.

Hiltler didnt tell people what he had planned either or stalin or mao or Madura in Venezuela or castro . They all lied and fools listened to them untill it was to late then they were screwed.

Translation : You need an AR style rifle so you can shoot police and military .
Or he needs it to assist the military like the partisans did against the Nazis in various countries after their militaries were all but defeated in the invasions.

Oh so now it’s abour fending off foreign invaders? Moving goalposts are we?

Now the scenario is the us military has been defeated and now you and your rifle will save us.
 
The last stand for freedom is ownership of guns.
When our forefathers added the 2ed amendment to the constitution it wasnt about self defense so much or hunting or target shooting .
It was about the people being able to stand up and arm themselfs to fight aginst a tyrannical goverment .

I think you are a little confused. We aren't free because of guns. We live in a society with metal detectors, key cards, CCTV, security checkpoints, all because of your Gun Fetish... the rest of us didn't sign up for this, but we're stuck with it.

Look at Venezuela .
In 2012 they confiscated guns now just a few years later thier socialist goverment has stolen the wealth and people are throwing sticks and rocks trying to take control of thier goverment.

again, you are a bit confused. Venezuela VOTED for Socialism and has kept it despite punishing economic sanctions, and two attempted coups by the US.

Hiltler didnt tell people what he had planned either

Um, yeah, he did. He spelled it all out in Mein Kampf... which was the best selling book in Germany after the Bible.
You seem to be a moron key cards cctv locks keys metal dectors have nothing to do with freedom .security and safety yes but freedom no.
A unarmed man can shake his fist and cry a armed man can affect change and thats what the second amendment is about.

As for Venezuela it was a very well to do nation now its a socialist paradise and all its citizens can do is shake thier boobs and peckers at the goverment no guns no medical supplys no vote no food .
Your either a moron or a socialist probally both
a armed man can affect change
What country are you from, Aponi? In this country, we consider armed violence to achieve our political ends as terrorism, and if the perpetrator doesn't kill himself in the process we throw him in prison for the rest of his life.

Only once has this country risen in armed revolt, and they lost.

You're in the wrong place for a dream such as yours.
A armed man cant affect change you say you dumb bitch.
Perhaps you may have heard of the revolutionary war

The Revolutionary War was fought nearly 250 years ago using infantry, calvalry, and single shot muskets and home made bullets.

Can you think of a single successful revolutionary war fought in the last 100 years by lightly armed citizens rebelling against their government. All successful revolutions have been fought by heavily armed and highly trained militant forces, with either financial or actual imbedded tactical assistance from a the government of a major arms selling nation. The Bolshevik Revolution in 1918 was the last one. Since then, all government overthrows have come at the hands of a large foreign back military operation.

What is far more effective is peaceful revolutions. Where the people refused to be governed by assholes any longer and take to the streets. Like what is happening in Venezuela. Unfortunately the Russians told Maduro to stay or he'd be gone by now.
 
the main thing is simply to have the same efficient and effective man carried portable Guns and Small Arms that the USA Military has simply because they are eficient and effective DLady .
 
Eric swalwell a democrat running for president is crying that the constitution has no mention of women in it . moron its has no mention of men either . but it has the words we the people and no discrimination based on color or sex 8n the amendments.
Hes a moron like most democrats who hate America and want to pervert it and twist its laws
If the Constitution has no mention of women or men in it, but it refers to "we the people, please explain why the female one-half of "we the people" were denied the right to vote until 1920 and the part of "we the people" who are not white had to fight to exercise their right to vote up through the 1960s.

Should women and non-whites arm ourselves to ensure that our freedom is secure? You supposedly are a woman, race unknown, you tell me. Is personally arming ourselves, women, non-whites, LGBTs, Muslims, Jews, the method by which we all protect our freedom? Must we stand armed around our houses of worship, medical clinics, bars and restaurants? Is this the kind of society you want to live in?
Why would anyone feel that they would have to stand outside while armed in America now ?? It ain't the American's that various groups should be fearing, but instead they should be fearing their ownselves for the beliefs that they hold in which are in alot of ways ANTI-AMERICAN, and it is undoubtedly tearing them apart inside and out, and it is making them jump at their own shadows while blaming others for it.

American's who don't hold other's various belief's just want to be left alone, but somehow that is impossible to do anymore or is it ??

So yes you might be right in some sense, that in a bid to protect the American culture, and the American way of life in which has served the citizens well in uniting cultures for decades under the flag (in which most have been serving for years now), has definitely got the citizens armed to the teeth in order to DEFEND themselves and their families against tyrannical forces seeking to destroy their way of life (if they feel that they have to protect their way of life or culture). Yes as you say It works for everyone the same, but is it the old gaurd that is the problem or is it the new gaurd causing the problems ?? I'm talking about the citizens here, and not government.

Redirecting hunting weapons or citizens seeking to arm themselves with the latest weaponry for defense purposes, instead of using them for sport and hunting purposes (if this is the case or what is going on), uhh is now a dammed shame in this country if that is what it has been pushed towards, and hopefully it will be resolved by people getting the hell out of each others business again in life, instead of it going the other way.

As for the government, it should be the first to get out of the business of attempting to socially engineer something (the same as Hitler attempted to do), and it needs to get back to governing all citizens equally be it done all decent and in order, instead of being swayed by groups to abuse other groups in this country against their will, and this by forces that might take control within the government against the majority of the peoples will. Not talking about a majority that lay in bigger states within the union, who are attempting to control something by their majority within a few states in which is wrong, but I'm talking instead about all states being represented across the entire spectrum or board within these United States which is right.

Like I say all the time though, the government is only representative of those whom control it these days, and not representative of the citizens across the board when things do go bad in America, otherwise in such a situation where millions of citizens are avoided without the use of the electorial college.

Thank God for the electorial college is all American's can say at this point.

The economy for all, is a great measure of these things. The economy is great and getting better, and that's great.

Where have you been? There have been attacks on houses of worship, women's clinics, bars frequented by LGBTs. All frequented by AMERICANS.

Just what do you think is "American" or "anti-American"? Just what is "the American way of life"? "American culture"? I grew up seeing the Rockettes perform at Radio City every Easter and Christmas when I was a child. Ain't this America?
 
the main thing is simply to have the same efficient and effective man carried portable Guns and Small Arms that the USA Military has simply because they are eficient and effective DLady .

Yes, they were really effective in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They were really effective for the Branch Davidians. Or how about that lying cattle farmer out west who didn't want to pay for grazing rights. Name one armred militia stand-off in the USA that has ended well for the militia.
 
USA hasn't had an armed Militia standoff for a long time as far as i know . But now you are saying that USA 'democrat' Government would nuke the USA so as to neutrilize REAL Americans in the USA eh DragonLady ? [when they regain power in Government] But that aside who is it in the middle east muslim lands that have been fighting the USA and the 'allies' for 17 - 18 years with SMALL ARMS and were fighting the Soviets before they were fighting the USA and Allies DLady .
 
Last edited:
and before that 'the afghanis' held the 'brits' at Bay for how long and did kick the 'wankers' out of 'afghanistan' with small arms didn't they DLady .
 
and mostly the 'muslim' fighters and what i'd call Americas and the Western Worlds enemies in the muslim lands are using Small Arms and improvised arms , explosives and captured weapons aren't they DLady ??
 
You seem to be a moron key cards cctv locks keys metal dectors have nothing to do with freedom .security and safety yes but freedom no.
A unarmed man can shake his fist and cry a armed man can affect change and thats what the second amendment is about.

Here's what happens to an armed man. A better armed man shoots his ass. No matter how much you compensate for your tiny dick with guns, the government will always have more guns, better guns and for the most part, they won't get in trouble for using them.

I'm a lot more worried about a nut coming into my workplace with a gun than I am about the government.

As for Venezuela it was a very well to do nation now its a socialist paradise and all its citizens can do is shake thier boobs and peckers at the goverment no guns no medical supplys no vote no food .
Your either a moron or a socialist probally both

It was a prosperous nation for the rich... The poor, not so much, which is why they voted the socialists in to start with.

And, yes, they have none of those things because we've been imposing sanctions on them for years.
They did vite in the socialists

But the failure is due to socialism not sanctions and even then poor were better off before socialism.

They were in fact more prosperous before socialism

Both the rich and the poor.
I appreciate the cite which backs up your assertion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top