The republican party isn't racist

[2aguy]

Star Trek was never ever a conservative show.

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

 

[2aguy]

How about you name a few, along with the party they belong to...

I am not sure you have the IQ to understand the complexities involved in the shifting political party paradigm that took place in the middle decades of the 20th Century.

That being said, party affiliation is merely circumstantial...a convenient construct behind which conservatives and liberals of each party can move freely and vote freely. Obviously there is no mandated strict loyalty to one party or the other. Otherwise, one party would hold the reins of government in perpetuity.

Conservatism and Liberalism are the key terms here, not Republican or Democrat. Here is the answer you want >
Part (1) The True Democrats! | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Okay....so which poltical party is home to all of these openly racist groups and individuals....including barak obama, who attended an openly racist church for 20 years and called the openly racist pastor not only his friend, but allowed the openly racist pastor to marry him and michelle and baptize their children.....

Article that lists past democrat racism in detail...and other stuff post this...if it comes up...

Will Democrats Apologize for Slavery and Segregation The American Spectator

Articles When Erasing Symbols of Slavery Don t Forget the Democratic Party

Does it never get old attributing racism to the one group in this country conservatives/libertarians/Tea Party members who aren't racist.....? There are actual...honest to goodness racists in the democrat party, the party of racism...la raza, the hispanic racists, the NAACP, the Nation of Islam...black racists...including jesse jackson, al sharpton, jeremiah wright and barak obama, black racist leaders......since you guys voted for a racist...barak obama, who sat in a racist church for 20 years, allowed a black racist to marry him and his wife and a black racist to baptize his daughters, and have actual white democrats with ties to actual segregationists still in your party...bill clinton (a sexual predator to boot) whose political mentor was willam fulbright...an actual segregationist...and robert "sheets" byrd (named sheets by tip o'neal for his membership in the democrat kkk).......



Which party do these known racists and racist groups belong to.....

La Raza...hispanic racists
The nation of islam....black racists
the NAACP, the modern version...black racists (they just kicked out a white woman...remember?)
the congressional black caucus....

George takei...asian racist...
Al sharpton...black racist
jesse jackson...black racist
raul guitierrez...latino racist...
bill clinton...white racist....remember the old segregationists...he gave them medals and presented statues in their honor
robert "kkk" byrd...white racist
barak obama...black racist ( sat in a rabidly racist church for 20 years and was good friends with the racist pastor, the rabid racist pastor, jeremiah wright married the obama's and baptized their children0

So dumb fuck....which party is the home of the racists?

Billl whittle video

Been meaning to ask you this.

Why do you have a socialist character as your avatar?

Kirk wasn't a socialist…far from it….read the short Kindle book…The Politics of Star Trek…it is only a dollar at amazon…I have posted several times about the issues raised in Star Trek and how it is a conservative show…...

I will read that, it sounds very interesting.

Be that as it may, applying modern political labels to a fictional Post Scarcity Society is problematic at best.

Who knows what policies would be required to deal with magic replicators that can just make most food and products magically.

It was less about that than how Kirk dealt with the situations he faced…he did not face them as a lefty/modern liberal would.

 

[Sallow]

Star Trek was never ever a conservative show.

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

 

[Correll]

Star Trek was never ever a conservative show.

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

 

[Sallow]

Star Trek was never ever a conservative show.

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Right Wing Conservative Hero Adolf Hitler.

 

[2aguy]

Star Trek was never ever a conservative show.

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Sorry…..Kirk never behaves in a collectivist or left wing way…….try reading the analysis of the actions he takes….not a lefty at all…whatever Rodenberry may have believed it did not infect Kirk………

The Politics of Star Trek

 

[2aguy]

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

 

[Sallow]

Star Trek was never ever a conservative show.

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Sorry…..Kirk never behaves in a collectivist or left wing way…….try reading the analysis of the actions he takes….not a lefty at all…whatever Rodenberry may have believed it did not infect Kirk………

The Politics of Star Trek

Of course he behaves in a collectivist way..he's part of the military, one of the biggest collectivist/socialist ventures in human history. Additionally he never makes decisions without first consulting his officers.

 

[2aguy]

Star Trek was never ever a conservative show.

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

The Politics of Star Trek




Kirk stands fixedly, even obstinately, for the principles of universal freedom and against collectivism, ignorance, and passivity. In “Errand of Mercy,” the episode that first introduces the show’s most infamous villains, he cannot comprehend why the placid Organians are willing to let themselves be enslaved by the Klingon Empire. Their pacifism disgusts him. Kirk loves peace, but he recognizes that peace without freedom is not truly peace.

 

[Sallow]

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

 

[2aguy]

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Sorry…..Kirk never behaves in a collectivist or left wing way…….try reading the analysis of the actions he takes….not a lefty at all…whatever Rodenberry may have believed it did not infect Kirk………

The Politics of Star Trek

Of course he behaves in a collectivist way..he's part of the military, one of the biggest collectivist/socialist ventures in human history. Additionally he never makes decisions without first consulting his officers.

Where does discussing an issue with other people become part of the Borg collective…really, try thinking before you post.

 

[Correll]

The episode A Private LIttle War was a blatant endorsement of the US involvement in Proxy wars against the Soviet Union, even Vietnam.

Basically you have to cherry pick episodes to make your "point". They were written by different writers, none of which "blatantly" endorsed anything. At the core of the show, however, was the Federation. A socialistic and egalitarian society. That was by the design of Gene Rodenberry.

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Right Wing Conservative Hero Adolf Hitler.

So, none of them, got it.

Can you point to an episode where the Federate was shown to have no human rights or mandated a One Child policy with a defacto policy of infant murder?

 

[2aguy]

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

Yeah….read what he said in private and what his inner circle said….hitler was an atheist who hated christianity…...

 

[Correll]

Kirk was not a socialist. And of course the federation would not work….so that is why it is science fiction……The Next Generation was more left wing than the original series….

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

So, you find the words of Adolf Hitler to be credible?

 

[Sallow]

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

So, you find the words of Adolf Hitler to be credible?

He's as credible as any other Christian. Which by the way? The Majority of Nazis and Germans were during that period and still are today.

 

[hunarcy]

Ben Carson would be an awesome President.

If you disagree then you are a racist.

only old white people are running for the Democratic party's presidential nomination. Diversity is on the Republican side. In 2012 the libs personally destroyed Herman Cain, because he was a black guy.

We destroyed him because he was a moron.

And you thought he was a moron based only on the fact that he was a Republican.

 

[2aguy]

The show was written by a guy who admired Chinese Communism. Each character is and extension of that mindset.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

Yeah….read what he said in private and what his inner circle said….hitler was an atheist who hated christianity…...

In case after case Kirk goes against the left wing beliefs of Spock and McCoy and makes decisions based on "classical liberal"/Modern American conservative principals…not socialist collectivism.

 

[2aguy]

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

So, you find the words of Adolf Hitler to be credible?

He's as credible as any other Christian. Which by the way? The Majority of Nazis and Germans were during that period and still are today.

The nazis weren't christian, many of the Germans were…and if you violate the 10 commandments you are not a Christian…and mass murder kinda violates those commandments….

 

[Correll]

Which ones embodied the idea of genocide and mass murder?

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

So, you find the words of Adolf Hitler to be credible?

He's as credible as any other Christian. Which by the way? The Majority of Nazis and Germans were during that period and still are today.

Err, no he is not.

History shows Hitler to have been a great liar and a masterful user of propaganda and deception.

It is insane to take his words at face value.

 

[2aguy]

I think Rodenberry was pretty critical of the Christian Hero Adolf Hitler.

hitler was an anti christian, atheist.

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

So, you find the words of Adolf Hitler to be credible?

He's as credible as any other Christian. Which by the way? The Majority of Nazis and Germans were during that period and still are today.

Err, no he is not.

History shows Hitler to be a great liar and a masterful user of propaganda and deception.

It is insane to take his words at face value.

And his inner circle confirmed he hated christianity…...