Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the ads reached 120 MILLION people on Facebook and another 100 million on other social media like Twitter....And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Russia took out some facebook ads. Americans can't do that, only foreign governments can. Those facebook ads cost Hillary the election. I mean it was like hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Hmm. I need help with that, Care4Democrats. I'm new to parroting DNC talking points, but that doesn't make sense. I know you keep telling me to repeat don't think, but man ...
Russia took out some facebook ads.
Those were some super ads.
More powerful than the billion plus dollars the Dems spent on ads.
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.
Making Dem wrongdoing public must have really hurt Hillary.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
Yeah? So? He fucked over your boss pootin so that makes Trump the best ever in my book.
Trump acts like a buffoon, but your boss, pootin, murders people.
Sounds like an easy choice to me. How about you, russki?
Looks to me like Putin is doing just fine. He's probably going to be president for life over there.
Russian voters overwhelmingly back a ploy by President Vladimir Putin to rule until 2036
The referendum paves the way for Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has been in power for two decades, to remain in power until 2036.www.cnn.com
I bet Trump is jealous.
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.
Making Dem wrongdoing public must have really hurt Hillary.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
Emails that exposed no wrongdoing were released by the Russians and cost Hillary the election?
You mean your boss is dictator? Duh. Trump is the only president to tell pootin to go pound sand and Trump allowed US troops to defend themselves when pootins personal mercenary army attacked them. Pootin lost hundreds of his best mercs.
No, pootin, your boss hates Trump and wants him gone which is why you are here trolling away.
Little russki.
www.bbc.com
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.
Making Dem wrongdoing public must have really hurt Hillary.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
Emails that exposed no wrongdoing were released by the Russians and cost Hillary the election?
Not sure if it "cost" her election, but it certainly helped. We could release Trump's financials, it might not show any wrongdoing but it would be damaging.
It wasn't rigged. That's the power of the email hack. It's not what they said, it's what people could make others believe they said.So we didn't have a right to know the DNC and Hillary rigged the nomination?Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Like getting people to believe the nomination was rigged.
Of course the nomination was rigged. Bernie would have been in it up until nearly the end if it were based on actual voting. But the party elites had already clinched it for Hillary. Yeah, Democrats care about democracy, sure you do
Sure. And if the presidential election were based on actual voting, Clinton would be president.
That doesn't even make sense. What are you talking about?
You're being hypocritical. You're saying the DNC is rigged because it doesn't follow the voters, but that's how Trump got elected.
Aw, did I hurt your feewings?Yeah, if you want to know what someone is really like, as someone who hates their ever loving guts. You'll get the unbiased truth that way
Turning a comforting text to a lover into a conspiracy is quite the stretch. Try again.No, it was a serious question.How does them texting love notes affect the investigation? I've never figured out why that was supposed to matter.I'll look but it was just a headline on MCNBC Let me ask you IF it is true as stated would you give a damn???Have a link for that?
Should I?
I seem to remember Obamas Administration was in charge during the Russian investigation.
No comment on them dropping the ball, by FBI agents texting love notes to each other?
Come on Man!!!!
That was a weak dodge.
Why does it matter? How could it have affected anything?
I'm guessing you haven't read the contents of the emails.
Or you have and are just refusing to admit the seriousness of the content of those emails.
So tell me,does this sound familiar to you?
Aug. 8, 2016: L. Page texts Strzok, “[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” and Strzok replies, “No. No he's not. We'll stop it.”21
And here's the rest if you dare to read it.
Fuck Strzok and his Insurance policy he admited to and fuck you ya lying weasel.
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.
Making Dem wrongdoing public must have really hurt Hillary.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
Emails that exposed no wrongdoing were released by the Russians and cost Hillary the election?
Not sure if it "cost" her election, but it certainly helped. We could release Trump's financials, it might not show any wrongdoing but it would be damaging.
Not sure if it "cost" her election, but it certainly helped.
Why would emails, with nothing bad in them, harm Clinton?
Turning a comforting text to a lover into a conspiracy is quite the stretch. Try again.No, it was a serious question.How does them texting love notes affect the investigation? I've never figured out why that was supposed to matter.I'll look but it was just a headline on MCNBC Let me ask you IF it is true as stated would you give a damn???Have a link for that?
Should I?
I seem to remember Obamas Administration was in charge during the Russian investigation.
No comment on them dropping the ball, by FBI agents texting love notes to each other?
Come on Man!!!!
That was a weak dodge.
Why does it matter? How could it have affected anything?
I'm guessing you haven't read the contents of the emails.
Or you have and are just refusing to admit the seriousness of the content of those emails.
So tell me,does this sound familiar to you?
Aug. 8, 2016: L. Page texts Strzok, “[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” and Strzok replies, “No. No he's not. We'll stop it.”21
And here's the rest if you dare to read it.
Fuck Strzok and his Insurance policy he admited to and fuck you ya lying weasel.
It was actual voting, that's how my country works, Trump won the ECIt wasn't rigged. That's the power of the email hack. It's not what they said, it's what people could make others believe they said.So we didn't have a right to know the DNC and Hillary rigged the nomination?Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Like getting people to believe the nomination was rigged.
Of course the nomination was rigged. Bernie would have been in it up until nearly the end if it were based on actual voting. But the party elites had already clinched it for Hillary. Yeah, Democrats care about democracy, sure you do
Sure. And if the presidential election were based on actual voting, Clinton would be president.
Alright, let's roll it back. Trump is an idiot. He lies. He's a fraud. He's a troll. That's not being a better candidate. That's tapping into rage and hatred or the stupidity of the electorate.Aw, did I hurt your feewings?Yeah, if you want to know what someone is really like, as someone who hates their ever loving guts. You'll get the unbiased truth that way
That doesn't even make sense. This is several posts in a row from you that don't even make logical sense in the discussion. I guess that's what butt hurt does to you
Debbie had to step down, they rigged the nomination, everyone knows itHacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.
Making Dem wrongdoing public must have really hurt Hillary.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
Emails that exposed no wrongdoing were released by the Russians and cost Hillary the election?
Not sure if it "cost" her election, but it certainly helped. We could release Trump's financials, it might not show any wrongdoing but it would be damaging.
Not sure if it "cost" her election, but it certainly helped.
Why would emails, with nothing bad in them, harm Clinton?
"Bad" and "wrongdoing" are different concepts, and you've used them interchangeably.
As I said, it's not that there was anything wrong, but that they could be portrayed as such. As other posters have said, people have the impression that those emails demonstrated the DNC rigged the election, which is not true.
The EC doesn't reflect the voters. It reflects the votes transformed by an arbitrary system of electoral votes.It was actual voting, that's how my country works, Trump won the ECIt wasn't rigged. That's the power of the email hack. It's not what they said, it's what people could make others believe they said.So we didn't have a right to know the DNC and Hillary rigged the nomination?Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Like getting people to believe the nomination was rigged.
Of course the nomination was rigged. Bernie would have been in it up until nearly the end if it were based on actual voting. But the party elites had already clinched it for Hillary. Yeah, Democrats care about democracy, sure you do
Sure. And if the presidential election were based on actual voting, Clinton would be president.
Okay. How was it rigged? Explain it to me.Debbie had to step down, they rigged the nomination, everyone knows itHacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.
Making Dem wrongdoing public must have really hurt Hillary.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
There was no wrongdoing exposed.
Emails that exposed no wrongdoing were released by the Russians and cost Hillary the election?
Not sure if it "cost" her election, but it certainly helped. We could release Trump's financials, it might not show any wrongdoing but it would be damaging.
Not sure if it "cost" her election, but it certainly helped.
Why would emails, with nothing bad in them, harm Clinton?
"Bad" and "wrongdoing" are different concepts, and you've used them interchangeably.
As I said, it's not that there was anything wrong, but that they could be portrayed as such. As other posters have said, people have the impression that those emails demonstrated the DNC rigged the election, which is not true.
Alright, let's roll it back. Trump is an idiot. He lies. He's a fraud. He's a troll. That's not being a better candidate. That's tapping into rage and hatred or the stupidity of the electorate.Aw, did I hurt your feewings?Yeah, if you want to know what someone is really like, as someone who hates their ever loving guts. You'll get the unbiased truth that way
That doesn't even make sense. This is several posts in a row from you that don't even make logical sense in the discussion. I guess that's what butt hurt does to you
Our country used the react against that impulse, but now it's been legitimized, embraced.
Was Clinton a bad candidate? Sure. Was she a troll? No.
Wrong the EC reflects the votersThe EC doesn't reflect the voters. It reflects the votes transformed by an arbitrary system of electoral votes.It was actual voting, that's how my country works, Trump won the ECIt wasn't rigged. That's the power of the email hack. It's not what they said, it's what people could make others believe they said.So we didn't have a right to know the DNC and Hillary rigged the nomination?Hacking the DNC and Podesta and disseminating their private emails to the public.And yes, Trump is a Traitor....for taking help from the Russians, in order to win the 2016 election....
What was that Russian help again?
Like getting people to believe the nomination was rigged.
Of course the nomination was rigged. Bernie would have been in it up until nearly the end if it were based on actual voting. But the party elites had already clinched it for Hillary. Yeah, Democrats care about democracy, sure you do
Sure. And if the presidential election were based on actual voting, Clinton would be president.
Kinda like delegates...
Why wouldn't I? Trolling is intended to make people mad.Alright, let's roll it back. Trump is an idiot. He lies. He's a fraud. He's a troll. That's not being a better candidate. That's tapping into rage and hatred or the stupidity of the electorate.Aw, did I hurt your feewings?Yeah, if you want to know what someone is really like, as someone who hates their ever loving guts. You'll get the unbiased truth that way
That doesn't even make sense. This is several posts in a row from you that don't even make logical sense in the discussion. I guess that's what butt hurt does to you
Our country used the react against that impulse, but now it's been legitimized, embraced.
Was Clinton a bad candidate? Sure. Was she a troll? No.
Well there we have it, your mad because Trump trolls the fuck out of you.
Lol
