The only way to stop carbon emissions

[Votto]

Is to let North Korea, or people like them, take over the world.

Here is North Korea at night.

 

[Moonglow]

They can light their farts as they walk...

 

[Misty]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

 

[Votto]

Actually, I think the North Koreans know that their dictator, or people like him, is the only hope for humanity because North Korea helps curb carbon emissions. Just look at how they cry over the death of their last dictator.

Next thing you know, after their collectivist dictator dies people will be getting high paying capitalistic jobs and then buying SUV's and large houses to warm and cool without his supervision. I almost start to cry just thinking about it.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j24nO2iNli8]North Koreans Cry Overwhelmingly over death of Kim Jong-il - YouTube[/ame]

Wow, didn't they know that Kim Jon was.....um.......il?

 

[KNB]

This is a better idea:

This will supply transportation fuel and electricity while simultaneously taking in CO2 from the atmosphere, and replacing trees for paper so that forests stay in the ground to take in more CO2.

 

[Votto]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

Oh dear, a climate changer denier.

You make Al Gore and the North Koreans cry.

 

[Votto]

They can light their farts as they walk...

It only works if you walk backwards.

Are you a progressive? If so, you already know how to do this.

 

[Votto]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

The answer is obvious I think. Start forcing Mother Nature to pay a higher carbon tax. That should put an end to it.

 

[Avorysuds]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

Oh dear, a climate changer denier.

You make Al Gore and the North Koreans cry.

Nature = 97% of all admissions. Man = 3%... America = .3%

Why do you hate science? Because it proves man has no control over the weather?

 

[Moonglow]

They can light their farts as they walk...

It only works if you walk backwards.

Are you a progressive? If so, you already know how to do this.

I learned how before I ever knew about politics...

 

[Votto]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

Oh dear, a climate changer denier.

You make Al Gore and the North Koreans cry.

Nature = 97% of all admissions. Man = 3%... America = .3%

Why do you hate science? Because it proves man has no control over the weather?

You are just confusing the issue with facts.

Stop it or I'll send the EPA to your house.

 

[konradv]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

Man emits more CO2 in DAYS than all the volcanoes on earth do in a normal year. That being said we're talking the amount over and above natural emissions as being the problem. The ability of CO2 to absorb IR radiation is well-established. What happens if the increase seen since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, continues unabated. It's simple logic. If a little CO2 raises temps a little, a lot will raise it much more.

 

[Votto]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

Man emits more CO2 in DAYS than all the volcanoes on earth do in a normal year. That being said we're talking the amount over and above natural emissions as being the problem. The ability of CO2 to absorb IR radiation is well-established. What happens if the increase seen since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, continues unabated. It's simple logic. If a little CO2 raises temps a little, a lot will raise it much more.

Would you say then that backward impoverished countries like North Korea is good for the global warming problem?

After all, libtards keep saying that we use too much gas, heat and cool homes that are too big, go on long airplane rides that equal driving an SUV for an entire year etc. It seems to me the best way to control the problem is simply to take away all their toys and money. In other words, we need to destroy the global economies and return to our caves.

 

[Mac1958]

.

It's been over 30 years since I lived in the dorms at San Jose State, but I still vividly remember Paul, a guy who could get at least ten inches of flame when he lighted a fart. It was absolutely amazing, and he was certainly an iconic figure on the 10th floor.

He couldn't do it on demand, of course, a certain amount of beer consumption was required for both gas buildup and, uh, social lubrication.

Helluva guy, too.

.

 

[FJO]

The most notorious deniers, who defied "settled and undeniable science" were Copernicus and Galileo.

What a couple of utter fools!

 

[Old Rocks]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

OK, that is what you say. What do the scientists who study such thing say? Or are you a scientist?

Volcanic Gases and Climate Change Overview

Do the Earth’s volcanoes emit more CO2 than human activities? Research findings indicate that the answer to this frequently asked question is a clear and unequivocal, “No.” Human activities, responsible for a projected 35 billion metric tons (gigatons) of CO2 emissions in 2010 (Friedlingstein et al., 2010), release an amount of CO2 that dwarfs the annual CO2 emissions of all the world’s degassing subaerial and submarine volcanoes (Gerlach, 2011).

The published estimates of the global CO2 emission rate for all degassing subaerial (on land) and submarine volcanoes lie in a range from 0.13 gigaton to 0.44 gigaton per year (Gerlach, 1991; Varekamp et al., 1992; Allard, 1992; Sano and Williams, 1996; Marty and Tolstikhin, 1998). The preferred global estimates of the authors of these studies range from about 0.15 to 0.26 gigaton per year. The 35-gigaton projected anthropogenic CO2 emission for 2010 is about 80 to 270 times larger than the respective maximum and minimum annual global volcanic CO2 emission estimates. It is 135 times larger than the highest preferred global volcanic CO2 estimate of 0.26 gigaton per year (Marty and Tolstikhin, 1998).

 

[skookerasbil]

Nobody cares about climate change.


CNN Boss Zucker: 'Tremendous' Lack of Interest in Our Climate Change Stories

 

[Old Rocks]

The most notorious deniers, who defied "settled and undeniable science" were Copernicus and Galileo.

What a couple of utter fools!

You dumb fuck. Copernicus and Galileo defied the church. Essentially, at that time, they were the 'Science'.

You willfully ignorant denialists blissfully ignore the fact that every single Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University have policy statemenst that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

 

[konradv]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

Man emits more CO2 in DAYS than all the volcanoes on earth do in a normal year. That being said we're talking the amount over and above natural emissions as being the problem. The ability of CO2 to absorb IR radiation is well-established. What happens if the increase seen since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, continues unabated. It's simple logic. If a little CO2 raises temps a little, a lot will raise it much more.

Would you say then that backward impoverished countries like North Korea is good for the global warming problem?

After all, libtards keep saying that we use too much gas, heat and cool homes that are too big, go on long airplane rides that equal driving an SUV for an entire year etc. It seems to me the best way to control the problem is simply to take away all their toys and money. In other words, we need to destroy the global economies and return to our caves.

Reductio ad Absurdum:

Reductio ad absurdum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Check it out and perhaps you won't make the mistake of posting foolish arguments in the future.

 

[Wildman]

The major sources of carbon emissions can be found in nature itself, rocks plants, the ocean and the biggest source is volcanic eruption. not man.

Man emits more CO2 in DAYS than all the volcanoes on earth do in a normal year.
That being said we're talking the amount over and above natural emissions as being the problem. The ability of CO2 to absorb IR radiation is well-established. What happens if the increase seen since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, continues unabated. It's simple logic. If a little CO2 raises temps a little, a lot will raise it much more.

"...in DAYS" ? how many days, a thousand, a million or a trillion ? ? ?

i must congratulate you on obtaining your degree in idiocy