The majority of you that suffer your TDS politically based opinions is BIASED on...

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

healthmyths is babbling again.

 

[alang1216]

Look at this chart. Your TDS and Trump's politics opinions are biased based on the following facts:

1) 55% of journalists says that every side doesn't deserve equal coverage.
Now the proof of this is the following articles that show the MSM donated 96% to Hillary and 90% Biden including--
2) From June 1 through July 31, the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts focused 512 minutes of airtime on the President, or nine times more than the 58 minutes allotted to Biden,” it continued.
During these two months, our analysts documented 668 evaluative statements about the President, 95% of which (634) were negative, vs. a mere 5% (34) that were positive.”
In contrast, 67% of the evaluative statements about Mr. Biden are positive.
“Do the math, and viewers heard 150 times more negative comments about Trump than Biden. That’s not news reporting — that’s a negative advertising campaign in action,” the study said.

Broadcast coverage of Trump 95% negative, according to new study

Negative press coverage of President Trump has worsened. Since 2016, previous studies from analysts at the Media Research Center revealed that press coverage of Mr. Trump on major broadcast networks was 91% negative. It has gotten worse. A new study released Monday found that the coverage is now...

www.washingtontimes.com

View attachment 971588

https://img.semafor.com/de701656eb2884ba2d05637ba010c73161210284-852x682.jpg

View attachment 971578

Chicken or egg? So the people who follow politics the closest, who know the most about the people and the process, favor the Dems? Doesn't surprise me.

 

[healthmyths]

Chicken or egg? So the people who follow politics the closest, who know the most about the people and the process, favor the Dems? Doesn't surprise me.

I took several journalism classes in college in the early 1960s and learned that newspeople, should adhere to the 5 "Ws".... Who, What, When, Where and Why.
What has happened though is the "WHY" has taken precedence!
Case in point...
When JFK donated his salary to charities there was NO mention like these descriptions of Trump:

Fact check: President Donald Trump donates his salary, but he still makes money​

Fact check: President Donald Trump donates his salary, but he still makes money

Social media claims that President Donald Trump works for no money are not totally accurate.

www.usatoday.com

But there never were headlines in the 1960s making such a statement about Democrats JFK.... being a multi-millionaire family real-estate holding empire. zero.
BACK then NO questions about JFK's sources, etc. and why he was able to donate his salary!
Joseph Kennedy Sr., starting from a solidly middle class family in Boston, created a fortune that gave his children and grandchildren the freedom to pursue public service. Kennedy’s business ventures included banking, stock trading, producing movies and selling liquor. He thought to get out of the stock market before the crash of 1929 — after the major devaluation of everyone else’s portfolios, his family was only more wealthy during the Great Depression, in the 1930s.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

JFKJr was a playboy, but he did not assault women like Trump,.
His grandad and dad ran booze but did fleece charities and universities,
None of them misused immigrant labor.
JFKJr, as flawed as he was, pisses down on Trump.

 

[alang1216]

I took several journalism classes in college in the early 1960s and learned that newspeople, should adhere to the 5 "Ws".... Who, What, When, Where and Why.
What has happened though is the "WHY" has taken precedence!
Case in point...
When JFK donated his salary to charities there was NO mention like these descriptions of Trump:

Fact check: President Donald Trump donates his salary, but he still makes money​

Fact check: President Donald Trump donates his salary, but he still makes money

Social media claims that President Donald Trump works for no money are not totally accurate.

www.usatoday.com

But there never were headlines in the 1960s making such a statement about Democrats JFK.... being a multi-millionaire family real-estate holding empire. zero.
BACK then NO questions about JFK's sources, etc. and why he was able to donate his salary!
Joseph Kennedy Sr., starting from a solidly middle class family in Boston, created a fortune that gave his children and grandchildren the freedom to pursue public service. Kennedy’s business ventures included banking, stock trading, producing movies and selling liquor. He thought to get out of the stock market before the crash of 1929 — after the major devaluation of everyone else’s portfolios, his family was only more wealthy during the Great Depression, in the 1930s.

Not sure what your point is but things were different back then. President's families were pretty much off limits and mistresses were never mentioned.