the_human_being
Gold Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 15,277
- 2,741
A few observations:
(a) The Federal Government has no legitimate power to spend money on education or healthcare. Read the Constitution; it won't take long.
(b) The problems with "education" will not be solved by an infusion of more money, whether it originates with the Feds or the State governments, nor are any of our significant educational "problems" the result of not enough money. The proof of this fact is staring us in the face. Public education spending, both absolutely and on a per-pupil basis has skyrocketed in the past five decades at a rate far greater than inflation, and we have bupkis to show for it. More money: more waste.
(c) Sending more Americans (and illegal aliens) to college is a preposterous prescription for any problem we may be experiencing. No more than 25% of any society can be "leaders" (the ostensible purpose of colleges and universities), and we are already sending more than half of our high school grads to college. As a result, the colleges are wasting resources on remedial and bullshit courses to accommodate the millions of students who are simply not "college material."
(d) The U.S. is the world's only "Superpower," and MUST spend more on military readiness and operations than any other country. Without the threat of U.S. military action, many parts of the world would quickly devolve into barbaric, Darwinian hell-holes, where countries would constantly attack the neighboring countries they perceive to be weaker. What would China and North Korea be doing today without the threat of U.S. counter-measures? What would Russia be doing? Look at the harm that Barry's incompetence has already done. Would Israel even exist if we backed down? "Cutting military spending" is a childish, sophomoric, unserious form of thought masturbation.
(e) Yes, we ARE much safer as a result of the dramatic increase in incarcerations. It is almost laughable at how often one hears news "reporters" puzzling over why prison populations have exploded "even though" the serious crime rates are down. Their inability to see the obvious connection is hilarious.
(f) Countries that have socialized medicine made a formal decision to go in that direction many decades ago, and developed their healthcare delivery systems (and the tax provisions to fund it) accordingly. The Government owns the hospitals and clinics, employs the doctors, nurses, and other practitioners, and controls the vast majority of spending. Even if you ignore the fact that the U.S. government is constitutionally prohibited from doing the same here, our entire healthcare delivery system has evolved under ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PARADIGMS. Our doctors are NOT going to go to work for the government; the government is not going to buy the hospitals, and the health insurance industry (which would be essentially superfluous) is not going to go away over night.
The Democrat presidential campaign is basically a sham. Regardless of who wins, we will have an utterly predictable continuation of the Obama policies, appointment of more lawless federal judges and justices, and the continued erosion of the application of the U.S. Constitution. The only question to be decided by the primary voters is whether HRC is SO odious a candidate that she could actually lose, so that someone else would have to be plugged in to take her place. If it appears that Democrat voters are going that way (i.e., rejecting HRC), then Joe Biden (or Al Gore?) will step in, but the result will be the same.
The election will ultimately be determined by the turnout of white, working-class people, who are the only constituency who can outnumber the freaks and government teat-suckers who will massively vote for whomever the Dems nominate.
We have five times the number of incarcerations than we did before the "war on drugs"
Incarcerating non violent offenders, three strikes rules for minor offenses, mandatory sentencing for drug offenders...all have escallated our prison population without making us safer
I'm not one of them.