Wehrwolfen
Senior Member
- May 22, 2012
- 2,750
- 340
- 48
By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown
03-17-13
Its even worse than we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that Barack Obama intentionally conspired with Americas enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could negotiate the release of a hostage and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election!
Benghazi-gate is not about a bogus YouTube video series of lies. Its not about the Obama Administrations foreign policy ineptitude. We are dealing with something much more sinister something potentially treasonous and the following questions, posed in an article in The New American, go to the heart of the matter:
[Excerpt]
Read more:
The Scandal That Will Bring Obama Down
03-17-13
Its even worse than we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that Barack Obama intentionally conspired with Americas enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could negotiate the release of a hostage and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election!
Benghazi-gate is not about a bogus YouTube video series of lies. Its not about the Obama Administrations foreign policy ineptitude. We are dealing with something much more sinister something potentially treasonous and the following questions, posed in an article in The New American, go to the heart of the matter:
1. What was the Obama administrations full role in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed revolutionaries take over Libya in the first place?
2. Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?
3. What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which, as the report states, was never a consulate despite establishment media claims?
4. Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the success in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?
5. Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a protest over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?
6. Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obamas unconstitutional regime change war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?
2. Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?
3. What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which, as the report states, was never a consulate despite establishment media claims?
4. Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the success in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?
5. Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a protest over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?
6. Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obamas unconstitutional regime change war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?
[Excerpt]
Read more:
The Scandal That Will Bring Obama Down
