The School Lunches Malia And Sasha Eat Vs. The Crap Michelle Obama Has Foisted On America

[rightwinger]

Remember folks, it is them then there is us. Michelle just won't let us eat bread or cake.

Obama Kids Lunches Vs. Public School Food The Daily Caller

For Tuesday, Dec. 9, the scrumptious, bountiful lunch menu for both the middle school and the upper school at Sidwell Friends is:

Potato Sausage Soup; Firecracker Slaw; California Chef’s Salad; All Natural Jamaican Jerk Chicken Wings; Sweet Potato Black Bean Bake; Sautéed Local Greens; Gemelli Alfredo; Sliced Pineapple

Are you advocating that public schools pay more for school lunches or that private schools be prohibited from serving more than a public school does?

We could always go back to the days of Reagan when ketchup was counted as a vegetable

Ketchup comes from tomatoes.
Tomatoes are vegetable. Only fools and idiots would say tomatoes are not vegetable.
With only a few exceptions if it grows in the garden it is vegetable if it grows in the orchard it is a fruit.

I believe tomatoes are one of those exceptions.

Are tomatoes a fruit or vegetable Organic Gardening

Tomatoes come from a flower which makes them a fruit

 

[mdk]

If you want children to eat the food that is served at private schools then send your children to a private school. Seems simple enough.

who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

If only there was a board of some kind, made up of elected officials from the community where parents could have their concerns publicly heard. If only...

 

[rightwinger]

If you want children to eat the food that is served at private schools then send your children to a private school. Seems simple enough.

So if parents want a say in the food their kids are served in school, they can just fuck off. Is that your position, asshole?

That is hardly my postion, asshole. Parents do have say in what their kids eat. If you don't like the food options at school you can always do the unthinkable and pack a lunch for them or you could bring your whiny complaints to the local school board. In the amount of time you folks have bitched in this thread you could have packed your kids a lunch or filed a complaint with the school board.

That is exactly what your position is, asshole. Taxpayers have to cough up the dough to the federal government, but then they get no say in how that money is used. Only the powerful like Moochelle get any input to that decision. Now please explain why any sane taxpayer would want to send more money to the federal government for this shit.

Are you really so dumb you think Michelle Obama runs the government?

And of course you have a say in what your kids at school eat. GET OFF YOUR FAT ASS AND MAKE THEIR FUCKING LUNCHES!

Come on Conservatives......Stick it to Michelle

Make your own damn lunch

That will show her

 

[bripat9643]

If you want children to eat the food that is served at private schools then send your children to a private school. Seems simple enough.

who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

 

[Howey]

If you want children to eat the food that is served at private schools then send your children to a private school. Seems simple enough.

who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

And what you're saying is you're too lazy to get off your fat ass and make your kid's lunches. Gotcha.

 

[BlindBoo]

they had peanut and jelly avaliable for days they didn't like the menu and they tried to take that away from them too

Really, shit for brains?

They don't allow peanut butter in schools because of allergies!

Gawd allmighty how can you be so narrow minded and stupid?

Many schools give away PB&J sandwiches to students who can't afford a meal or are over their credit limit.

 

[bripat9643]

who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

And what you're saying is you're too lazy to get off your fat ass and make your kid's lunches. Gotcha.

What I'm saying is that you and your Komrades are a gang of assholes who want to impose your "standards" on people who don't want them. Parents paid for school lunches with their taxes. They are the only ones who should determine what they contain.

 

[BlindBoo]

Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.

We aren't attacking the 1%. We are attacking the hypocrites who want to impose a diet on the children of the middle class while their kid gorge on gourmet meals.

Only a totalitarian bootlicker wouldn't understand the difference.

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

 

[Coyote]

If you want children to eat the food that is served at private schools then send your children to a private school. Seems simple enough.

who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

They already pay twice for it - school lunches aren't necessarily "free". Parents can choose to use it, use it sometimes or not at all. Just because you don't like General Tso's chicken don't bitch about Michelle, pack your own pbj and twinkies.

Everyone - including non-parents pays via taxes.

 

[mdk]

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

And what you're saying is you're too lazy to get off your fat ass and make your kid's lunches. Gotcha.

What I'm saying is that you and your Komrades are a gang of assholes who want to impose your "standards" on people who don't want them. Parents paid for school lunches with their taxes. They are the only ones who should determine what they contain.

Wouldn't your time be better spent bitching to your school board instead of bitching on an Internet forum?

 

[bripat9643]

who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

They already pay twice for it - school lunches aren't necessarily "free". Parents can choose to use it, use it sometimes or not at all. Just because you don't like General Tso's chicken don't bitch about Michelle, pack your own pbj and twinkies.

Everyone - including non-parents pays via taxes.

These menus are determined by the federal government. What you're saying is that taxpayers and parents can go fuck themselves if they don't like what their kids are being served in public schools.

That is so beautifully liberal.

You make it so abundantly clear why the taxpayers gave all your heroes the boot in the last election.

 

[bripat9643]

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

And what you're saying is you're too lazy to get off your fat ass and make your kid's lunches. Gotcha.

What I'm saying is that you and your Komrades are a gang of assholes who want to impose your "standards" on people who don't want them. Parents paid for school lunches with their taxes. They are the only ones who should determine what they contain.

Wouldn't your time be better spent bitching to your school board instead of bitching on an Internet forum?

No, it wouldn't, dumbass. The federal government is imposing these menus on our schools, so how would bitching to the school board help?

 

[Coyote]

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

They already pay twice for it - school lunches aren't necessarily "free". Parents can choose to use it, use it sometimes or not at all. Just because you don't like General Tso's chicken don't bitch about Michelle, pack your own pbj and twinkies.

Everyone - including non-parents pays via taxes.

These menus are determined by the federal government. What you're saying is that taxpayers and parents can go fuck themselves if they don't like what their kids are being served in public schools.

That is so beautifully liberal.

You make it so abundantly clear why the taxpayers gave all your heroes the boot in the last election.

The federal government only provides broad guidelines for the menus - they vary considerably (google will help you out there).

I'm trying to figure out how expecting parents to get off their lazy duffs and make a lunch if they're so bent out of shape is telling them to "go fuck themselves".

 

[bripat9643]

Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.

We aren't attacking the 1%. We are attacking the hypocrites who want to impose a diet on the children of the middle class while their kid gorge on gourmet meals.

Only a totalitarian bootlicker wouldn't understand the difference.

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

 

[Coyote]

Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.

We aren't attacking the 1%. We are attacking the hypocrites who want to impose a diet on the children of the middle class while their kid gorge on gourmet meals.

Only a totalitarian bootlicker wouldn't understand the difference.

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

 

[bripat9643]

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

They already pay twice for it - school lunches aren't necessarily "free". Parents can choose to use it, use it sometimes or not at all. Just because you don't like General Tso's chicken don't bitch about Michelle, pack your own pbj and twinkies.

Everyone - including non-parents pays via taxes.

These menus are determined by the federal government. What you're saying is that taxpayers and parents can go fuck themselves if they don't like what their kids are being served in public schools.

That is so beautifully liberal.

You make it so abundantly clear why the taxpayers gave all your heroes the boot in the last election.

The federal government only provides broad guidelines for the menus - they vary considerably (google will help you out there).

I'm trying to figure out how expecting parents to get off their lazy duffs and make a lunch if they're so bent out of shape is telling them to "go fuck themselves".

Yeah, I bet you are still trying to figure that out. Any five-year-old could figure it out, but you can't.

I've never seen such utter servility.

 

[bripat9643]

Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.

We aren't attacking the 1%. We are attacking the hypocrites who want to impose a diet on the children of the middle class while their kid gorge on gourmet meals.

Only a totalitarian bootlicker wouldn't understand the difference.

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

 

[Coyote]

If parents are unhappy with their school lunch program, they need to bitch to their state's DoE - that's who regulates it.

National School Lunch Act - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Any school is eligible to receive NSLP for its students; meals come from a number of different sources, they can come from on-site production, vended meal from a NSLP caterer or in most schools provided by the local school board centralized kitchen.

This is usually regulated by each state's Department of Education's nutrition services. Regardless of who provides the food (on-site production, catered-vended, or school board kitchen), the raw materials come from USDA as donated commodities; in the case of vended meals, the caterer must use and credit the school for the commodities received.

 

[Coyote]

Funny that the RWs attack what the schools for the wealthy serve their students while voting to give the 1% even more wealth.

Why don't you fools vote for the best interests of your own kids?

You don't want high quality food to be fed to our school kids but then bitch when wealthy schools do exactly that.

Make up your minds.

We aren't attacking the 1%. We are attacking the hypocrites who want to impose a diet on the children of the middle class while their kid gorge on gourmet meals.

Only a totalitarian bootlicker wouldn't understand the difference.

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

 

[bripat9643]

If parents are unhappy with their school lunch program, they need to bitch to their state's DoE - that's who regulates it.

National School Lunch Act - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Any school is eligible to receive NSLP for its students; meals come from a number of different sources, they can come from on-site production, vended meal from a NSLP caterer or in most schools provided by the local school board centralized kitchen.

This is usually regulated by each state's Department of Education's nutrition services. Regardless of who provides the food (on-site production, catered-vended, or school board kitchen), the raw materials come from USDA as donated commodities; in the case of vended meals, the caterer must use and credit the school for the commodities received.

Duh, wrong. The federal government regulates it. If the taxpayers want their money back, then the state has to comply with federal guidelines. You and your Komrades have already admitted that.