The NRA Said "The Only Way To Stop A Bad Guy With A Gun,..

[JoeB131]

is a good guy with a gun"

Except for the rare circumstances in which the shooter kills himself, yes, that's how a bad guy with a gun is stopped. How do you propose we stop a bad guy with a gun...hit him over the head with a 'gun free zone' sign?

?

How about not letting him have a gun to start with.

This guy was involved in TWO previous instances where he discharged a gun illegally.

He was seeing a shrink about voices in his head.

How the hell was THIS guy able to get a gun or still have a gun?

 

[bripat9643]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

How do you know that? The New York Times is still saying he had an AR-15. If they can't get that right, then how can we believe anything the press says about the incident?

 

[Derideo_Te]

never let a tragedy or dancing on the graves of the dead go to waste, for their hate agenda ON the NRA...

are these the most pathetic shameless people ever?

This tragedy could have been prevented.

Yes, it could have.

This man should have never been allowed to have security clearance to the facility due to his past issues that were known to the military.

Given what they already knew about him that would have been a sensible precaution to take. Be interesting to discover why it wasn't.

 

[hjmick]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

Apparently you are unfamiliar with a concept known as "the element of surprise..."

 

[JoeB131]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

Apparently you are unfamiliar with a concept known as "the element of surprise..."

But that's the problem. The bad guy is ALWAYS going to have the element of surprise.

It's why we have 11,101 gun murders and only 200 self-defense homicides.

 

[Edgetho]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

That can't be right. The shipyard was a gun free zone, as is all of the District of Columbia. A Gun Free Zone. They have signs and everything!

 

[martybegan]

There were armed guards, which he obtained the pistol from. Nice job lying again,..

Armed guards and armed policemen are allowed in all 'gun free zones', but everyone knows that. A 'gun free zone' means that non-law enforcement citizens are not allowed to defend themselves with a firearm, even if they have a permit. Military bases are gun free zones because only MPs and other official guards are allowed to be armed. Regular soldiers and civilian contracts are expected to cower in the corner and wait to be saved by a good guy with a gun.

Again, are you dumb, lying, or just being obtuse for the hell of it?

Read the OP shithead, Alexis was able to take down armed guards to obtain their arms to kill more people.

Why would those "good guys with guns" lose their guns that later were used to kill more people?

Because he got the drop on them you fucking dolt. Having a gun doesnt mean you automatically win in a gun fight, it means you at least have a chance against someone with another gun.

And once they were down, everyone else was easy pickings. He went for the people he KNEW had guns, neutralized them, and the proceeded on his rampage.

A person with a CCW inside would possibly have had the drop on Alexis, as he couldnt know who was armed and who wasnt.

 

[martybegan]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

Apparently you are unfamiliar with a concept known as "the element of surprise..."

But that's the problem. The bad guy is ALWAYS going to have the element of surprise.

It's why we have 11,101 gun murders and only 200 self-defense homicides.

Still not a reason to deny me the right to own a firearm. Keep trying Joebutthurt.

 

[Edgetho]

9 Potential Mass Shootings That Were Stopped By Someone With A Personally-Owned Firearm

9 Potential Mass Shootings That Were Stopped By Someone With A Personally-Owned Firearm

1. The Pearl High School shooting

Oct. 1, 1997
Luke Woodham fatally stabbed and bludgeoned his mother and went on to kill two students and injure seven others at his high school. Woodham was stopped by Assistant Principal Joel Myrick, a U.S. Army Reserve commander, who detained Woodham by using a .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol he kept in his truck, until authorities could show up.

Myrick stopped Woodham from going across the street to the middle school.

Edge:
There's eight more at the link.... Obviously

Here's the deal, my fellow Patriotic Americans..... dimocraps don't want 'sensible' gun control.

dimocraps don't even want 'gun control' at all.

What they want is gun confiscation. All of them. Every last one.

dimocraps want you unarmed and unable to defend yourselves because, as long you're armed, you're a threat to what they want to do to our Country.

Disbelieve me at your own risk.

I shit you not

 

[Lonestar_logic]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

How was the bad guy stopped?


Hint:

It wasn't sunshine and lollipops.

 

[Pete7469]

never let a tragedy or dancing on the graves of the dead go to waste, for their hate agenda ON the NRA...

are these the most pathetic shameless people ever?

It takes the "Black Hole of Liberal Ignorance" for someone to be able to block out the simple logic that a bad guy with a gun is most effectively stopped by the closest good guy with a gun.

It takes a special kind of vapid parasite to demand the good guys are disarmed, because that's what they're programmed to regurgitate.

 

[martybegan]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

He passed your prescious government background check.

He was in a gun free zone, patrolled by armed security guards.

He voted for Obama.

And yet you're attacking "gun nutters".

It must really suck to be a liberal these days.

Don't forget he used a Joe Biden approved firearm for all of this.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

never let a tragedy or dancing on the graves of the dead go to waste, for their hate agenda ON the NRA...

are these the most pathetic shameless people ever?

This tragedy could have been prevented.

True. With all the warning signs with this guy, he should have never been allowed the clearance to work in the naval shipyard.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Apparently you are unfamiliar with a concept known as "the element of surprise..."

But that's the problem. The bad guy is ALWAYS going to have the element of surprise.

It's why we have 11,101 gun murders and only 200 self-defense homicides.

Still not a reason to deny me the right to own a firearm. Keep trying Joebutthurt.

No one wants to deny you the right to own a firearm. What We the People need to do instead is make sure that whackjobs like Alexis don't have access to guns.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

But that's the problem. The bad guy is ALWAYS going to have the element of surprise.

It's why we have 11,101 gun murders and only 200 self-defense homicides.

Still not a reason to deny me the right to own a firearm. Keep trying Joebutthurt.

No one wants to deny you the right to own a firearm. What We the People need to do instead is make sure that whackjobs like Alexis don't have access to guns.

Then we need to revise the HIPAA laws.

 

[martybegan]

But that's the problem. The bad guy is ALWAYS going to have the element of surprise.

It's why we have 11,101 gun murders and only 200 self-defense homicides.

Still not a reason to deny me the right to own a firearm. Keep trying Joebutthurt.

No one wants to deny you the right to own a firearm. What We the People need to do instead is make sure that whackjobs like Alexis don't have access to guns.

If you read JoeB's posts he actually DOES want to deny any non governmental agent from owning a firearm.

And considering most gun grabber legislation is directed at law abiding gun owners, I dont beleive your statement.

 

[Pete7469]

Here's the deal, my fellow Patriotic Americans..... dimocraps don't want 'sensible' gun control.

dimocraps don't even want 'gun control' at all.

What they want is gun confiscation. All of them. Every last one.

dimocraps want you unarmed and unable to defend yourselves because, as long you're armed, you're a threat to what they want to do to our Country.

Disbelieve me at your own risk.

I shit you not

Spot on.

There's no way they can "manage the human resource" if the cattle can resist being culled from time to time.

Thus proving something that cannot be said often enough.

In order to be a liberal you have to be a complete blithering idiot, or a criminally insane authortarian sociopath.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

But that's the problem. The bad guy is ALWAYS going to have the element of surprise.

It's why we have 11,101 gun murders and only 200 self-defense homicides.

Still not a reason to deny me the right to own a firearm. Keep trying Joebutthurt.

No one wants to deny you the right to own a firearm. What We the People need to do instead is make sure that whackjobs like Alexis don't have access to guns.

"No One" ? Huh ? Actually much of the left would ban guns outright if they could.

 

[Derideo_Te]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

Apparently you are unfamiliar with a concept known as "the element of surprise..."

True, but technically the guys with the guns are not supposed to allow anyone to surprise them because that is what they are paid to do and why they are given guns in the first place.

That doesn't mean that it can't happen but it should never have been possible for a single person to get the drop on all of them.

 

[martybegan]

is a good guy with a gun"

It turns out Alexis was armed only with a shotgun. He was able to take down those "good guys with guns" in the building to then use their handguns to kill more people.

What will LaPierre and the gun-nutters say now?

Apparently you are unfamiliar with a concept known as "the element of surprise..."

True, but technically the guys with the guns are not supposed to allow anyone to surprise them because that is what they are paid to do and why they are given guns in the first place.

That doesn't mean that it can't happen but it should never have been possible for a single person to get the drop on all of them.

Most pilots are supposed to be able to land an airplane, sometimes they dont. The problem with security at these places is it becomes pro forma, just another thing you have to do every day, day in, day out. The concept of an actual threat occuring becomes a distant thought. The guard sees his job as basically checking ID's and searching the occasional bag, and looses focus on the fact that someone might actually pull a gun out and do something bad.