The news is out Trump Campaign obstructed

[Wyatt earp]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Only crooks want to defund the police

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

 

[kaz]

First, you said it was "factually" inaccurate. That's a lie, it wasn't. You mean you disagreed with what he implied. But his fact was completely accurate.

I explained what was inaccurate, you’re free to ignore it, but it’s there. The matter did not “go away”.

Secondly, it is baseless. If it isn’t baseless, you should be able to show me one scrap of evidence which connects the two, but you can’t.

If you didn't have double standards, you'd have none at all.

The fact that an unethical meeting happened right before it was dropped IS evidence. If we switched parties, you'd suddenly get that

If that’s the sum total of all evidence that these two events are connected, that’s an astonishingly weak case which you would never accept if the parties were switched.

You're a liar. I didn't say it was proof of guilt, I said it was evidence. I already directly addressed that and said if the parties were switched it would still be unethical, it would. I did not say it's proof of guilt either way. It's not my opinion it's unethical, it's the opinion of the bar association. Either way it should be investigated and probably reported to the bar.

You on the other hand took something which is clearly legally unethical and declared it no evidence at all.

You're just pulling crap out of your ass now. Keep it there, it stinks

 

[kaz]

Have a link for that?

I'll look but it was just a headline on MCNBC Let me ask you IF it is true as stated would you give a damn???

You know the answer to that they don't care how he won.

Yep!

Lie, Cheat, or Steal

These Trump Deranged Sycophants,

Will make every excuse in the world for their Satanistsc god

They too, will LIE, cheat or Steal for their U.S. Traitor......

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

THAT MEANS, Trump never legally won the election in 2016......period.


Besides destroying this nation's democratic Republic, and cheating, Trump also committed perjury.... lock him up!

And the Trump brainwashed followers who deny the truth on this site, can kiss my grits!

And are you seeing sugar plum fairies and pink elephants this morning too?

Whatever she sees
It is never what is really there.

It is what it is Trump is a disgusting lying bullying crook and he's all yours patriots lol

I see you've gotten a hold of Joe Dementia Biden's insult book. BTW, you forgot dog faced pony soldier ...

 

[kaz]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

Russia took out some facebook ads. Americans can't do that, only foreign governments can. Those facebook ads cost Hillary the election. I mean it was like hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Hmm. I need help with that, Care4Democrats. I'm new to parroting DNC talking points, but that doesn't make sense. I know you keep telling me to repeat don't think, but man ...

 

[colfax_m]

First, you said it was "factually" inaccurate. That's a lie, it wasn't. You mean you disagreed with what he implied. But his fact was completely accurate.

I explained what was inaccurate, you’re free to ignore it, but it’s there. The matter did not “go away”.

Secondly, it is baseless. If it isn’t baseless, you should be able to show me one scrap of evidence which connects the two, but you can’t.

If you didn't have double standards, you'd have none at all.

The fact that an unethical meeting happened right before it was dropped IS evidence. If we switched parties, you'd suddenly get that

If that’s the sum total of all evidence that these two events are connected, that’s an astonishingly weak case which you would never accept if the parties were switched.

You're a liar. I didn't say it was proof of guilt, I said it was evidence. I already directly addressed that and said if the parties were switched it would still be unethical, it would. I did not say it's proof of guilt either way. It's not my opinion it's unethical, it's the opinion of the bar association. Either way it should be investigated and probably reported to the bar.

You on the other hand took something which is clearly legally unethical and declared it no evidence at all.

You're just pulling crap out of your ass now. Keep it there, it stinks

Who cares if it was unethical? That's irrelevant. What I said is that there is no evidence to support that the tarmac meeting had anything to do with the lack of charges for Clinton. Attempting to claim the mere fact the meeting happened is not sufficient evidence. As for whether it should be investigated, sure, why not?

Guess what...

IT WAS INVESTIGATED.

And found to be baseless.

 

[colfax_m]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.

 

[kaz]

Who cares if it was unethical?

You would incredibly care ... if it were Republicans ...

That's irrelevant. What I said is that there is no evidence to support that the tarmac meeting had anything to do with the lack of charges for Clinton. Attempting to claim the mere fact the meeting happened is not sufficient evidence. As for whether it should be investigated, sure, why not?

Guess what...

IT WAS INVESTIGATED.

And found to be baseless.

Who investigated it? Say what?

Once again since you're stupid. The meeting on the tarmac WAS evidence. That's what I said the first time. No, it was not proof of guilt in itself, which is what you changed what I said to. But apparently Crooks and Liars investigated and you're satisfied with that

 

[westwall]

First, you said it was "factually" inaccurate. That's a lie, it wasn't. You mean you disagreed with what he implied. But his fact was completely accurate.

I explained what was inaccurate, you’re free to ignore it, but it’s there. The matter did not “go away”.

Secondly, it is baseless. If it isn’t baseless, you should be able to show me one scrap of evidence which connects the two, but you can’t.

If you didn't have double standards, you'd have none at all.

The fact that an unethical meeting happened right before it was dropped IS evidence. If we switched parties, you'd suddenly get that

If that’s the sum total of all evidence that these two events are connected, that’s an astonishingly weak case which you would never accept if the parties were switched.

You're a liar. I didn't say it was proof of guilt, I said it was evidence. I already directly addressed that and said if the parties were switched it would still be unethical, it would. I did not say it's proof of guilt either way. It's not my opinion it's unethical, it's the opinion of the bar association. Either way it should be investigated and probably reported to the bar.

You on the other hand took something which is clearly legally unethical and declared it no evidence at all.

You're just pulling crap out of your ass now. Keep it there, it stinks

Who cares if it was unethical? That's irrelevant. What I said is that there is no evidence to support that the tarmac meeting had anything to do with the lack of charges for Clinton. Attempting to claim the mere fact the meeting happened is not sufficient evidence. As for whether it should be investigated, sure, why not?

Guess what...

IT WAS INVESTIGATED.

And found to be baseless.

Bullshit. The fact that they lied about what they talked about is prima facie evidence of a corrupt act. But it's a Clinton so you don't care.

You are dismissed again. Child.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

Russia took out some facebook ads. Americans can't do that, only foreign governments can. Those facebook ads cost Hillary the election. I mean it was like hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Hmm. I need help with that, Care4Democrats. I'm new to parroting DNC talking points, but that doesn't make sense. I know you keep telling me to repeat don't think, but man ...

Russia took out some facebook ads.

Those were some super ads.
More powerful than the billion plus dollars the Dems spent on ads.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.

Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.

Making Dem wrongdoing public must have really hurt Hillary.

 

[Care4all]

Who cares if it was unethical?

You would incredibly care ... if it were Republicans ...

That's irrelevant. What I said is that there is no evidence to support that the tarmac meeting had anything to do with the lack of charges for Clinton. Attempting to claim the mere fact the meeting happened is not sufficient evidence. As for whether it should be investigated, sure, why not?

Guess what...

IT WAS INVESTIGATED.

And found to be baseless.

Who investigated it? Say what?

Once again since you're stupid. The meeting on the tarmac WAS evidence. That's what I said the first time. No, it was not proof of guilt in itself, which is what you changed what I said to. But apparently Crooks and Liars investigated and you're satisfied with that

The tarmac meet up was investigated by the Inspector General at the request of Republican law makers...

AND nothing nefarious took place.

End of story.

 

[kaz]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

Russia took out some facebook ads. Americans can't do that, only foreign governments can. Those facebook ads cost Hillary the election. I mean it was like hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Hmm. I need help with that, Care4Democrats. I'm new to parroting DNC talking points, but that doesn't make sense. I know you keep telling me to repeat don't think, but man ...

Russia took out some facebook ads.

Those were some super ads.
More powerful than the billion plus dollars the Dems spent on ads.

I like that Democrats can't process that the reason they lost was they picked a totally shitty candidate. The worst ever. Hillary is arrogant, corrupt and just unpleasant to listen to. It's great they won't accept that because they just did it again with Dementia Joe. You have to see your mistakes to not repeat them, and they just don't

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Lock him up!!!

Cute comment...considering the 1st of Barry's administration / FBI are beginning to plead guilty, be indicted, and go to jail.

Bwuhahahahaha......

.

For you easy
Kerry delivered some of the strongest words of the night against Trump, especially concerning matters of foreign policy.

“Donald Trump pretends Russia didn’t attack our elections. And now, he does nothing about Russia putting a bounty on our troops,” Kerry said in reference to U.S. intelligence findings. “So he won’t defend our country. He doesn’t know how to defend our troops. The only person he’s interested in defending is himself.”

Kerry has also been criticized by Trump for his role in pushing the U.S. to join the Paris Agreement on climate change, which Trump has also rejected. Those moves and more, Kerry said, have made Trump a laughing stock around the world.

Kerry is a dope of historical consequence whose self-prostrating diplomatic style caused endless problems with both enemies and allies. That all he and Obama shat out upon America has been flushed away with no consequences to ourselves is fortunate indeed.

 

[Care4all]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

Russia took out some facebook ads. Americans can't do that, only foreign governments can. Those facebook ads cost Hillary the election. I mean it was like hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Hmm. I need help with that, Care4Democrats. I'm new to parroting DNC talking points, but that doesn't make sense. I know you keep telling me to repeat don't think, but man ...

Russia took out some facebook ads.

Those were some super ads.
More powerful than the billion plus dollars the Dems spent on ads.

the ads reached 120 MILLION people on Facebook and another 100 million on other social media like Twitter....

 

[colfax_m]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.

Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.

Making Dem wrongdoing public must have really hurt Hillary.

There was no wrongdoing exposed.

 

[colfax_m]

Bullshit. The fact that they lied about what they talked about is prima facie evidence of a corrupt act. But it's a Clinton so you don't care.

You are dismissed again. Child.

Except that nothing came of the meeting. Don't use words you don't understand.

 

[westwall]

Who cares if it was unethical?

You would incredibly care ... if it were Republicans ...

That's irrelevant. What I said is that there is no evidence to support that the tarmac meeting had anything to do with the lack of charges for Clinton. Attempting to claim the mere fact the meeting happened is not sufficient evidence. As for whether it should be investigated, sure, why not?

Guess what...

IT WAS INVESTIGATED.

And found to be baseless.

Who investigated it? Say what?

Once again since you're stupid. The meeting on the tarmac WAS evidence. That's what I said the first time. No, it was not proof of guilt in itself, which is what you changed what I said to. But apparently Crooks and Liars investigated and you're satisfied with that

The tarmac meet up was investigated by the Inspector General at the request of Republican law makers...

AND nothing nefarious took place.

End of story.

Yeah, imagine that, two people meet up and we know bill clinton is a perjury specialist having been disbarred for doing so.

If that had been Trump doing that you would have gone ape shit.

You know it, and we know it.

You ultra partisan whores are all the same.

 

[Wyatt earp]

And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....

What was that Russian help again?

Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.

So we didn't have a right to know the DNC and Hillary rigged the nomination?

 

[colfax_m]

Who investigated it? Say what?

Once again since you're stupid. The meeting on the tarmac WAS evidence. That's what I said the first time. No, it was not proof of guilt in itself, which is what you changed what I said to. But apparently Crooks and Liars investigated and you're satisfied with that

The meeting on the tarmac is not evidence of anything other than that they spoke. Period. This was investigated by the IG. It is baseless.