healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,029
- 10,519
- 900
- Thread starter
- #21
Isn't that the entire democrat mantra though? YOU are not capable of tasking care of yourself. The government must do it. Even though you could do infinately better on your own.By "millionaires" do you mean people with at least one million per year in total income? Or people with a net worth of at least a million dollars?
The net worth estimates MUST BE skewed by grotesquely inflated real estate values in certain select areas. And we've seen how sound that is.
Capitalism has failed SOME Americans - the ones who for one reason or another don't or can't take advantage of the rampant prosperity.
And the insidious problem is that there are thousands of "leaders" out there who spend all their time trying to convince people that THEY CAN'T succeed, either because of their race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion or general fucked-upedess. And people eat it up, because it gives them an excuse for their laziness and lack of capacity...it's NOT THEIR FAULT, you see. It's the fault of the System, the Mann, Racists, Donald Trump, or whatever.
In fact, any Leftists reading the OP are spitting mad at you and anyone like you for implying that there is a lot of prosperity in American, and all one has to do to get it is to....well, GET IT.
Totally agree.
Case in point these same democrats are so against any mention of privatizing SS that drives them into a frenzy.
BUT we recently heard that:
The concepts of solvency, sustainability, and budget impact are common in discussions of Social Security, but are not well understood. Currently, the Social Security Board of Trustees projects program cost to rise by 2035 so that taxes will be enough to pay for only 75 percent of scheduled benefits.
The Future Financial Status of the Social Security Program
So what would happen if though any American working today under age 55 could have a choice:
A) Continue with SS as it is
B) or be able to tell SS where to put the payments... put into bank...treasures, bonds, stock market, mutual finds, etc.
So what would happen to a young worker starting out today after college with first job say paying $50,000 a year.
SS payments by employee and employer would be 6.2% each...i.e. employee deduction would be $6,200.
Assume employee never makes any more than $50,000 and stays with employer for 30 years cumulatively each paying over 30 years $186,000.
Assume employee would then be able to tell SS "put this money into XYZ mutual fund along with future payments."
mutual funds over the last 30 years. Mutual funds had a 3.66% average return.
Average Mutual Fund Return
Using an interest calculator: 30 years adding $6,200 per year with above average mutual fund return of 3.66% would mean $358,876.
And that's with no salary increase over 30 years!
What would it be if every 10 years the employee's salary increase 20% over 10 years?
$50,000/year first 10... $60,000/year 2nd 10.... and last 10 years $72,000/year.
The value would be then: End of 10 years $84,838... End of 2nd 10 years: $212,683 and at end of 30 years... over $414,000.
Now if the employee had been studious, lucky and stuck with it and chose Fidelity Magellan fund with over 40 years appreciation of 14.8%/year.
Employee would have $3,540,529!!
All because the SS let this employee tell them where to invest his/employer's SS payments!