Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The experiment is to see if the meaning of a word (fascism) can be changed by simple repeating. When the books on ideologies change their definitions we know it can be done. So far the educated world has ignored the whole experiment, but it is fun to watch.
I have about eight or nine booklets on ideologies that I acquired while attending college. The first one that I pulled off the shelf was "Political Ideologies" by BaradatThe experiment is to see if the meaning of a word (fascism) can be changed by simple repeating. When the books on ideologies change their definitions we know it can be done. So far the educated world has ignored the whole experiment, but it is fun to watch.
Taking your post literally, which "books on ideologies" did you reference?
Watching this message board it is clear to me that definition is critical when one makes a claim and points fingers.
fascism, communism, totalitarianism, despotism, democracy, republicanism, conservatism and liberalism are all commonly used, and many times as a pejorative.
"I know you are" seems to be the method most used, but never is the cliche finished, "but what am I".
If the poster wants to earn, or recover some credibility, s/he must finish that cliche with what they believe and why.
“The left operates exclusively in the dark” - Steven Crowder
That experiment was successful. The “academics” on the left managed to convince the minions on the left that fascism was “right-wing”.The experiment is to see if the meaning of a word (fascism) can be changed...
There is your problem. You should have pulled “The Road to Surfdom” by Friedrich Hayek off of your shelf. You would be exponentially more enlightened if you had. Here, let me show you:I have about eight or nine booklets on ideologies that I acquired while attending college. The first one that I pulled off the shelf was "Political Ideologies" by Baradat
Isn’t it bizarre how a Nobel Peace Prize recipient and holder of 3 doctorates (including one in political science) would claim that the next stage after communism would be all the way on the opposite end of the spectrum according to you?!?"Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion" - Friedrich Hayek
How interesting...Republicans keep insisting that Hitler was a liberal and a socialist but for some strange reason, Nazis keep running for office as Republicans, AND WINNING.
Why don't Republicans just start telling these people that they should run as Democrats? After all, it's their pet theory, isn't it?
Self-described Nazis and white supremacists are running as Republicans across the country. The GOP is terrified.
Additionally, these swastika bearing nimrods keep showing up at rallies like "Unite the Right" in Charlottesville.
Apparently, if the revisionism is actually correct, these people are marching in the wrong rallies.
So, after 113 pages of continual ad nausuem bullshit, it is time to tell the revisionists to go pound sand up their asses.
Hitler was a fascist, and fascists are on the Right of the political spectrum, case closed, end of story.
So Adolf Hitler believed in small, limited government, did he?Hitler was a fascist, and fascists are on the Right of the political spectrum, case closed, end of story.
There is nothing tolerant or “diverse” about the left. Absolutely nothing. They will not tolerate even the slightest deviation from their rigid and frightening doctrine. Case in point:For all the predictable speechifying about “diversity” that I heard at cocktail parties and literary events, I became struck by just how politically monolithic this scene really is. It’s not just that writers and editors have to be PC when it comes to their books and their public pronouncements: There also seems to be a crushing uniformity in regard to their privately held viewpoints.
Chilling. The left will no longer engage in intellectualism. Not only will they not ask questions in the search for answers, solutions, or a better way, they won’t even tolerate someone else asking questions.When I cut to the chase and asked why no one at the table seemed to feel aggrieved for women suffering under Islamic oppression, voices were raised and, well, I may or may not have been asked to leave. There were other experiences like this, and I learned to hold my tongue.
How interesting...Republicans keep insisting that Hitler was a liberal and a socialist but for some strange reason, Nazis keep running for office as Republicans, AND WINNING.
Why don't Republicans just start telling these people that they should run as Democrats? After all, it's their pet theory, isn't it?
Self-described Nazis and white supremacists are running as Republicans across the country. The GOP is terrified.
The left doing what it always does. Changing their sex and resorting to violence...
The left has literally become the Nazis. Just a bunch of mindless fascists who will not tolerate even a simple question.
There is nothing tolerant or “diverse” about the left. Absolutely nothing. They will not tolerate even the slightest deviation from their rigid and frightening doctrine.For all the predictable speechifying about “diversity” that I heard at cocktail parties and literary events, I became struck by just how politically monolithic this scene really is. It’s not just that writers and editors have to be PC when it comes to their books and their public pronouncements: There also seems to be a crushing uniformity in regard to their privately held viewpoints.
Case in point:
Chilling. The left will no longer engage in intellectualism. Not only will they not ask questions in the search for answers, solutions, or a better way, they won’t even tolerate someone else asking questions.When I cut to the chase and asked why no one at the table seemed to feel aggrieved for women suffering under Islamic oppression, voices were raised and, well, I may or may not have been asked to leave. There were other experiences like this, and I learned to hold my tongue.
A Glimpse Into the Ideological Monoculture of Literary New York - Quillette
Now that the left has embraced a strict fascist ideology that will not tolerate the slightest dissent or deviation from their narrative, a “Journal of Controversial Ideas” is more important than ever. The facts, the truth, and the science must be pursued at all costs, despite the persecution from Antifa and other progressive groups.“What we’re interested in is giving people a voice,” says Minerva, “because if you don’t publish controversial things, then you might be missing something really important.”
Now that the left has embraced a strict fascist ideology that will not tolerate the slightest dissent or deviation from their narrative, a “Journal of Controversial Ideas” is more important than ever. The facts, the truth, and the science must be pursued at all costs, despite the persecution from Antifa and other progressive groups.“What we’re interested in is giving people a voice,” says Minerva, “because if you don’t publish controversial things, then you might be missing something really important.”
The U.S. was built on freedom of speech, free thought, etc. Now, scholars are petrified to even create a paper. It's worse than Hitler's Germany. Exactly what the left wanted.These days, a paper that’s deemed offensive can unleash an online mob and turn an academic’s career and life upside down. It can also cause a journal editor to tiptoe away from a potentially important paper or a scholar not to put fingers to keyboard in the first place.
No outcry just a dose of US history. The second president of the United States along with the conservatives of that time, the Federalists under, Adams, passed the Sedition Act that made it a crime to criticize Federalist politicians. Jefferson claimed the Act violated the Bill of Rights. It was the end of America's first conservative party,What a sad indictment on what the left has done to the United States...
The U.S. was built on freedom of speech, free thought, etc. Now, scholars are petrified to even create a paper. It's worse than Hitler's Germany. Exactly what the left wanted.These days, a paper that’s deemed offensive can unleash an online mob and turn an academic’s career and life upside down. It can also cause a journal editor to tiptoe away from a potentially important paper or a scholar not to put fingers to keyboard in the first place.
Here Comes ‘The Journal of Controversial Ideas.’ Cue the Outcry.
One problem hon. The federalists were the progressives. They wanted to expand the size, scope, and power of the federal government (and sadly, they were successful). They were lead by Alexander Hamilton.No outcry just a dose of US history. The second president of the United States along with the conservatives of that time, the Federalists under, Adams, passed the Sedition Act that made it a crime to criticize Federalist politicians. Jefferson claimed the Act violated the Bill of Rights. It was the end of America's first conservative party,
An InfoTainment channel; good capitalists make money not lose money.Unless the left completely controls the content and every facet of this, they are going to freak out over it and resort to violence to shut it down.
Now that the left has embraced a strict fascist ideology that will not tolerate the slightest dissent or deviation from their narrative, a “Journal of Controversial Ideas” is more important than ever. The facts, the truth, and the science must be pursued at all costs, despite the persecution from Antifa and other progressive groups.“What we’re interested in is giving people a voice,” says Minerva, “because if you don’t publish controversial things, then you might be missing something really important.”
Here Comes ‘The Journal of Controversial Ideas.’ Cue the Outcry.
I see you haven't taken your Latin class yet.The left has literally become the Nazis. Just a bunch of mindless fascists who will not tolerate even a simple question.
There is nothing tolerant or “diverse” about the left. Absolutely nothing. They will not tolerate even the slightest deviation from their rigid and frightening doctrine. Case in point:For all the predictable speechifying about “diversity” that I heard at cocktail parties and literary events, I became struck by just how politically monolithic this scene really is. It’s not just that writers and editors have to be PC when it comes to their books and their public pronouncements: There also seems to be a crushing uniformity in regard to their privately held viewpoints.
Chilling. The left will no longer engage in intellectualism. Not only will they not ask questions in the search for answers, solutions, or a better way, they won’t even tolerate someone else asking questions.When I cut to the chase and asked why no one at the table seemed to feel aggrieved for women suffering under Islamic oppression, voices were raised and, well, I may or may not have been asked to leave. There were other experiences like this, and I learned to hold my tongue.
A Glimpse Into the Ideological Monoculture of Literary New York - Quillette
