The reason why Trump is smarter than The CDC.

Trump isnā€™t a doctor, he just plays one on TWITTER!
He was right about the malaria drug and the cdc was wrong
No. He wasn't, as it is far from proven. There have been gobs of reports around the world, disputing the claim. Here are just a few:
Fact check: Hydroxychloroquine has not worked in treating COVID-19, studies show
Miriam Fauzia
USA TODAY July 21, 2020
Hydroxychloroquine: Europe Turns Away From Doctor Who Championed Drug With ā€˜Irresponsibleā€™ Study
Forbes, July 19, 2020
The results from two new drug trials have failed to find evidence that hydroxychloroquine works to treat Covid-19. And a new peer review by one of Europeā€™s top doctors has found the study conducted by French professor Raoultā€“advocate of hydroxychloroquineā€“was ā€œirresponsible.ā€ It appears that Europe is turning its back on the drugā€™s champion.
Hydroxychloroquine studies show drug is not effective for ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/07/16/hydroxychloroquine-studies-show-

Second U Of M Study Determines Hydroxychloroquine Does Not ...
Second U Of M Study Determines Hydroxychloroquine Does Not Treat COVID-19 Symptoms
Hydroxychloroquine is a commonly used anti-malaria drug, which has been promoted by President Donald Trump, despite the scientific evidence which proves its ineffectiveness.

New Studies Clarify What Drugs Help, Hurt for COVID-19 ...
New Studies Clarify What Drugs Help, Hurt for COVID-19
The same Oxford study also tested hydroxychloroquine in a rigorous manner and researchers previously said it did not help hospitalized patients with COVID-19. After 28 days, about 25.7% on hydroxychloroquine had died versus 23.5% given usual care -- a difference so small it could have occurred by chance.
 
CDC doesn't even know how to add and subtract, when a guy takes 6 test because he feels the first five were faulty and his sixth more reliable test is non covid then the CDC is supposed to subtract the five positive cases they counted on the same non covid person. Even if he tested positive you don't count the same people taking multiple tests unless you are part of the propaganda machine and are illegally politicizing a non partisan dept.of the gov't.-BUSTED!

NOW THINK, DOESN'T THIS help show a pattern to cheat in a multi count method that should concern those considering mail in ballots??-busted again!
 
Trump isnā€™t a doctor, he just plays one on TWITTER!
He was right about the malaria drug and the cdc was wrong
No. He wasn't, as it is far from proven. There have been gobs of reports around the world, disputing the claim. Here are just a few:
Fact check: Hydroxychloroquine has not worked in treating COVID-19, studies show
Miriam Fauzia
USA TODAY July 21, 2020
Hydroxychloroquine: Europe Turns Away From Doctor Who Championed Drug With ā€˜Irresponsibleā€™ Study
Forbes, July 19, 2020
The results from two new drug trials have failed to find evidence that hydroxychloroquine works to treat Covid-19. And a new peer review by one of Europeā€™s top doctors has found the study conducted by French professor Raoultā€“advocate of hydroxychloroquineā€“was ā€œirresponsible.ā€ It appears that Europe is turning its back on the drugā€™s champion.
Hydroxychloroquine studies show drug is not effective for ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/07/16/hydroxychloroquine-studies-show-

Second U Of M Study Determines Hydroxychloroquine Does Not ...
Second U Of M Study Determines Hydroxychloroquine Does Not Treat COVID-19 Symptoms
Hydroxychloroquine is a commonly used anti-malaria drug, which has been promoted by President Donald Trump, despite the scientific evidence which proves its ineffectiveness.

New Studies Clarify What Drugs Help, Hurt for COVID-19 ...
New Studies Clarify What Drugs Help, Hurt for COVID-19
The same Oxford study also tested hydroxychloroquine in a rigorous manner and researchers previously said it did not help hospitalized patients with COVID-19. After 28 days, about 25.7% on hydroxychloroquine had died versus 23.5% given usual care -- a difference so small it could have occurred by chance.
Lib academics can spin out a biased study at a moments notice

but when an academic risks censure from his peers by going against the party line that is news

 
Trump isnā€™t a doctor, he just plays one on TWITTER!
He was right about the malaria drug and the cdc was wrong
No. He wasn't, as it is far from proven. There have been gobs of reports around the world, disputing the claim. Here are just a few:
Fact check: Hydroxychloroquine has not worked in treating COVID-19, studies show
Miriam Fauzia
USA TODAY July 21, 2020
Hydroxychloroquine: Europe Turns Away From Doctor Who Championed Drug With ā€˜Irresponsibleā€™ Study
Forbes, July 19, 2020
The results from two new drug trials have failed to find evidence that hydroxychloroquine works to treat Covid-19. And a new peer review by one of Europeā€™s top doctors has found the study conducted by French professor Raoultā€“advocate of hydroxychloroquineā€“was ā€œirresponsible.ā€ It appears that Europe is turning its back on the drugā€™s champion.
Hydroxychloroquine studies show drug is not effective for ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/07/16/hydroxychloroquine-studies-show-

Second U Of M Study Determines Hydroxychloroquine Does Not ...
Second U Of M Study Determines Hydroxychloroquine Does Not Treat COVID-19 Symptoms
Hydroxychloroquine is a commonly used anti-malaria drug, which has been promoted by President Donald Trump, despite the scientific evidence which proves its ineffectiveness.

New Studies Clarify What Drugs Help, Hurt for COVID-19 ...
New Studies Clarify What Drugs Help, Hurt for COVID-19
The same Oxford study also tested hydroxychloroquine in a rigorous manner and researchers previously said it did not help hospitalized patients with COVID-19. After 28 days, about 25.7% on hydroxychloroquine had died versus 23.5% given usual care -- a difference so small it could have occurred by chance.
Maybe you shold try it to see if it helps with uncintrolled drooling.
 
CDC doesn't even know how to add and subtract, when a guy takes 6 test because he feels the first five were faulty and his sixth more reliable test is non covid then the CDC is supposed to subtract the five positive cases they counted on the same non covid person. Even if he tested positive you don't count the same people taking multiple tests unless you are part of the propaganda machine and are illegally politicizing a non partisan dept.of the gov't.-BUSTED!

NOW THINK, DOESN'T THIS help show a pattern to cheat in a multi count method that should concern those considering mail in ballots??-busted again!
To me it points out the state of reliability of the variety of tests out there being performed on Emergency Use Authorization. I have had 4 tests within the last 3 weeks. The last 3 or the 4 were done because the first test from one of the companies praised by the president showed positive.
We need more testing, but should be accurate testing. Time for CDC to publish accuracy studies on all the tests being conducted in this country, cut out all tests below a 94% accuracy and standardize the testing.
 
Trump isnā€™t a doctor, he just plays one on TWITTER!
He was right about the malaria drug and the cdc was wrong
No. He wasn't, as it is far from proven. There have been gobs of reports around the world, disputing the claim. Here are just a few:
Fact check: Hydroxychloroquine has not worked in treating COVID-19, studies show
Miriam Fauzia
USA TODAY July 21, 2020
Hydroxychloroquine: Europe Turns Away From Doctor Who Championed Drug With ā€˜Irresponsibleā€™ Study
Forbes, July 19, 2020
The results from two new drug trials have failed to find evidence that hydroxychloroquine works to treat Covid-19. And a new peer review by one of Europeā€™s top doctors has found the study conducted by French professor Raoultā€“advocate of hydroxychloroquineā€“was ā€œirresponsible.ā€ It appears that Europe is turning its back on the drugā€™s champion.
Hydroxychloroquine studies show drug is not effective for ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/07/16/hydroxychloroquine-studies-show-

Second U Of M Study Determines Hydroxychloroquine Does Not ...
Second U Of M Study Determines Hydroxychloroquine Does Not Treat COVID-19 Symptoms
Hydroxychloroquine is a commonly used anti-malaria drug, which has been promoted by President Donald Trump, despite the scientific evidence which proves its ineffectiveness.

New Studies Clarify What Drugs Help, Hurt for COVID-19 ...
New Studies Clarify What Drugs Help, Hurt for COVID-19
The same Oxford study also tested hydroxychloroquine in a rigorous manner and researchers previously said it did not help hospitalized patients with COVID-19. After 28 days, about 25.7% on hydroxychloroquine had died versus 23.5% given usual care -- a difference so small it could have occurred by chance.
Lib academics can spin out a biased study at a moments notice

but when an academic risks censure from his peers by going against the party line that is news

Some of the links I posted were from foreign studies. Are you saying the whole world is biased against poor little donnie, so they are faking their results? If so, what makes you think the favorable studies are not by right wing supporters of donnie and equally subject to being fake results? You got to admit, it is pretty unusual for a non-scientific position by someone who does not believe in science on a subject never tested beforek to get lucky and hit a breakthrough for the scientific community.
He really isn't a stable genius, you know. Not stable and certainly no genius. I am aware the even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while, even then it is pretty near where it fell from the tree, not out of the middle of nowhere.
 
A drug that has been used for decades is now deemed "dangerous". Funny how that happened all-of-a-sudden like, innit?
All-of-a-sudden? What's funny is that you think that any drug being labelled potentially dangerous is something new! That's one of the first lessons medical professionals learn.
 
Time for CDC to publish accuracy studies on all the tests being conducted in this country, cut out all tests below a 94% accuracy and standardize the testing.
Dont you think the liberal democrats are usingthe best tests their liberal brains can come up with?

Or do you think the Deep Staters at CDC ARE DOGGING IT TO HURT TRUMP POLITICALLY?
 
Time for CDC to publish accuracy studies on all the tests being conducted in this country, cut out all tests below a 94% accuracy and standardize the testing.
Dont you think the liberal democrats are usingthe best tests their liberal brains can come up with?

Or do you think the Deep Staters at CDC ARE DOGGING IT TO HURT TRUMP POLITICALLY?
Neither. I think that all scientists in the medical research community are pulling out the stops and trying everything in the book presently and writing new chapters in the attempt to combat the problem. A good thing in general, but there is a point where a regulatory body needs to step in and say "this test work" and "this test does not meet accuracy standards to be of value" in the fight. False positives and false negatives are counter productive.
I do not think CDC is trying to hurt trump. Trump is the biggest political threat to trump in the coronavirus epidemic. When the chips are down, adults want the truth. He has lied and misstated entirely too many times to be paid attention to, similarly to the political opinions of uninformed Hollywood stars opinions magnified for their Hollywood star power. Scientific truth is more likely found somewhere in the scientific community, not the political arena or the Hollywood Reporter pages.
 
Are you saying the whole world is biased against poor little donnie, so they are faking their results?
Oh please

everyone is well aware of the lib game called Dueling Academic Studies

We have been assaulted with them for decades

the malaria drug cant save everyone but it seems to help in many cases
 

Forum List

Back
Top