The School Lunches Malia And Sasha Eat Vs. The Crap Michelle Obama Has Foisted On America

Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.
Moron.

As usual, you can't deny the truth of what I wrote so you toss out a childish insult.

Thanks.
 
What is hypocritical about wanting better lunches for poor kids?

They aren't better, numskull. Kids hate them and won't eat them.

Kids have always hated school lunches

But Michelle Obama advocates that schools not pass off a Twinkie and bottle of Yoo-hoo as a lunch

Not true. When I was in school the lunches were better than what my mother provided. Pizza, pigs in a blanket and plenty of other dishes were very popular.

And now they may have tacos, salad bars, vegetarian and soups

Yeah, I can just see the look of sheer joy on a kid's face when confronted by a salad bar or a veggie burger.
Michelle is actually teaching kids capitalism. Wherever her food programs operate, there is a thriving underground market of all the things kids like to eat. A savvy pint sized entrepreneur can make a fortune operating a black market of sodas, doritos, and ho-hos. What valuable life experience!
 
Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.
Moron.

As usual, you can't deny the truth of what I wrote so you toss out a childish insult.

Thanks.
You said, "[f]unny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. The point is, the hypocrisy of the elite left (the 1%) in feeding their kids gourmet meals while managing changes to the "public" meals at "public" schools to turn said public meals into food kids won't eat.

You said, "[w]hy don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?" This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. Only libtards like you vote against the best interests of your kids.

You said, "[y]ou don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. No one is bitching that the kids at private schools get good food, ya moron, they are bitching that the bitch in the WH is forcing schools to sell crap to our kids, you POS moron.

In short. You are a POS moron.
 
They aren't better, numskull. Kids hate them and won't eat them.

Kids have always hated school lunches

But Michelle Obama advocates that schools not pass off a Twinkie and bottle of Yoo-hoo as a lunch

Not true. When I was in school the lunches were better than what my mother provided. Pizza, pigs in a blanket and plenty of other dishes were very popular.

And now they may have tacos, salad bars, vegetarian and soups

Yeah, I can just see the look of sheer joy on a kid's face when confronted by a salad bar or a veggie burger.
Michelle is actually teaching kids capitalism. Wherever her food programs operate, there is a thriving underground market of all the things kids like to eat. A savvy pint sized entrepreneur can make a fortune operating a black market of sodas, doritos, and ho-hos. What valuable life experience!
Ayup a whole generation of kids are getting to see just exactly what kind of a future they will have with democrats in power.
 
Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.
Moron.

As usual, you can't deny the truth of what I wrote so you toss out a childish insult.

Thanks.
You said, "[f]unny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. The point is, the hypocrisy of the elite left (the 1%) in feeding their kids gourmet meals while managing changes to the "public" meals at "public" schools to turn said public meals into food kids won't eat.

You said, "[w]hy don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?" This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. Only libtards like you vote against the best interests of your kids.
You said, "[y]ou don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. No one is bitching that the kids at private schools get good food, ya moron, they are bitching that the bitch in the WH is forcing schools to sell crap to our kids, you POS moron.

In short. You are a POS moron.
This is a great opportunity for businesses in the food industry that supply lunches or wants to supply lunches to create appetizing food that are lower in fat and sugar that students like....

If I was one of the food suppliers for schools, it's the first thing I would work on....and then knock all the nasty tasting food providers out of business and grab it all! :D
 
Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.
Moron.

As usual, you can't deny the truth of what I wrote so you toss out a childish insult.

Thanks.
You said, "[f]unny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. The point is, the hypocrisy of the elite left (the 1%) in feeding their kids gourmet meals while managing changes to the "public" meals at "public" schools to turn said public meals into food kids won't eat.

You said, "[w]hy don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?" This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. Only libtards like you vote against the best interests of your kids.
You said, "[y]ou don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. No one is bitching that the kids at private schools get good food, ya moron, they are bitching that the bitch in the WH is forcing schools to sell crap to our kids, you POS moron.

In short. You are a POS moron.
This is a great opportunity for businesses in the food industry that supply lunches or wants to supply lunches to create appetizing food that are lower in fat and sugar that students like....

If I was one of the food suppliers for schools, it's the first thing I would work on....and then knock all the nasty tasting food providers out of business and grab it all! :D
Or we could end the school lunch program, given that the federal government has failed to spend our tax dollars on school lunches wisely, and let the kids eat meals prepared by their parents.
 
Remember folks, it is them then there is us. Michelle just won't let us eat bread or cake.

Obama Kids Lunches Vs. Public School Food The Daily Caller

For Tuesday, Dec. 9, the scrumptious, bountiful lunch menu for both the middle school and the upper school at Sidwell Friends is:

Potato Sausage Soup; Firecracker Slaw; California Chef’s Salad; All Natural Jamaican Jerk Chicken Wings; Sweet Potato Black Bean Bake; Sautéed Local Greens; Gemelli Alfredo; Sliced Pineapple
Just can't leave the kids alone, huh?

Look idiot, the Obama girls don't and shouldn't attend a public school, where the guidelines are established to ensure children eat a healthy meal.
 
Hey go for it.....if you want the tax payers to pay for what Private schools give for their lunches, then be prepared for your taxes to go up.

If the pictures are correct there is a big gap between what is being offered to the Obama's and what is being given to public school children.


Just shut up and pay your taxes, peasant.
 
Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.
Moron.

As usual, you can't deny the truth of what I wrote so you toss out a childish insult.

Thanks.
You said, "[f]unny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. The point is, the hypocrisy of the elite left (the 1%) in feeding their kids gourmet meals while managing changes to the "public" meals at "public" schools to turn said public meals into food kids won't eat.

You said, "[w]hy don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?" This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. Only libtards like you vote against the best interests of your kids.
You said, "[y]ou don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. No one is bitching that the kids at private schools get good food, ya moron, they are bitching that the bitch in the WH is forcing schools to sell crap to our kids, you POS moron.

In short. You are a POS moron.
This is a great opportunity for businesses in the food industry that supply lunches or wants to supply lunches to create appetizing food that are lower in fat and sugar that students like....

If I was one of the food suppliers for schools, it's the first thing I would work on....and then knock all the nasty tasting food providers out of business and grab it all! :D
Or we could end the school lunch program, given that the federal government has failed to spend our tax dollars on school lunches wisely, and let the kids eat meals prepared by their parents.
Parents that can afford to pack their lunches SHOULD DO SO, but it seems they have gotten lazy and it is easier for them to just give their kids the money to buy lunches. For those that can't afford to pack a healthy lunch for their kids, then the school lunches will have to do.

the federal government DOES NOT pay for this program in full do they? It was my understanding that they only contribute a little towards it and the school local and state funding provide the rest. If parents insist on having tastier and fat and sugar calorie high foods for their kids, they can drop the federal funding and pay for it all themselves.... they do have a choice in the matter.
 
Who knew the Obama daughters set the school lunch menu? I didn't know that. Did you know that freewilly?

Freewilly, how is it that you don't know that our plutocrats (and their kids) have it much better than the rest of us?

Why must you go there? No one mentioned the kids except in the context it is their lunch. This is more about Michelle's meddling in that which she has no right.

Alex I'll take typical liberal deflection for $800.
 
Remember folks, it is them then there is us. Michelle just won't let us eat bread or cake.

Obama Kids Lunches Vs. Public School Food The Daily Caller

For Tuesday, Dec. 9, the scrumptious, bountiful lunch menu for both the middle school and the upper school at Sidwell Friends is:

Potato Sausage Soup; Firecracker Slaw; California Chef’s Salad; All Natural Jamaican Jerk Chicken Wings; Sweet Potato Black Bean Bake; Sautéed Local Greens; Gemelli Alfredo; Sliced Pineapple

Are you advocating that public schools pay more for school lunches or that private schools be prohibited from serving more than a public school does?

We could always go back to the days of Reagan when ketchup was counted as a vegetable
or the kids could bring their own lunches to school! Right?
 
Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.
who gives the wealthy more wealth? What the hell does that mean?
 
If you want children to eat the food that is served at private schools then send your children to a private school. Seems simple enough.
who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.
 
If you want children to eat the food that is served at private schools then send your children to a private school. Seems simple enough.
who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.
 
Remember folks, it is them then there is us. Michelle just won't let us eat bread or cake.

Obama Kids Lunches Vs. Public School Food The Daily Caller

For Tuesday, Dec. 9, the scrumptious, bountiful lunch menu for both the middle school and the upper school at Sidwell Friends is:

Potato Sausage Soup; Firecracker Slaw; California Chef’s Salad; All Natural Jamaican Jerk Chicken Wings; Sweet Potato Black Bean Bake; Sautéed Local Greens; Gemelli Alfredo; Sliced Pineapple

Are you advocating that public schools pay more for school lunches or that private schools be prohibited from serving more than a public school does?

We could always go back to the days of Reagan when ketchup was counted as a vegetable
or the kids could bring their own lunches to school! Right?

Who ever said they couldn't?
 

As usual, you can't deny the truth of what I wrote so you toss out a childish insult.

Thanks.
You said, "[f]unny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. The point is, the hypocrisy of the elite left (the 1%) in feeding their kids gourmet meals while managing changes to the "public" meals at "public" schools to turn said public meals into food kids won't eat.

You said, "[w]hy don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?" This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. Only libtards like you vote against the best interests of your kids.
You said, "[y]ou don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that." This is a lie, more particularly this is a "moronic" lie. No one is bitching that the kids at private schools get good food, ya moron, they are bitching that the bitch in the WH is forcing schools to sell crap to our kids, you POS moron.

In short. You are a POS moron.
This is a great opportunity for businesses in the food industry that supply lunches or wants to supply lunches to create appetizing food that are lower in fat and sugar that students like....

If I was one of the food suppliers for schools, it's the first thing I would work on....and then knock all the nasty tasting food providers out of business and grab it all! :D
Or we could end the school lunch program, given that the federal government has failed to spend our tax dollars on school lunches wisely, and let the kids eat meals prepared by their parents.
Parents that can afford to pack their lunches SHOULD DO SO, but it seems they have gotten lazy and it is easier for them to just give their kids the money to buy lunches. For those that can't afford to pack a healthy lunch for their kids, then the school lunches will have to do.

the federal government DOES NOT pay for this program in full do they? It was my understanding that they only contribute a little towards it and the school local and state funding provide the rest. If parents insist on having tastier and fat and sugar calorie high foods for their kids, they can drop the federal funding and pay for it all themselves.... they do have a choice in the matter.

It depends on the status of the family. For a free plate the reimbursement rate is $2.98.

http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/cn/NAPs14-15.pdf

For the school districts it is a signification amount of money over a years time.
 
Why should the FEDERAL government dictate what a state school should serve?

that is TAXPAYER MONIES

Parents need to get involved in your schools

Not one single school in the country is require to participate in the program. To qualify for the federal money they must meet certain guidelines.

In other words, they are required to comply. Screwing taxpayers out of their money does not qualify as a "free choice."
 

Forum List

Back
Top