The LEGAL Grounds For Deportation

[DarkFury]

This is the key point FOR Trumps ability to DEPORT ALL those ILLEGALS be they born here or NOT. The liberals have been leaving out a key sentence and THAT sentence is the legal point he WILL be making.

Democrats AND SCOTUS have refused at this point to ENFORCE the ENTIRE law of the 14th and that is where our problems lie. THEIR refusal to obey they law and their need to "forget" certain parts to fit their agenda.

One could argue that their deceit is tied to a "Cloward/Piven" movement to destroy the U.S. economy and start a socialist/communist style nation OR to use those ILLEGALS as voting stock to start a NEW form of Communist group we could call Clintonisum.

Short video....

 

[waltky]

Granny says, "Dat' right - outta jail, den outta the country...

Federal Prisons Must Now Hand Over Illegals with Deportation Orders to ICE First
February 24, 2016 | U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch told a House Appropriations Subcommittee on Wednesday that the administration is changing how the Federal Bureau of Prisons handles illegal immigrants with deportation orders, allowing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to take custody first instead of turning those prisoners over to local and state authorities to face prosecution.

“I do want to reiterate the fact that one of the things we hope will be as effective also and more immediately effective is our policy whereby the Bureau of Prisons is – instead of deferring to the state or local entity detainer and turning a deportable individual over to them - that instead, Immigration Customs Enforcement or ICE will instead have the ability to step in and exercise their detainer first,” Lynch told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies during a hearing on the DOJ’s FY 2017 budget request. Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas), chair of the subcommittee, thanked Lynch for her “timely response” to a letter he sent her earlier this year on sanctuary cities.

According to Culberson, Lynch replied to his letter, saying that when the DOJ receives a credible allegation that a local or state entity receiving funds under a department grant or reimbursement program has violated the law that mandates that they share information with ICE on the immigration status of their prisoners, the department can seek “criminal or civil enforcement actions against that entity.” “Could you assure the committee that the Department of Justice will review grantees with such policies to ensure that they’re in compliance with all applicable federal laws?” Culberson asked. “Certainly, that is a part of our grant review process, and as was also conveyed in the letter, I do want to reiterate the fact that one of the things we hope will be as effective also and more immediately effective is our policy whereby the Bureau of Prisons is – instead of deferring to the state or local entity detainer and turning a deportable individual over to them - that instead, Immigration Customs Enforcement or ICE will instead have the ability to step in and exercise their detainer first,” Lynch said. “We have in the past deferred, because again, we work with our state and local colleagues, and we want to make sure that they can in fact adjudicate their cases as well, but particularly where we are dealing with a jurisdiction that essentially is not prone to honoring the ICE detainers – and those vary across the country. They just vary over time and place,” she said. “Our policy’s going to be that ICE will instead have the first detainer, and that individual will go into ICE custody and deportation,” Lynch added.

Lynch explained that as a result of the new policy, there may be local cases that are not prosecuted, because the criminal alien will be taken into ICE custody and deported, but if a jurisdiction has concerns, the DOJ would need assurances that the individual would be returned to ICE custody afterwards. “Now this may have the effect that there may be local cases that may not be able to be prosecuted, because again, the person will be taken into ICE custody and then deported,” Lynch said, “and if a jurisdiction has a concern over that, we will talk to them, but we would have to have assurances that ICE would also then be able to get the individual back at the end of an adjudication so that the deportation process could go underway.” “So we are trying to be respectful of our state and local colleagues’ desires and goals to prosecute cases but also deal with this issue as well,” she added.

MORE