Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RD has been contributing to this thread for quite awhile.
This is whacko bullshit
Whacko? You want whacko?
Here's WHACKO!!!!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdjY6oy4Y2c]Darth Vader and the Imperial March on Bagpipes and Unicycle - The Unipiper - YouTube[/ame]
Sorry, just trying to lighten the mood.
RD has been contributing to this thread for quite awhile.
This is whacko bullshit
Dee Dee testified that TM was "by" it, not "near it" or even "near by" it. The testimony was given in conjunction with her explanation of why TM chose to confront GZ instead of running home. Paraphrasing from memory:
"Because he was already by it sir"
In the context of the testimony the natural meaning of this statement was that TM was immediately adjacent to the condo and that is why he could not or did not run home.
But she didnt know how near it he was...she said she thought a couple of houses down. I would contend that "near or by" is subjective because near in relation to where he came "from" could mean a couple of doors down or at the other side of the building. You can never tell for sure with DD...she even said she was having trouble hearing him.
You want to use this testimony to support the defense narrative...yet you want to throw out what she says just after it, which is in total contradiction of what GZ says was said and happened...me? I dont believe any of her testimony or give any credence to it...she was trying to defend why she failed to take the incident serious and had a separate motive, imo....you are picking and choosing.
I agree she got it wrong, that does not change the context. We can easily assert that Dee Dee did not get it right without calling her a liar.
Clearly and according to Dee Dee, he did not run to the condo because he was already "by" it. Whether you wish to say a couple of doors down or whatever, Dee Dee was under the impression that the confrontation with GZ occurred so close to the condo as to make running to the condo superfluous. That was the sole reason she said he was "by" it.
George Zimmerman Probably Won't Be Convicted of Murder or Manslaughter -- Here's Why - ABC News
Great Top Comment too:
Zimmerman told his side of the story three times within twelve hours of the event, and there were no significant differences. He did this WITHOUT a lawyer. To me, the actions of man who does not think he did anything wrong.
The prosecution was a witch hunt pushed by the usual race baiters. A repeat of the Duke lacrosse team, and the Tawanna Bradley story.
Right there it states he is a white male. Did the media make that up?
it does not matter what it states. media posted his photo - and he clearly is NOT white.
so they invented a moronic term "white hispanic" instead
Geez, I can't believe there is still an argument over the fact that Zimmerman was listed as "white".
Hispanics are considered caucasians, and caucasians are "white" - so he is white.
Hispanic is an ethnicity, not a race, so he is Hispanic White.
And Obama is Black/White so he could list himself as either, but chooses black, looks more black than white, but he would not be wrong if he called himself "white".
On the US Census, there is no 1/2 white 1/2 black.
I am going to assume that you misspoke here knowing how you have posted in the past, because suggesting that the confrontation is by the condo goes completely against the defense theory....which is why I say that her statement just as easily proves one as it does the other...so I dismiss it. The altercation happens after she says by it or near it, whatever. So if that is taken literally, then that would put the GZ at the other end of the path nearer to Trays condo...that is why putting both together makes it impossible. That was key to me.
Dee Dee testified that TM was "by" it, not "near it" or even "near by" it. The testimony was given in conjunction with her explanation of why TM chose to confront GZ instead of running home. Paraphrasing from memory:
"Because he was already by it sir"
In the context of the testimony the natural meaning of this statement was that TM was immediately adjacent to the condo and that is why he could not or did not run home.
But she didnt know how near it he was...she said she thought a couple of houses down. I would contend that "near or by" is subjective because near in relation to where he came "from" could mean a couple of doors down or at the other side of the building. You can never tell for sure with DD...she even said she was having trouble hearing him.
You want to use this testimony to support the defense narrative...yet you want to throw out what she says just after it, which is in total contradiction of what GZ says was said and happened...me? I dont believe any of her testimony or give any credence to it...she was trying to defend why she failed to take the incident serious and had a separate motive, imo....you are picking and choosing.
I agree she got it wrong, that does not change the context. We can easily assert that Dee Dee did not get it right without calling her a liar.
Clearly and according to Dee Dee, he did not run to the condo because he was already "by" it. Whether you wish to say a couple of doors down or whatever, Dee Dee was under the impression that the confrontation with GZ occurred so close to the condo as to make running to the condo superfluous. That was the sole reason she said he was "by" it.
George Zimmerman Probably Won't Be Convicted of Murder or Manslaughter -- Here's Why - ABC News
Great Top Comment too:
Zimmerman told his side of the story three times within twelve hours of the event, and there were no significant differences. He did this WITHOUT a lawyer. To me, the actions of man who does not think he did anything wrong.
The prosecution was a witch hunt pushed by the usual race baiters. A repeat of the Duke lacrosse team, and the Tawanna Bradley story.
...has forced it so that now conservatives say they are pro-Zimmerman, liberals say they are pro-Martin...
No, Juan tries though. For those "pro-Zimmerman" it comes down to facts not politics. The same cannot be said about the others. That they are the left as a rule speaks to another issue altogether
RD has been contributing to this thread for quite awhile.
This is whacko bullshit
Pile-ons are whacko...and you contribute to it frequently. All of the hateful comments and trolling are dismissed as long as you support GZ but let someone come in and respond and the pileons begin...adults? No way. You have to weed thru the bs just to talk trial...then they follow to other threads. But you have no problem with that...you just dont like them called out. pfft.
We all know how you respond test, if you are trolled, we got a nice taste of that when you first signed up here. So save the lectures, miss.
