The Reason Why Democrats Were So Fanatical To Stop Kavanaugh

[protectionist]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

 

[jc456]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

it's why there is trump!!!!

 

[dblack]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

So now we can have true, unlimited majority rule! No pesky courts to stand in our way.

 

[S.J.]

Now they want to expand the SC to 11, but only if they get the White House.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Its simple. They have tacked hard to totalitarianism. Their religion is govt and they will lie at all costs to protect their sacrament, abortion.

 

[protectionist]

So now we can have true, unlimited majority rule! No pesky courts to stand in our way.

Nothing like having ONE MAN (or woman) overturn the will of MILLIONS of people - according to Democrats.

 

[dblack]

So now we can have true, unlimited majority rule! No pesky courts to stand in our way.

Nothing like having ONE MAN (or woman) overturn the will of MILLIONS of people - according to Democrats.

Nah... Democrats are mostly with you on this one. Diminishing the role of the Court will allow them to expand the role of government willy nilly. It's win-win for authoritarians on both sides of the aisle.

 

[protectionist]

Nah... Democrats are mostly with you on this one. Diminishing the role of the Court will allow them to expand the role of government willy nilly. It's win-win for authoritarians on both sides of the aisle.

Apparently the 4 examples I provided in the OP, were not enough to demonstrate to you the love affair Democrats have had with the courts for many years. If I wanted to take the time, I could have post a HUNDRED and 4, would that have been better for you ?

Losing the courts WEAPON is disaster for Democrats. You may not know it - they do.

And the role of the courts has not been diminished, it has merely changed hands from being in control of liberals to being in control of conservatives. It is still a massively important role. Democrats' use of it is what has diminished.

 

[Timmy]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

Wrong . It’s cause Kavanaugh is a douche who wasn’t worthy.

Answer this question : why was Goreish (however you spell his friggin name ) nomination so much smoother?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

Wrong . It’s cause Kavanaugh is a douche who wasn’t worthy.

Answer this question : why was Goreish (however you spell his friggin name ) nomination so much smoother?

History will always remember how the nomination process was treated by Democrats, just as it remembers your love of keeping blacks suppressed.

 

[Timmy]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

Wrong . It’s cause Kavanaugh is a douche who wasn’t worthy.

Answer this question : why was Goreish (however you spell his friggin name ) nomination so much smoother?

History will always remember how the nomination process was treated by Democrats, just as it remembers your love of keeping blacks suppressed.

Lol! Ah yes. The gop, friends of the blacks!

 

[Weatherman2020]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

Wrong . It’s cause Kavanaugh is a douche who wasn’t worthy.

Answer this question : why was Goreish (however you spell his friggin name ) nomination so much smoother?

History will always remember how the nomination process was treated by Democrats, just as it remembers your love of keeping blacks suppressed.

Lol! Ah yes. The gop, friends of the blacks!

Black employment is at an all time high right now.

 

[Pilot1]

One of the biggest reasons Trump was elected was due to Supreme Court appointments. We don't need more justices, like Ginsburg who HATE the Constitution.

 

[protectionist]

Wrong . It’s cause Kavanaugh is a douche who wasn’t worthy.

Answer this question : why was Goreish (however you spell his friggin name ) nomination so much smoother?

Since you don't know the answer to that, you should even deserve the dignity of a reply. Does 5-4 ring any bells ? And then combine that with the points made in the OP.

 

[Timmy]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

Wrong . It’s cause Kavanaugh is a douche who wasn’t worthy.

Answer this question : why was Goreish (however you spell his friggin name ) nomination so much smoother?

History will always remember how the nomination process was treated by Democrats, just as it remembers your love of keeping blacks suppressed.

Lol! Ah yes. The gop, friends of the blacks!

Black employment is at an all time high right now.

What number is that ? Vs the white unemployment number? Y’all never get specific.

and what trump policy specifically targeted black unemployment .


Here’s was Cons do . “Hey it’s a sunny day! Trump made a sunny day for black people!”

 

[Timmy]

Wrong . It’s cause Kavanaugh is a douche who wasn’t worthy.

Answer this question : why was Goreish (however you spell his friggin name ) nomination so much smoother?

Since you don't know the answer to that, you should even deserve the dignity of a reply. Does 5-4 ring any bells ? And then combine that with the points made in the OP.

That doesn’t make sense . Even if Kav doesn’t get in, Don will just nominate another conservative.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

^ This!

They were one election away from fundamentally transforming America into Venezuela while vampire squid Soros sucked away our prosperity. They weaponized the CIA and FBI turning it against their fellow Americans. They will pay for that. They were going to use the 5th SCOTUS gun grabber to white out our Constitutional rights - a coup, but perfectly "LEGAL" because it would have come from SCOTUS.

That's why I thank that Good Lord -- and Uncle Vlad _ with every fiber of my being for not allowing America to fall into Progressive Fascism.

 

[dblack]

Losing the courts WEAPON is disaster for Democrats. You may not know it - they do.

I think it's a disaster for everyone. The Court should protect the minority from overreaching government, regardless of who is pulling the strings.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Whether apparent to most Americans or not, Supreme Court Kavanaugh's confirmation was more than just about Roe vs Wade, same-sex marriage, and a few other issues. It was about the destruction of a weapon that Democrats have been using for decades, to get what they want, even when the American people are solidly lined up against them.

That weapon is the courts. With the courts on their side, they could rule America. The could shove aside the entire US Congress, state legislatures, presidents, governors, etc., and rely on court rulings, to strike down anything the elected representitives of the people put in place.
Even the basic bastions of democracy, initiatives and referenda weren't safe, as long as Democrats could go judge-shopping, find just the judge who would rule in their favor, and then file lawsuits. They could ultimately depend on the US Supreme Court to uphold their wishes, in the event of a few lower court losses.

Not any more. The SCOTUS is now solidly conservative, and with the 2 oldest justices (in their 80s), it is headed for a 7-2 conservative majority, which is likely to result in a 9-0 majority, as the 2 last liberals, feeling ineffective, would likely resign and seek lower court jobs, where they might be able to have some effect.

In addition, lower court conservative appointments by Trump, have been flourishing. More conservatives have been appointed to district and appeals courts over the past 2 years than ever before, and the days of Democrats using the courts to run the country are over.

Here's a sample of WHAT is now over >>

1. In 1994, Pete Wilson won the election for California governor by a landslide, while campaigning for Proposition 187 (to stop welfare to illegal aliens). Then, Proposition 187 won by an even bigger landslide (59 to 41%). It won every county in the state, except San Francisco.
Then the Democrats, ACLU, and other leftist do-gooders went to work, to overturn the will of the people. They went judge-shopping, found a liberal federal judge (Carter-appointed District judge Mariana Pfaelzer) to step in and annul the voters' victory. Wilson appealed the ruling, but the case dragged on, and the new governor (Gray Davis) didn't pursue the appeal.
The welfare benefits continued to flow. With the influx of massive amounts of illegal aliens from Mexico, they rewarded Davis with re-election in 2002, and California's budget continued to hemorrhage. In 2003, with a now $38 Billion deficit + signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal aliens, Davis was recalled, and fired by outraged Californians.
This is the kind of fiasco that are now (with Democrats no longer able to weaponize the courts) going to be just awful memories, although it will take years of deportation work to restore California back to some sense of Americanism and normalcy.

2. Although not as directly a result of court action, with Proposition 200 in Arizona (deny welfare to illegals), still the theat of court obstruction played a part in having the issue be defeated (despite landslide approval from Arizonans)

3. Proposition 227 in California (to restrict bilingual eduction in public schools), >> similar scenario.

These were early examples of Democrats using the courts and political pressure from them. More recent ones were liberal judges in Hawaii and Washington (state) who overturned President Trump's Muslim bans. Thankfully, after Judge Gorsuch was put on the SCOTUS, those lower court rulings were overturned, and the Muslim countries ban was upheld. It's a new day in America, and Democrats having lost their big weapon, are in full scale meltdown.

Pat Buchanan, State of Emergency, 2008.
Ann Coulter, Adios America!, 2015.

Wrong . It’s cause Kavanaugh is a douche who wasn’t worthy.

Answer this question : why was Goreish (however you spell his friggin name ) nomination so much smoother?

History will always remember how the nomination process was treated by Democrats, just as it remembers your love of keeping blacks suppressed.

Lol! Ah yes. The gop, friends of the blacks!

Black employment is at an all time high right now.

What number is that ? Vs the white unemployment number? Y’all never get specific.

and what trump policy specifically targeted black unemployment .


Here’s was Cons do . “Hey it’s a sunny day! Trump made a sunny day for black people!”

3.7 UE. Lowest black and hispanic UE in decades. This is upsetting to libs.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

 

[protectionist]

That doesn’t make sense . Even if Kav doesn’t get in, Don will just nominate another conservative.

5-4 doesn't make sense ? Back to the drawing board for you.

And we weren't talking about Kavanaugh vs other conservative judges, we were talking about Kavanaugh's appointment vs Gorsuch's. But that's OK. I've moved on to other things.