The Most Famous Fakes In Science

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

Such an angry fundie. Curious, though, For all your whining about debate with atheists being impossible, it is you who ran from debate. Like a petulant child, you got angry when your specious opinions were refuted which caused you to claim to put others on ignore.

Looks more like debate with religionists is impossible.

They’re mentally conflicted. They put up a wall. Essentially, they’re afraid of everything. Yet, they think they know a big secrete that the rest of us don’t.

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

You have no idea what an athiest is. Define it.

 

[Indeependent]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

Such an angry fundie. Curious, though, For all your whining about debate with atheists being impossible, it is you who ran from debate. Like a petulant child, you got angry when your specious opinions were refuted which caused you to claim to put others on ignore.

Looks more like debate with religionists is impossible.

They’re mentally conflicted. They put up a wall. Essentially, they’re afraid of everything. Yet, they think they know a big secrete that the rest of us don’t.

What wall?
I painted the only possible scenario and the only response by atheists has been, "Up yours!".
Atheists are so erudite.

 

[Indeependent]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

Such an angry fundie. Curious, though, For all your whining about debate with atheists being impossible, it is you who ran from debate. Like a petulant child, you got angry when your specious opinions were refuted which caused you to claim to put others on ignore.

Looks more like debate with religionists is impossible.

There's no debate as you are no responding to the only possible scenario because you can't.
You can't find one evolutionist who addresses this issue head on?
Of course not; because it can't be explained as a chance occurrence.

 

[Indeependent]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

Cool...prove you're not an idiot by addressing the Slime planning male/female pairs in the millions over close to a billion years.

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

Cool...prove you're not an idiot by addressing the Slime planning male/female pairs in the millions over close to a billion years.

You just proved you are an idiot by asking a stupid question.

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

Such an angry fundie. Curious, though, For all your whining about debate with atheists being impossible, it is you who ran from debate. Like a petulant child, you got angry when your specious opinions were refuted which caused you to claim to put others on ignore.

Looks more like debate with religionists is impossible.

They’re mentally conflicted. They put up a wall. Essentially, they’re afraid of everything. Yet, they think they know a big secrete that the rest of us don’t.

What wall?
I painted the only possible scenario and the only response by atheists has been, "Up yours!".
Atheists are so erudite.The

So, what’s an atheist ?

 

[Indeependent]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

Cool...prove you're not an idiot by addressing the Slime planning male/female pairs in the millions over close to a billion years.

You just proved you are an idiot by asking a stupid question.

Translation...
Ad hominem because you can't address the issue.

 

[Indeependent]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

Such an angry fundie. Curious, though, For all your whining about debate with atheists being impossible, it is you who ran from debate. Like a petulant child, you got angry when your specious opinions were refuted which caused you to claim to put others on ignore.

Looks more like debate with religionists is impossible.

They’re mentally conflicted. They put up a wall. Essentially, they’re afraid of everything. Yet, they think they know a big secrete that the rest of us don’t.

What wall?
I painted the only possible scenario and the only response by atheists has been, "Up yours!".
Atheists are so erudite.The

So, what’s an atheist ?

An arrogant person who wants to be beholden to no one or anything.
I have never met an atheist who wasn't arrogant, regardless of the topic being addressed.

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

Cool...prove you're not an idiot by addressing the Slime planning male/female pairs in the millions over close to a billion years.

Sounds like another Conservative gay guy who can’t find the key to get out of the closet.

 

[Indeependent]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

Cool...prove you're not an idiot by addressing the Slime planning male/female pairs in the millions over close to a billion years.

Sounds like another Conservative gay guy who can’t find the key to get out of the closet.

This is my last response to you on this Thread because you're an idiot.
Now please and post something above Sesame Street level.

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

Such an angry fundie. Curious, though, For all your whining about debate with atheists being impossible, it is you who ran from debate. Like a petulant child, you got angry when your specious opinions were refuted which caused you to claim to put others on ignore.

Looks more like debate with religionists is impossible.

They’re mentally conflicted. They put up a wall. Essentially, they’re afraid of everything. Yet, they think they know a big secrete that the rest of us don’t.

What wall?
I painted the only possible scenario and the only response by atheists has been, "Up yours!".
Atheists are so erudite.The

So, what’s an atheist ?

An arrogant person who wants to be beholden to no one or anything.
I have never met an atheist who wasn't arrogant, regardless of the topic being addressed.

Never met a creationist who didn’t sound dumb as rock regardless of the topic being discussed. Very Trumpian.

Still can’t define an atheist ? Thought so. Just call then all socialist.

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

Cool...prove you're not an idiot by addressing the Slime planning male/female pairs in the millions over close to a billion years.

Sounds like another Conservative gay guy who can’t find the key to get out of the closet.

This is my last response to you on this Thread because you're an idiot.
Now please and post something above Sesame Street level.

That is for all the favors twinkle toes.

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

Cool...prove you're not an idiot by addressing the Slime planning male/female pairs in the millions over close to a billion years.

Sounds like another Conservative gay guy who can’t find the key to get out of the closet.

This is my last response to you on this Thread because you're an idiot.
Now please and post something above Sesame Street level.

Christianity ? Which one is that ? The one that believes in evolution or the one that old white guys get to marry more then one wife and underaged girls. Sounds like a gig to collect money.m

 

[Dagosa]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

More BS. You dont even know what an atheist is ?
Is a Muslim or Jew or a nudist an Athiest ? They don’t Bellevue in your God. But somehow, you’ve elevated everyone who believes in ghosts above these who want evidence.

Cool...prove you're not an idiot by addressing the Slime planning male/female pairs in the millions over close to a billion years.

Sounds like another Conservative gay guy who can’t find the key to get out of the closet.

This is my last response to you on this Thread because you're an idiot.
Now please and post something above Sesame Street level.

Move on sucker.
Jerry Falwell needs a tithing.

 

[Dagosa]

What is Darwin's Theory of Evolution?

Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution is one of the most solid theories in science. But what exactly is it?

www.livescience.com

 

[Hollie]

My community probably has more hard science professionals than you’ll ever meet in your life and they approve of his legislation.

Anyone can examine the very long list of Jews who were awarded Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, economics, medicine, you name it. There is a longer list of Christian Laureates simply because Christianity is the largest organization in the history of man.

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

AreAtheistsRight.blogspot.com

Debate with atheists is impossible. They are bitter, condescending, and can't stick to the subject when it is science. They always regress to the Bible, which they deny but quote relentlessly. I critiqued several books by Richard Dawkins and he acts just like all the others, ignoring the points I made and attacking me personally. It's not about me. It's about his jejune ignorance and incoherence. He never wants to address those points.

Such an angry fundie. Curious, though, For all your whining about debate with atheists being impossible, it is you who ran from debate. Like a petulant child, you got angry when your specious opinions were refuted which caused you to claim to put others on ignore.

Looks more like debate with religionists is impossible.

There's no debate as you are no responding to the only possible scenario because you can't.
You can't find one evolutionist who addresses this issue head on?
Of course not; because it can't be explained as a chance occurrence.

What issue are you claiming an evolutionist can't address?

How does a religionist address such an issue?

 

[Dagosa]

An arrogant person who wants to be beholden to no one or anything.

No where in any dictionary is that the definition of an atheist.
By your definition, priest and pastors who molest children and the David Koresh lead Band who were beholding to their leader would be fine with you.


Only when a religion becomes moderate and benign and believes science and not fairytales does it serve man kind properly.

 

[PoliticalChic]

have no idea what you are talking about as you are putting words in my mouth. Why don't you give some examples so I and others here know what Jewish statements from the Torah you are referring to? Let's see if you know anything?

You do understand that every food you eat and vaccine you’ve ever used was augmented by Evolution theory and knowledge from Darwin and others supplemented by work from Gregor Mendel a Christian and other others in genetics.

Charles Darwin is screaming his arse off in Hades being one of the burning dead and not sleeping dead. Father Gregor Mendel's work was for creation science. He was no Darwinian because Darwin needed over 4 billion years while Mendel needed "successive generations" and coined that phrase. As I stated atheists are usually wrong and Darwin was wrong with his pangenesis hypothesis of inheritance. You know very well Mendel was right because he followed and practiced real science.

Where do you get off claiming that what ? Jews are atheist and Catholics have been lead astray ? Because why ? They don’t beleive in the fairy god father ?

I have no idea what you are talking about as you are putting words in my mouth.

Of course you don’t understand , you’re ignorant.
Genetics is the mechanism of evolution and Gregor Mendel work with pea pods became a foundation in the understanding of genetics.

Case closed. Don’t go out in the real world around educated people, they’ll laugh at you.

d


You are clueless in so many ways.
Mendel had no use for Darwin, and Mendel's work was correct, Darwin's wrong.


According to Mendel, “heredity involves the transmission of stable factors that determine an organism’s traits. Although the factors can be mixed and matched during reproduction, they remain discrete and unchanging from one generation to the next.” Although we now use the term ‘gene,’ the term didn’t come about until 1909.



“Darwin’s view of heredity was quite different. He believed that every cell in an organism produces “gemmules” that transmit characteristics to the next generation in a blending process he called “pangenesis.” The advantage of Darwin’s view was that gemmules could be changed by external conditions, or by use and disuse, and thus account for evolutionary change. The disadvantage of Dar- win’s view was that it was false.” Charles Darwin, The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication ,

Chapter XXVII. Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, Sixth Edition, Chapter

V. See also Chapters I and VI. Bowler, Evolution: The History of an Idea, 171, 190,

210, 250–52. (comment by Jonathan Wells)



Today, no one believes that ‘use and disuse’ idea, soooo….where did those ‘variations’ come from?