esalla
Platinum Member
- Apr 13, 2020
- 8,006
- 4,265
Well there were more rain forest sequestering CO2
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Progs will DENY SCIENCE when it comes to record snowfalls, that havent happened like this over 100 years.
- Thread starter Mikeoxenormous
- Start date
ReinyDays
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2019
- 14,709
- 7,042
The question is why are you arguing with the obvious?
Relationship between Earth’s Magnetic Field and Ocean Currents?
A paper in “New Journal of Physics” titled “Secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field: induced by the ocean flow?” (available at ) suggests: Abstract. Secular variatio…cyclesresearchinstitute.wordpress.com
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio | Ocean Tides and Magnetic Fields
Seawater is an electrical conductor, and therefore interacts with the magnetic field. As the tides cycle around the ocean basins, the ocean water essentially tries to pull the geomagnetic field lines along.Because the salty water is a good, but not great, conductor, the interaction is...svs.gsfc.nasa.gov
Magnetic Field Effects On Ocean Currents
Transcript: The most widely disseminated possible consequence of Global Warming is a shift in the course of the Gulf Stream that triggers an Ice Age that sweeps suddenly across the Northern ...www.dailykos.com
Are you one of those government drones that only believes what the zombie orders you to believe
Your first two citations are effectively the same, the first cites the second ... and your third citation is commercial ...
Of the scientific references, neither support your claim ocean currents will reverse with a reversing magnetic field ... indeed they both specfically state they're only looking at the scalar value associated with the magnetic field ... and in part how Neptune effects this ... something astrologers have been claiming for thousands of years ... interesting and does "suggest" some interaction ... but until they finish their calculations, we won't know how much ...
The wind in the primary driver of ocean current like the Gulf Stream ... I'm sure stronger magnetic fields provide a braking action on the currents, one of many frictional forces at play in these types of systems ... but with the magnitude of magnetism dropping, the friction it causes will also be reduced ... thus having less effect on currents ...
The Gulf Stream flows in the direction is does due to cyclonic motion ... reversing the flow would require the Earth to spin the other way on her axis ... CO2 in the atmosphere won't do that ... obviously ...
esalla
Platinum Member
- Apr 13, 2020
- 8,006
- 4,265
You are living in some alternate fake world. You might need some real sunllightThe question is why are you arguing with the obvious?
Relationship between Earth’s Magnetic Field and Ocean Currents?
A paper in “New Journal of Physics” titled “Secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field: induced by the ocean flow?” (available at ) suggests: Abstract. Secular variatio…
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio | Ocean Tides and Magnetic Fields
Seawater is an electrical conductor, and therefore interacts with the magnetic field. As the tides cycle around the ocean basins, the ocean water essentially tries to pull the geomagnetic field lines along.Because the salty water is a good, but not great, conductor, the interaction is...
Magnetic Field Effects On Ocean Currents
Transcript: The most widely disseminated possible consequence of Global Warming is a shift in the course of the Gulf Stream that triggers an Ice Age that sweeps suddenly across the Northern ...www.dailykos.com
Are you one of those government drones that only believes what the zombie orders you to believe
Your first two citations are effectively the same, the first cites the second ... and your third citation is commercial ...
Of the scientific references, neither support your claim ocean currents will reverse with a reversing magnetic field ... indeed they both specfically state they're only looking at the scalar value associated with the magnetic field ... and in part how Neptune effects this ... something astrologers have been claiming for thousands of years ... interesting and does "suggest" some interaction ... but until they finish their calculations, we won't know how much ...
The wind in the primary driver of ocean current like the Gulf Stream ... I'm sure stronger magnetic fields provide a braking action on the currents, one of many frictional forces at play in these types of systems ... but with the magnitude of magnetism dropping, the friction it causes will also be reduced ... thus having less effect on currents ...
The Gulf Stream flows in the direction is does due to cyclonic motion ... reversing the flow would require the Earth to spin the other way on her axis ... CO2 in the atmosphere won't do that ... obviously ...
Ice age polarity reversal was global event: Extremely brief reversal of geomagnetic field, climate variability, and super volcano
Some 41,000 years ago, a complete and rapid reversal of the geomagnetic field occured. Magnetic studies on sediment cores from the Black Sea show that during this period, during the last ice age, a compass at the Black Sea would have pointed to the south instead of north. Moreover, data obtained...
www.sciencedaily.com
The magnetic history of ice
The history of our planet has been written, among other things, in the periodic reversal of its magnetic poles. Scientists at the Weizmann Institute of Science propose a new means of reading this historic record: in ice. Their findings, which were recently reported in Earth and Planetary Science...
This idea shows an even closer relationship
Ocean currents may control Earth’s magnetic field
Ocean currents may control Earth's magnetic field
www.tgdaily.com
I could prove you wrong all day, but you would still be living in denial.
PS. I'll be wrong one day, you will not be involved. Shit my life would be way easier if I could make an appreciable mistake, and besides the FBI would be happier as well.
he he he
ReinyDays
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2019
- 14,709
- 7,042
You are living in some alternate fake world. You might need some real sunllightThe question is why are you arguing with the obvious?
Relationship between Earth’s Magnetic Field and Ocean Currents?
A paper in “New Journal of Physics” titled “Secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field: induced by the ocean flow?” (available at ) suggests: Abstract. Secular variatio…
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio | Ocean Tides and Magnetic Fields
Seawater is an electrical conductor, and therefore interacts with the magnetic field. As the tides cycle around the ocean basins, the ocean water essentially tries to pull the geomagnetic field lines along.Because the salty water is a good, but not great, conductor, the interaction is...
Magnetic Field Effects On Ocean Currents
Transcript: The most widely disseminated possible consequence of Global Warming is a shift in the course of the Gulf Stream that triggers an Ice Age that sweeps suddenly across the Northern ...www.dailykos.com
Are you one of those government drones that only believes what the zombie orders you to believe
Your first two citations are effectively the same, the first cites the second ... and your third citation is commercial ...
Of the scientific references, neither support your claim ocean currents will reverse with a reversing magnetic field ... indeed they both specfically state they're only looking at the scalar value associated with the magnetic field ... and in part how Neptune effects this ... something astrologers have been claiming for thousands of years ... interesting and does "suggest" some interaction ... but until they finish their calculations, we won't know how much ...
The wind in the primary driver of ocean current like the Gulf Stream ... I'm sure stronger magnetic fields provide a braking action on the currents, one of many frictional forces at play in these types of systems ... but with the magnitude of magnetism dropping, the friction it causes will also be reduced ... thus having less effect on currents ...
The Gulf Stream flows in the direction is does due to cyclonic motion ... reversing the flow would require the Earth to spin the other way on her axis ... CO2 in the atmosphere won't do that ... obviously ...
Ice age polarity reversal was global event: Extremely brief reversal of geomagnetic field, climate variability, and super volcano
Some 41,000 years ago, a complete and rapid reversal of the geomagnetic field occured. Magnetic studies on sediment cores from the Black Sea show that during this period, during the last ice age, a compass at the Black Sea would have pointed to the south instead of north. Moreover, data obtained...www.sciencedaily.com
The magnetic history of ice
The history of our planet has been written, among other things, in the periodic reversal of its magnetic poles. Scientists at the Weizmann Institute of Science propose a new means of reading this historic record: in ice. Their findings, which were recently reported in Earth and Planetary Science...phys.org
This idea shows an even closer relationship
Ocean currents may control Earth’s magnetic field
Ocean currents may control Earth's magnetic field
I could prove you wrong all day, but you would still be living in denial.
PS. I'll be wrong one day, you will not be involved. Shit my life would be way easier if I could make an appreciable mistake, and besides the FBI would be happier as well.
he he he
If the title of your citation uses the word "may" ... you haven't proved anything ... you don't know what a scalar is ... why do you pretend you do? ...
esalla
Platinum Member
- Apr 13, 2020
- 8,006
- 4,265
And you are denying all Earth science at this point. I wonder what is your motive for thatYou are living in some alternate fake world. You might need some real sunllightThe question is why are you arguing with the obvious?
Relationship between Earth’s Magnetic Field and Ocean Currents?
A paper in “New Journal of Physics” titled “Secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field: induced by the ocean flow?” (available at ) suggests: Abstract. Secular variatio…
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio | Ocean Tides and Magnetic Fields
Seawater is an electrical conductor, and therefore interacts with the magnetic field. As the tides cycle around the ocean basins, the ocean water essentially tries to pull the geomagnetic field lines along.Because the salty water is a good, but not great, conductor, the interaction is...
Magnetic Field Effects On Ocean Currents
Transcript: The most widely disseminated possible consequence of Global Warming is a shift in the course of the Gulf Stream that triggers an Ice Age that sweeps suddenly across the Northern ...www.dailykos.com
Are you one of those government drones that only believes what the zombie orders you to believe
Your first two citations are effectively the same, the first cites the second ... and your third citation is commercial ...
Of the scientific references, neither support your claim ocean currents will reverse with a reversing magnetic field ... indeed they both specfically state they're only looking at the scalar value associated with the magnetic field ... and in part how Neptune effects this ... something astrologers have been claiming for thousands of years ... interesting and does "suggest" some interaction ... but until they finish their calculations, we won't know how much ...
The wind in the primary driver of ocean current like the Gulf Stream ... I'm sure stronger magnetic fields provide a braking action on the currents, one of many frictional forces at play in these types of systems ... but with the magnitude of magnetism dropping, the friction it causes will also be reduced ... thus having less effect on currents ...
The Gulf Stream flows in the direction is does due to cyclonic motion ... reversing the flow would require the Earth to spin the other way on her axis ... CO2 in the atmosphere won't do that ... obviously ...
Ice age polarity reversal was global event: Extremely brief reversal of geomagnetic field, climate variability, and super volcano
Some 41,000 years ago, a complete and rapid reversal of the geomagnetic field occured. Magnetic studies on sediment cores from the Black Sea show that during this period, during the last ice age, a compass at the Black Sea would have pointed to the south instead of north. Moreover, data obtained...www.sciencedaily.com
The magnetic history of ice
The history of our planet has been written, among other things, in the periodic reversal of its magnetic poles. Scientists at the Weizmann Institute of Science propose a new means of reading this historic record: in ice. Their findings, which were recently reported in Earth and Planetary Science...
This idea shows an even closer relationship
Ocean currents may control Earth’s magnetic field
Ocean currents may control Earth's magnetic field
I could prove you wrong all day, but you would still be living in denial.
PS. I'll be wrong one day, you will not be involved. Shit my life would be way easier if I could make an appreciable mistake, and besides the FBI would be happier as well.
he he he
If the title of your citation uses the word "may" ... you haven't proved anything ... you don't know what a scalar is ... why do you pretend you do? ...
BREAKING NEWS: Global Warming Supporters Now Say Earth’s Magnetic Field Most Important
www.earthchangesmedia.com
Shit even Al Bore agrees at this point
Sunlight helps, as vitamin D is being reclassified as a hormone. So get those rays
ding
Confront reality
- Oct 25, 2016
- 119,808
- 21,219
You lost me there.
Just out of pure curiosity ... why do you think humans were absorbing 1,954.8 billion tons of CO2 at the time Christ was born? ...
ding
Confront reality
- Oct 25, 2016
- 119,808
- 21,219
Go away.Not at all, you are claiming that I said things that I never did. I said clearly that all emissions mix meaning that it's a world effort or none. Then in your psychosis you have me paying China.You are all over the map on this, Frannie.No I supported Trump for pulling out of the accord.So do you think it makes sense for US taxpayers to pay for other nations to become more green?We need to catch up to China and produce more CO2 so we can get Antarctica green
What planet are you on anyway?
Again you need to take all of your prescriptions
Rigby5
Diamond Member
- Apr 23, 2017
- 31,994
- 10,783
The question is why are you arguing with the obvious?
Relationship between Earth’s Magnetic Field and Ocean Currents?
A paper in “New Journal of Physics” titled “Secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field: induced by the ocean flow?” (available at ) suggests: Abstract. Secular variatio…
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio | Ocean Tides and Magnetic Fields
Seawater is an electrical conductor, and therefore interacts with the magnetic field. As the tides cycle around the ocean basins, the ocean water essentially tries to pull the geomagnetic field lines along.Because the salty water is a good, but not great, conductor, the interaction is...
Magnetic Field Effects On Ocean Currents
Transcript: The most widely disseminated possible consequence of Global Warming is a shift in the course of the Gulf Stream that triggers an Ice Age that sweeps suddenly across the Northern ...www.dailykos.com
Are you one of those government drones that only believes what the zombie orders you to believe
Your first two citations are effectively the same, the first cites the second ... and your third citation is commercial ...
Of the scientific references, neither support your claim ocean currents will reverse with a reversing magnetic field ... indeed they both specfically state they're only looking at the scalar value associated with the magnetic field ... and in part how Neptune effects this ... something astrologers have been claiming for thousands of years ... interesting and does "suggest" some interaction ... but until they finish their calculations, we won't know how much ...
The wind in the primary driver of ocean current like the Gulf Stream ... I'm sure stronger magnetic fields provide a braking action on the currents, one of many frictional forces at play in these types of systems ... but with the magnitude of magnetism dropping, the friction it causes will also be reduced ... thus having less effect on currents ...
The Gulf Stream flows in the direction is does due to cyclonic motion ... reversing the flow would require the Earth to spin the other way on her axis ... CO2 in the atmosphere won't do that ... obviously ...
I am coming into this in middle and don't have time to read the previous context, but ending the Gulf Stream warming of Europe does not require a change in currents or axis spin of the planet.
All it takes is for cold fresh water melt-off from Greenland to force the heavier warmer salt water of the Gulf stream to subduct down beneath the surface, where it is much colder.
That would prevent Gulf Stream warming of Europe, dropping temperatures there by over 10 degrees F. That is one of many ways how global warming can cause local cooling.
Another is by energying polar storms enough to leave their normal latitudes, and get much further towards the equator than they normally are able to.
Global warming means much more energetic weather, which can many more extreme results.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
- Apr 23, 2017
- 31,994
- 10,783
Global warming means more snow because there is more evaporated water vapor in the air to condense from winter weather. It is going to snow if it is 25 degrees or -25 degrees.
Temperature alone does not decide it it is going to snow.
The main factor in the winter is whether or not there is enough water vapor in the air.
And global warming greatly increases water vapor in the air.
Temperature alone does not decide it it is going to snow.
The main factor in the winter is whether or not there is enough water vapor in the air.
And global warming greatly increases water vapor in the air.
- Apr 21, 2010
- 99,103
- 60,403
Well there were more rain forest sequestering CO2
Just out of pure curiosity ... why do you think humans were absorbing 1,954.8 billion tons of CO2 at the time Christ was born? ...
The overwhelmingly vast majority of CO2 is held in the oceans.
Last edited:
- Apr 21, 2010
- 99,103
- 60,403
The question is why are you arguing with the obvious?
Relationship between Earth’s Magnetic Field and Ocean Currents?
A paper in “New Journal of Physics” titled “Secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field: induced by the ocean flow?” (available at ) suggests: Abstract. Secular variatio…
NASA Scientific Visualization Studio | Ocean Tides and Magnetic Fields
Seawater is an electrical conductor, and therefore interacts with the magnetic field. As the tides cycle around the ocean basins, the ocean water essentially tries to pull the geomagnetic field lines along.Because the salty water is a good, but not great, conductor, the interaction is...
Magnetic Field Effects On Ocean Currents
Transcript: The most widely disseminated possible consequence of Global Warming is a shift in the course of the Gulf Stream that triggers an Ice Age that sweeps suddenly across the Northern ...www.dailykos.com
Are you one of those government drones that only believes what the zombie orders you to believe
Your first two citations are effectively the same, the first cites the second ... and your third citation is commercial ...
Of the scientific references, neither support your claim ocean currents will reverse with a reversing magnetic field ... indeed they both specfically state they're only looking at the scalar value associated with the magnetic field ... and in part how Neptune effects this ... something astrologers have been claiming for thousands of years ... interesting and does "suggest" some interaction ... but until they finish their calculations, we won't know how much ...
The wind in the primary driver of ocean current like the Gulf Stream ... I'm sure stronger magnetic fields provide a braking action on the currents, one of many frictional forces at play in these types of systems ... but with the magnitude of magnetism dropping, the friction it causes will also be reduced ... thus having less effect on currents ...
The Gulf Stream flows in the direction is does due to cyclonic motion ... reversing the flow would require the Earth to spin the other way on her axis ... CO2 in the atmosphere won't do that ... obviously ...
I am coming into this in middle and don't have time to read the previous context, but ending the Gulf Stream warming of Europe does not require a change in currents or axis spin of the planet.
All it takes is for cold fresh water melt-off from Greenland to force the heavier warmer salt water of the Gulf stream to subduct down beneath the surface, where it is much colder.
That would prevent Gulf Stream warming of Europe, dropping temperatures there by over 10 degrees F. That is one of many ways how global warming can cause local cooling.
Another is by energying polar storms enough to leave their normal latitudes, and get much further towards the equator than they normally are able to.
Global warming means much more energetic weather, which can many more extreme results.
The problem with that theory is warm water rises.
- Apr 21, 2010
- 99,103
- 60,403
Global warming means more snow because there is more evaporated water vapor in the air to condense from winter weather. It is going to snow if it is 25 degrees or -25 degrees.
Temperature alone does not decide it it is going to snow.
The main factor in the winter is whether or not there is enough water vapor in the air.
And global warming greatly increases water vapor in the air.
And the problem with that theory is the residence time of water vapor in the atmosphere is 9 days.
esalla
Platinum Member
- Apr 13, 2020
- 8,006
- 4,265
Much was also released by burning of forest and with that forest cleared the reuptake process there is eliminatedWell there were more rain forest sequestering CO2
Just out of pure curiosity ... why do you think humans were absorbing 1,954.8 billion tons of CO2 at the time Christ was born? ...
The overwhelmingly vast majority of CO2 is hed in the oceans.
- Apr 21, 2010
- 99,103
- 60,403
Much was also released by burning of forest and with that forest cleared the reuptake process there is eliminatedWell there were more rain forest sequestering CO2
Just out of pure curiosity ... why do you think humans were absorbing 1,954.8 billion tons of CO2 at the time Christ was born? ...
The overwhelmingly vast majority of CO2 is hed in the oceans.
Rainforest is important for many many things. Globull warming ain't one of them.
esalla
Platinum Member
- Apr 13, 2020
- 8,006
- 4,265
Well they are a major source of Carbon lockup and Oxygen production, the more of both the betterMuch was also released by burning of forest and with that forest cleared the reuptake process there is eliminatedWell there were more rain forest sequestering CO2
Just out of pure curiosity ... why do you think humans were absorbing 1,954.8 billion tons of CO2 at the time Christ was born? ...
The overwhelmingly vast majority of CO2 is hed in the oceans.
Rainforest is important for many many things. Globull warming ain't one of them.
ReinyDays
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2019
- 14,709
- 7,042
And you are denying all Earth science at this point. I wonder what is your motive for that
You don't know what a scalar is ... why do you think you understand an article about scalars? ... [giggle] ... ah, the ad homenim attacks answers that question, my apologies ...
ReinyDays
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2019
- 14,709
- 7,042
You lost me there.
Just out of pure curiosity ... why do you think humans were absorbing 1,954.8 billion tons of CO2 at the time Christ was born? ...
The chart I quoted has a math equation inside of it ... I'm assuming that's the equation the graph is representing ... the equation is in a simple slope/intercept form ... the slope is 0.996, okay ... the y-intercept is -1,954.8 ... what that means that when x=0 (or 1 BC), y= -1,954.8 gigatonnes ... [cute adorable doe-eyed smile] ... just curious is all ...
- Apr 21, 2010
- 99,103
- 60,403
Well they are a major source of Carbon lockup and Oxygen production, the more of both the betterMuch was also released by burning of forest and with that forest cleared the reuptake process there is eliminatedWell there were more rain forest sequestering CO2
Just out of pure curiosity ... why do you think humans were absorbing 1,954.8 billion tons of CO2 at the time Christ was born? ...
The overwhelmingly vast majority of CO2 is hed in the oceans.
Rainforest is important for many many things. Globull warming ain't one of them.
Why are you so interested in keeping CO2 locked away? You don't like life?
esalla
Platinum Member
- Apr 13, 2020
- 8,006
- 4,265
Again get some sunlight, and take off that mask because your O2 is obviously limited.And you are denying all Earth science at this point. I wonder what is your motive for that
You don't know what a scalar is ... why do you think you understand an article about scalars? ... [giggle] ... ah, the ad homenim attacks answers that question, my apologies ...
LOL says the cubical clown who both does not understand the relationship between the Earths magnetic field and it's potential reversal on the fluid dynamics of both magma and seawater and the clown that denies the relationships in the first place.
Jesus Christ, peel the potatoes already
esalla
Platinum Member
- Apr 13, 2020
- 8,006
- 4,265
The rainforest sequester large amounts of CO2 and in the process convert sunlight to sugar and Oxygen that enable the food chain and allow you to breath. You have an issue with that?Well they are a major source of Carbon lockup and Oxygen production, the more of both the betterMuch was also released by burning of forest and with that forest cleared the reuptake process there is eliminatedWell there were more rain forest sequestering CO2
Just out of pure curiosity ... why do you think humans were absorbing 1,954.8 billion tons of CO2 at the time Christ was born? ...
The overwhelmingly vast majority of CO2 is hed in the oceans.
Rainforest is important for many many things. Globull warming ain't one of them.
Why are you so interested in keeping CO2 locked away? You don't like life?
You never should have skipped the first grade, as you missed a lot
Similar threads
- Replies
- 187
- Views
- 7K
- Replies
- 63
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 941
- Replies
- 35
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 31
- Views
- 3K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 34
- Views
- 111
- Replies
- 66
- Views
- 296
- Replies
- 67
- Views
- 362
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8473
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 481
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-