The Real Crime: Honesty

The Real Crime: Honesty

In a secular society such as ours, where the collective is prized over individualism, Heaven help the brave soul who speaks his mind.....if it runs counter to the 'authorized' truth.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejph4LBdmmc]WMD LIES - Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc. - THE ULTIMATE CLIP - YouTube[/ame]
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NANtvZHnT8]Bush Admits seeing first plane hit first tower - YouTube[/ame]


:cuckoo:
 
Is this thread supposed to be about

a. the victimology of 'liberal' black America, or,

b. the victimology of conservative blacks and their white allies on the right,

because no one whines more about being persecuted for their beliefs than those in line b. No one plays the victimology card better than they do...

...this thread being one more stellar example of that.

Let's be real, honesty is a "crime" that this OP will never be accused of :eusa_whistle:

Racial victimology is epidemic on the Right.

Racism has always been about protecting recessive genetic characteristics. As such, it is obvious why they feel threatened.
 
He's a black centrist which effectively puts him in the black rightwing...

...and he makes a good living doing it.



I've read his books.
Have you? Or are you still sticking to match book covers and bazooka comics?



The guy claims to be a liberal Democrat....and he is.

Yet you define him otherwise.

Who'd a guessed....




It's been a long time since a truthful post has emanated for your computer....

...maybe you should give the Geek Squad a call.
Bet they'd give you professional courtesy...you know, one Geek to another.

Gee, the other day you were conceding that there isn't one liberal socialist welfare state program that you would end, thus admitting that liberalism is the best source of social policy for this country,

and today you're admonishing us to heed the wisdom of someone you think is a liberal Democrat...

As I've said before,

Conservatism is an army in perpetual retreat.



If it weren't for lying, you'd be speechless.

Isn't that the case?

For example...

"Gee, the other day you were conceding that there isn't one liberal socialist welfare state program that you would end,..."


Document that, you sack of excrement.


Or....simple agree that my characterization of you is correct, and I never said or conceded any such thing.
 
Is this thread supposed to be about

a. the victimology of 'liberal' black America, or,

b. the victimology of conservative blacks and their white allies on the right,

because no one whines more about being persecuted for their beliefs than those in line b. No one plays the victimology card better than they do...

...this thread being one more stellar example of that.

Let's be real, honesty is a "crime" that this OP will never be accused of :eusa_whistle:

Racial victimology is epidemic on the Right.

Victimology???


The Liberal Whine....

. The American Victimization Thesis
a. During the ‘Bush Years’ taxes on the wealthy have been slashed.
b. If your parents were rich, you’ll be rich. Otherwise, no chance.
c. Government is the answer to whatever ails us.
d. Ambition, determination, grit and sweat count for nothing.
e. Neither personal responsibility nor merit are necessary.
f. Whatever your personal failures, shortcomings, and weaknesses, your troubles are caused by anyone and everyone except yourself.
g. It’s not that I don’t want to succeed, it’s that I can’t succeed.
h. The deck is always stacked against me.
i. Anyone who is poor or black or short or old or handicapped or female or gay or uncoordinated shouldn’t even try.
j. The Constitution guaranteed me ‘Life, Liberty, and Happiness!’
k. The government must make sure we are all equal in everything.
l. The government should make poor people rich and rich people poor!
m. “George Bush doesn’t care about black people.” Kanye West.
n. There must be more I can complain about!
 
The King Of BULL$HIT!!!!


alex_jones_money2-620x412.jpg

handjob.gif
.
handjob.gif
.
handjob.gif
.
handjob.gif
.
handjob.gif
 
I've read his books.
Have you? Or are you still sticking to match book covers and bazooka comics?



The guy claims to be a liberal Democrat....and he is.

Yet you define him otherwise.

Who'd a guessed....




It's been a long time since a truthful post has emanated for your computer....

...maybe you should give the Geek Squad a call.
Bet they'd give you professional courtesy...you know, one Geek to another.

Gee, the other day you were conceding that there isn't one liberal socialist welfare state program that you would end, thus admitting that liberalism is the best source of social policy for this country,

and today you're admonishing us to heed the wisdom of someone you think is a liberal Democrat...

As I've said before,

Conservatism is an army in perpetual retreat.



If it weren't for lying, you'd be speechless.

Isn't that the case?

For example...

"Gee, the other day you were conceding that there isn't one liberal socialist welfare state program that you would end,..."


Document that, you sack of excrement.


Or....simple agree that my characterization of you is correct, and I never said or conceded any such thing.

Remember when you angrily insisted you never made that statement about 'privacy',

until I showed you the post.

You still haven't admitted you lied to me about that.
 
No it wasn't.

It was an inept attempt exactly as I characterized it.

Cosby couldn't really, really be black unless he blamed white folks.

And Cosby paid a high price, didn't he.

Back in the 80s, I told that joke to a friend of mine, a Black actor who had guest starred on The Cosby Show. He thought that it was hilarious, and very true. Refer to the second part of my last post. Sorry I did not number them.


" He thought that it was hilarious,..."
You missed the eye-roll when you turned away....
...and the finger-circle next to his temple....


Your attempt to get even, 'the second part,' is just as vapid.

Don't give up the day job.

You are just upset about the thrashing you got over Kent State.
 
Referring to President Obama‘s State of the Union Address, Cosby continued, “To see people sitting down when there are others standing and cheering. I think we have people sitting there who are as bad as the people who were against any kind of desegregation. And then in place of a better America, they want their own sick feelings put across, and it’s — it isn’t — it isn’t a good time, but I think, also on our part as professors and presidents of colleges all over, and in public schools, we need to get the education of the correct history that happened so people can say, ‘Yes, this really did happen.’”

Bill Cosby Slams Republicans Who Sat Through SOTU: As Bad As Civil Rights-Era Segregationists | Mediaite

I really, really, need tougher competition.
This is like shooting fish in a barrel.



So...you believe ( I almost accused you of thinking....can you imagine???)...that that post somehow defeats the OP?????

How did you get out of elementary school??? What, did you 'age' out??


Look at the year for your post.
Almost a decade after Cosby's 'pound cake' speech, where he criticizes the culture holding blacks back!
A decade!!!

My point was that poor Cosby got beaten mercilessly for 'leaving the reservation...and I even said that he'd never do it again!
And you, bozo, show how he's trying to get back into the good graces of the Liberal mob!!!

Really....aren't you a leeetlllle ashamed of yourself??



Let's continue with my thesis:

Cosby veers from the Liberal line, and gets attacked from every corner!

'The reward Cosby gets as a reformer is an attack by such as black academic Michael Eric Dyson. He wrote "Is Bill Cosby Right?: Or Has the Black Middle Class Lost Its Mind?" in which he lambastes Cosby for "overemphasis on personal responsibility" and some sort of indifference to the "structural features" that underlie black poverty. He is offended by Cosby's insistence that young black people learn to speak and write proper English. He actually endorses 'black English," and 'Ebonics." Dyson accuses Cosby of 'disregard for the hip-hop generation,' and that Cosby has a poisonous view of the young who speak a language he can barely parse.'
Who, Cosby or Dyson, has the best interests of young blacks at heart?
Bawer, "The Victim's Revolution," p. 163-166.


a. Highly paid huckster, Dyson is also an ordained minister. In fact, he was hired by the University of Pennsylvania's Department of Religious Studies to teach the course "Great Religious Thinkers of the West." Previous scholars have focused on Augustine, Luther, Tillich, among others.
On whom did Dyson focus? Tupac Shakur.
 
Back in the 80s, I told that joke to a friend of mine, a Black actor who had guest starred on The Cosby Show. He thought that it was hilarious, and very true. Refer to the second part of my last post. Sorry I did not number them.


" He thought that it was hilarious,..."
You missed the eye-roll when you turned away....
...and the finger-circle next to his temple....


Your attempt to get even, 'the second part,' is just as vapid.

Don't give up the day job.

You are just upset about the thrashing you got over Kent State.



Where did you learn to speak English......George Orwell's "1984"???

Black is white, up is down, thrashed is victorious?????
Do you get good mileage driving in reverse?
Sort of like an inverse Einstein.



You ninny....I proved, with an audio tape, that shots were fired at the Guard.
It was my point....proven.

You, your usual 'is not, is not.'



Do you realize that blondes tell jokes about you?
 
When a black liberal sees the light, he is no longer accepted as black or a liberal. Funny how that works. I've always thought that black people shouldn't depend on the government for their needs, nor be encouraged to play the victim card.

Frederick Douglass was once asked, "What shall we (the Government) do with a Negro?"

"...Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us!"

No truer words have ever been spoken by a black man.

:clap2:
 
When a black liberal sees the light, he is no longer accepted as black or a liberal. Funny how that works. I've always thought that black people shouldn't depend on the government for their needs, nor be encouraged to play the victim card.

Frederick Douglass was once asked, "What shall we (the Government) do with a Negro?"

"...Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us!"

No truer words have ever been spoken by a black man.

While that does have some truth to it (if that quote is correct); how would the condition of Blacks have been if Government didn't pass and enforce the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments? How about the Civil rights Acts that some republicans like to claim that they "passed", that was Government doing something. How about the Government not stepping in when Blacks were being brutalized and oppressed by the Black Codes, Jim Crow, etc.?

You as a Black person would have told Government "to get out of the way" of the slave masters, KKK, and other groups of people who were systematically brutalizing, enslaving, and oppressing Black people?

There are plenty of Black Liberals who see the light and are doing quite well, they may not just agree with your particular brand of "light". If you as a conservative believe in "individualism", why would you seemingly want to attribute that "shunning" like it's a prevalent thing? I have political and social discussions with PLENTY of Black people (relatives/friends/etc.), I'm not a big Obama supporter and I have expressed my angst with some of his policies. I told them I was going to vote and voted for Gary Johnson, no one gave me any problems or attitudes, no one called me an "uncle Tom" or "sellout".

There are self described Black people on this forum who do agree with Obama and are democrats, none of them have ever given me an attitude or an insult and this is a forum where insults often fly. For someone who seemingly shuns "the victim card", it sure seems like some "Black conservatives" love to ply that card when they complain about "the Blacks" allegedly calling them Uncle Toms for no reason other than they are Black and conservative. :)
 
Remember when Clarence Thomas played the race card at his confirmation hearing? Anyone old enough to remember that?

He starting whining about the confirmation being a 'high tech lynching'...

...naw, no racial victimology there, eh? lolol

He was a pioneer. He was a conservative victimologist before conservative victimology was cool!
 
When a black liberal sees the light, he is no longer accepted as black or a liberal. Funny how that works. I've always thought that black people shouldn't depend on the government for their needs, nor be encouraged to play the victim card.

Frederick Douglass was once asked, "What shall we (the Government) do with a Negro?"

"...Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us!"

No truer words have ever been spoken by a black man.

While that does have some truth to it (if that quote is correct); how would the condition of Blacks have been if Government didn't pass and enforce the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments? How about the Civil rights Acts that some republicans like to claim that they "passed", that was Government doing something. How about the Government not stepping in when Blacks were being brutalized and oppressed by the Black Codes, Jim Crow, etc.?

You as a Black person would have told Government "to get out of the way" of the slave masters, KKK, and other groups of people who were systematically brutalizing, enslaving, and oppressing Black people?

There are plenty of Black Liberals who see the light and are doing quite well, they may not just agree with your particular brand of "light". If you as a conservative believe in "individualism", why would you seemingly want to attribute that "shunning" like it's a prevalent thing? I have political and social discussions with PLENTY of Black people (relatives/friends/etc.), I'm not a big Obama supporter and I have expressed my angst with some of his policies. I told them I was going to vote and voted for Gary Johnson, no one gave me any problems or attitudes, no one called me an "uncle Tom" or "sellout".

There are self described Black people on this forum who do agree with Obama and are democrats, none of them have ever given me an attitude or an insult and this is a forum where insults often fly. For someone who seemingly shuns "the victim card", it sure seems like some "Black conservatives" love to ply that card when they complain about "the Blacks" allegedly calling them Uncle Toms for no reason other than they are Black and conservative. :)



"While that does have some truth to it (if that quote is correct)..."

At the Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society in Boston, April, 1865, Fredrick Douglass delivered the following speech called “What the Black Man Wants.” In part:
“Everybody has asked the question, and they learned to ask it early of the abolitionists, "What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! If you see him on his way to school, let him alone, don't disturb him! If you see him going to the dinner table at a hotel, let him go! If you see him going to the ballot- box, let him alone, don't disturb him! [Applause.] If you see him going into a work-shop, just let him alone,--your interference is doing him a positive injury.”
 
[
At the Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society in Boston, April, 1865, Fredrick Douglass delivered the following speech called “What the Black Man Wants.” In part:
“Everybody has asked the question, and they learned to ask it early of the abolitionists, "What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! If you see him on his way to school, let him alone, don't disturb him! If you see him going to the dinner table at a hotel, let him go! If you see him going to the ballot- box, let him alone, don't disturb him! [Applause.] If you see him going into a work-shop, just let him alone,--your interference is doing him a positive injury.”

And white conservatives fought the black man's right to do those things every step of the way and used the government in every twisted manner they could invent to do so.
 
When a black liberal sees the light, he is no longer accepted as black or a liberal. Funny how that works. I've always thought that black people shouldn't depend on the government for their needs, nor be encouraged to play the victim card.

Frederick Douglass was once asked, "What shall we (the Government) do with a Negro?"

"...Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us!"

No truer words have ever been spoken by a black man.

While that does have some truth to it (if that quote is correct); how would the condition of Blacks have been if Government didn't pass and enforce the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments? How about the Civil rights Acts that some republicans like to claim that they "passed", that was Government doing something. How about the Government not stepping in when Blacks were being brutalized and oppressed by the Black Codes, Jim Crow, etc.?

You as a Black person would have told Government "to get out of the way" of the slave masters, KKK, and other groups of people who were systematically brutalizing, enslaving, and oppressing Black people?

There are plenty of Black Liberals who see the light and are doing quite well, they may not just agree with your particular brand of "light". If you as a conservative believe in "individualism", why would you seemingly want to attribute that "shunning" like it's a prevalent thing? I have political and social discussions with PLENTY of Black people (relatives/friends/etc.), I'm not a big Obama supporter and I have expressed my angst with some of his policies. I told them I was going to vote and voted for Gary Johnson, no one gave me any problems or attitudes, no one called me an "uncle Tom" or "sellout".

There are self described Black people on this forum who do agree with Obama and are democrats, none of them have ever given me an attitude or an insult and this is a forum where insults often fly. For someone who seemingly shuns "the victim card", it sure seems like some "Black conservatives" love to ply that card when they complain about "the Blacks" allegedly calling them Uncle Toms for no reason other than they are Black and conservative. :)



"While that does have some truth to it (if that quote is correct)..."

At the Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society in Boston, April, 1865, Fredrick Douglass delivered the following speech called “What the Black Man Wants.” In part:
“Everybody has asked the question, and they learned to ask it early of the abolitionists, "What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! If you see him on his way to school, let him alone, don't disturb him! If you see him going to the dinner table at a hotel, let him go! If you see him going to the ballot- box, let him alone, don't disturb him! [Applause.] If you see him going into a work-shop, just let him alone,--your interference is doing him a positive injury.”

Thanks for the entire quote that show the context! The ironic part is without Government intervention, those very things I put in bold above would not have happened. In my opinion, Government intervention to protect the Civil Liberties of it's Citizens is a good thing. I DO think that some Government programs lend themselves to be abused and I think that the generational cycle of dependency on that system should be clamped down on. In my opinion, to assert that those programs were started with a sinister purpose is pretty much an outlandish assertion. I think in some way whether on purpose or by mistake, it's insulting to "the Blacks" to act like all they want is "free stuff", favoritism, subsidies, etc.
I have stated over and over again that the Black people in my family (sisters, cousins, mother, grandparents cousins, etc.) and friends are Democrats, NONE of them are on Welfare, they all have CAREERS most of them are married, have children, and raise them VERY well.
 
[
At the Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society in Boston, April, 1865, Fredrick Douglass delivered the following speech called “What the Black Man Wants.” In part:
“Everybody has asked the question, and they learned to ask it early of the abolitionists, "What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! If you see him on his way to school, let him alone, don't disturb him! If you see him going to the dinner table at a hotel, let him go! If you see him going to the ballot- box, let him alone, don't disturb him! [Applause.] If you see him going into a work-shop, just let him alone,--your interference is doing him a positive injury.”

And white conservatives fought the black man's right to do those things every step of the way and used the government in every twisted manner they could invent to do so.
Yep!!!
 
While that does have some truth to it (if that quote is correct); how would the condition of Blacks have been if Government didn't pass and enforce the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments? How about the Civil rights Acts that some republicans like to claim that they "passed", that was Government doing something. How about the Government not stepping in when Blacks were being brutalized and oppressed by the Black Codes, Jim Crow, etc.?

You as a Black person would have told Government "to get out of the way" of the slave masters, KKK, and other groups of people who were systematically brutalizing, enslaving, and oppressing Black people?

There are plenty of Black Liberals who see the light and are doing quite well, they may not just agree with your particular brand of "light". If you as a conservative believe in "individualism", why would you seemingly want to attribute that "shunning" like it's a prevalent thing? I have political and social discussions with PLENTY of Black people (relatives/friends/etc.), I'm not a big Obama supporter and I have expressed my angst with some of his policies. I told them I was going to vote and voted for Gary Johnson, no one gave me any problems or attitudes, no one called me an "uncle Tom" or "sellout".

There are self described Black people on this forum who do agree with Obama and are democrats, none of them have ever given me an attitude or an insult and this is a forum where insults often fly. For someone who seemingly shuns "the victim card", it sure seems like some "Black conservatives" love to ply that card when they complain about "the Blacks" allegedly calling them Uncle Toms for no reason other than they are Black and conservative. :)



"While that does have some truth to it (if that quote is correct)..."

At the Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society in Boston, April, 1865, Fredrick Douglass delivered the following speech called “What the Black Man Wants.” In part:
“Everybody has asked the question, and they learned to ask it early of the abolitionists, "What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! If you see him on his way to school, let him alone, don't disturb him! If you see him going to the dinner table at a hotel, let him go! If you see him going to the ballot- box, let him alone, don't disturb him! [Applause.] If you see him going into a work-shop, just let him alone,--your interference is doing him a positive injury.”

Thanks for the entire quote that show the context! The ironic part is without Government intervention, those very things I put in bold above would not have happened. In my opinion, Government intervention to protect the Civil Liberties of it's Citizens is a good thing. I DO think that some Government programs lend themselves to be abused and I think that the generational cycle of dependency on that system should be clamped down on. In my opinion, to assert that those programs were started with a sinister purpose is pretty much an outlandish assertion. I think in some way whether on purpose or by mistake, it's insulting to "the Blacks" to act like all they want is "free stuff", favoritism, subsidies, etc.
I have stated over and over again that the Black people in my family (sisters, cousins, mother, grandparents cousins, etc.) and friends are Democrats, NONE of them are on Welfare, they all have CAREERS most of them are married, have children, and raise them VERY well.


There is an old saying that seems to apply here:

If the shoe doesn't fit, don't try to wear it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top