The Sanctity of Marriage and the Ultimate Hypocrisy

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Update: Kim Davis in the news again.....

Gov. Matt Bevin Says Kim Davis Is An Inspiration To ‘The Children Of America’ | Right Wing Watch

Yesterday, Liberty Counsel released a video promotion for the book narrated by founder and chairman Mat Staver that featured not only Davis but Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin, who heaped praise on Davis for “her boldness [and] her conviction” in “knowing that she was right.”

Just listen to this horseshit!!

“

Against all the scorn, all the enmity, all the vitriol, all the nastiness, she stood firm,” Bevin said. “I think Kim Davis is without question an inspiration, not only to leaders like myself—people in the public arena and those outside the public arena—but to my children, the children of America. People, even if they disagree with her, have got to respect the fact that here is a woman who was willing to put it all on the line out of conviction for what she believed and knew to be her right as an American citizen. And her faith and her conviction in the fact that that faith was protected by the First Amendment in our Constitution—in our Bill of Rights, specifically—is something that she was willing to put front and center, and if that’s not admirable, if that’s not something we would want all Americans to emulate, I don’t know what is.”

Maybe she is an inspiration to his children, but what about all of the children who she would deny an opportunity to have married parents who would both be their legal guardian?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

She greatly sinned. Then she accepted Christ and was forgiven. She has been a faithful Christian since.

There's no hypocrisy.

Trying to convict her for past transgressions before she was saved.
Call it out! Whose followers do that?

How convenient. Don’t do as she does do as she says.


Would she have listened before she was saved?

Proves you don't know how Accepting Jesus works.

 

[sealybobo]

She greatly sinned. Then she accepted Christ and was forgiven. She has been a faithful Christian since.

There's no hypocrisy.

Trying to convict her for past transgressions before she was saved.
Call it out! Whose followers do that?

How convenient. Don’t do as she does do as she says.


Would she have listened before she was saved?

Proves you don't know how Accepting Jesus works.

Nor do I want to. Sickening religion.

Biblical Jesus was real.
There is no contemporary evidence for Jesus’ existence or the Bible’s account of his life; no artefacts, dwellings, works of carpentry, self-written manuscripts, court records, eyewitness testimony, official diaries, birth records, reflections on his significance or written disputes about his teachings. Nothing survives from the time in which he is said to have lived.

All historical references to Jesus derive from hearsay accounts written decades or centuries after his supposed death. These historical references generally refer to early Christians rather than a historical Jesus and, in some cases, directly contradict the Gospels or were deliberately manufactured.

The Gospels themselves contradict one-another [2] on many key events and were constructed by unknown authors up to a century after the events they describe are said to have occurred. They are not eyewitness accounts. The New Testament, as a whole, contains many internal inconsistencies as a result of its piecemeal construction and is factually incorrect on several historical claims, such as the early existence of Nazareth, the reign of Herod and the Roman census. Like the Old Testament, it too has had entire books and sections redacted.

The Biblical account of Jesus has striking similarities with other mythologies and textsand many of his supposed teachings existed prior to his time. It is likely the character was either partly or entirely invented [2] by competing first century messianic cults from an amalgamation of Greco-Roman, Egyptian and Judeo-Apocalyptic myths and prophecies.

Even if Jesus’ existence could be established, this would in no way validate Christian theology or any element of the story portrayed in the Bible, such as the performance of miracles or the resurrection. Simply because it is conceivable a heretical Jewish preacher named Yeshua lived circa 30 AD, had followers and was executed, does not imply the son of a god walked the Earth at that time.

The motivation for belief in a divine, salvational Jesus breaks down when you accept evolution:

“Now, if the book of Genesis is an allegory, then sin is an allegory, the Fall is an allegory and the need for a Savior is an allegory – but if we are all descendants of an allegory, where does that leave us? It destroys the foundation of all Christian doctrine—it destroys the foundation of the gospel.” – Ken Ham

 

[sealybobo]

She greatly sinned. Then she accepted Christ and was forgiven. She has been a faithful Christian since.

There's no hypocrisy.

Trying to convict her for past transgressions before she was saved.
Call it out! Whose followers do that?

How convenient. Don’t do as she does do as she says.


Would she have listened before she was saved?

Proves you don't know how Accepting Jesus works.

You prove every day you don't know how accepting Mohammad works. So what right? Who gives a fuck?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Ahh yes attack the religion remind me when you have done the same to Islam?

 

[mdk]

I loved when she got released and a Huckabee staffer blocked Cruz from taking the stage.