Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Less freedom?
Please explain how a 'Right To Work' is LESS freedom than being FORCED into a union or not being able to work at all.
Not required, but they should be allowed if they wish to.
You seem to be supporting unionized slavery, though. Do you?This is not about the right to work, they already had that.
That's completely ridiculous, could you imagine an employer paying all of your bills for you? Your 'logic' leaves a lot to be desired.
You seem to be supporting unionized slavery, though. Do you?
Not at all, I think people should have the right to join one or not join one.
Government employees make more money than the private sector and have much better benefits and perks than the private sector. I personally know several federal employees who retired in their late 50's with a 'bridge to retirement' where they're paid their social security equivalent far earlier than anyone in the private sector. All at tax payer expense. If you're a government employee, you have it made. And you sit here whining that they're somehow short changed.
Well, at least that's nice.
Now that I have answered your questions, can you tell me why it is the Govt's job to be involved in how people pay their bills?
How can the IRS tell Americans they can not pay their bill in pennies?
It's not the govt's job to tell people how to pay their bills...right?
I don't get your line of reasoning here. All they're saying is that the employer (government) won't be the intermediary in paying union dues.Now that I have answered your questions, can you tell me why it is the Govt's job to be involved in how people pay their bills?
I don't get your line of reasoning here. All they're saying is that the employer (government) won't be the intermediary in paying union dues.
Oh, I totally agree. It's fucked up political retaliation. We really need the Court to step up and do its job.The Govt is telling them they cannot pay their bill via an allotment. And it is only the Teachers union they did this to, not the Police Union or the Firefighters union.
I do not think it is the place of the Govt to do so
Oh, I totally agree. It's fucked up political retaliation. We really need the Court to step up and do its job.
If the employer is willing, why should the Govt stop them?
When I was in the Marines a lot of people paid their rent or mortgage via an allotment.
None of that has anything to do with the Govt being involved in how you pay your bills.
Your question is a misnomer to begin with since the example you're basing this on has nothing to do with the government telling anyone how they can pay their bills.Now that I have answered your questions, can you tell me why it is the Govt's job to be involved in how people pay their bills?
You're the one that said government employees were being shafted somehow, so you brought it up. And you can't refute what I said, it's 100% true, you're far better off being a government employee than a private sector employee.
Funny how you don't make threads attacking the left.
Florida teacher's union sues DeSantis over a new law that forces teachers to pay union dues through mail-in checks
Florida's largest teacher's union accused the governor of targeting "disfavored unions" because the rules don't apply to firefighters and police.www.yahoo.com
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida signed a bill into law Tuesday that will require teachers who want to be in unions to mail in written checks every month.
Now the Repubs are dictating by law how people pay their bills.
Can someone explain how this is a Conservative thing to do?
Your question is a misnomer to begin with since the example you're basing this on has nothing to do with the government telling anyone how they can pay their bills.
