The School Lunches Malia And Sasha Eat Vs. The Crap Michelle Obama Has Foisted On America

[bripat9643]

We aren't attacking the 1%. We are attacking the hypocrites who want to impose a diet on the children of the middle class while their kid gorge on gourmet meals.

Only a totalitarian bootlicker wouldn't understand the difference.

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

In other words, they have no choice about paying for shit they don't want.

End of discussion.

 

[mdk]

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

And what you're saying is you're too lazy to get off your fat ass and make your kid's lunches. Gotcha.

What I'm saying is that you and your Komrades are a gang of assholes who want to impose your "standards" on people who don't want them. Parents paid for school lunches with their taxes. They are the only ones who should determine what they contain.

Wouldn't your time be better spent bitching to your school board instead of bitching on an Internet forum?

No, it wouldn't, dumbass. The federal government is imposing these menus on our schools, so how would bitching to the school board help?

And you think bitching here is going to help? Not hardly. Get off your dead ass and raise hell with other like minded parents at the next school board meeting. Threaten their jobs next election if they don't make the changes you wish. Or you could do nothing and complain on a forum instead.

 

[BlindBoo]

If you want children to eat the food that is served at private schools then send your children to a private school. Seems simple enough.

who pays for the meals at the private school?

God the stupid stick hits around here are plenty. Wow, you are a clueless human.

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

Taxpayers? Do families of 4 making less than 44,123 a year pay much in federal taxes? If you make more than that then your kids don't qualify for the program. You pay full price (and the School gets back a few cents on the meal you buy too), and you get to help the poor kids eat.

 

[rightwinger]

We aren't attacking the 1%. We are attacking the hypocrites who want to impose a diet on the children of the middle class while their kid gorge on gourmet meals.

Only a totalitarian bootlicker wouldn't understand the difference.

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

My school printed the menu a month in advance

If I didn't like the choice I could brown bag it

 

[Coyote]

If parents are unhappy with their school lunch program, they need to bitch to their state's DoE - that's who regulates it.

National School Lunch Act - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Any school is eligible to receive NSLP for its students; meals come from a number of different sources, they can come from on-site production, vended meal from a NSLP caterer or in most schools provided by the local school board centralized kitchen.

This is usually regulated by each state's Department of Education's nutrition services. Regardless of who provides the food (on-site production, catered-vended, or school board kitchen), the raw materials come from USDA as donated commodities; in the case of vended meals, the caterer must use and credit the school for the commodities received.

Duh, wrong. The federal government regulates it. If the taxpayers want their money back, then the state has to comply with federal guidelines. You and your Komrades have already admitted that.

Broad guidelines. Not specific menu choices. For example, ketchup can no longer be counted as a vegtable serving.

 

[Coyote]

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

In other words, they have no choice about paying for shit they don't want.

End of discussion.

The horror!

Just in case you haven't realized it yet....we all have to pay for shit we don't want. I'm paying for the education of other people's kids. It's all Michelle's fault too!!!

 

[BlindBoo]

Look if want your kids to enjoy the fine foods served at private schools then quit complaining send your children to a private school.

Wow, you are a classless ass.

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

They already pay twice for it - school lunches aren't necessarily "free". Parents can choose to use it, use it sometimes or not at all. Just because you don't like General Tso's chicken don't bitch about Michelle, pack your own pbj and twinkies.

Everyone - including non-parents pays via taxes.

These menus are determined by the federal government. What you're saying is that taxpayers and parents can go fuck themselves if they don't like what their kids are being served in public schools.

That is so beautifully liberal.

You make it so abundantly clear why the taxpayers gave all your heroes the boot in the last election.

Ah, well there the problem. The feds don't determine the menu's.

 

[Coyote]

When I was a kid we didn't qualify for the subsidized lunch program so we could either buy it or brown bag it. We always brown bagged it. It's the same today as it was then. Only...maybe they got rid of the Friday "Mystery Meat".

 

[BlindBoo]

To qualify for free meals a family of 4 must have an annual income of $31,005 or below. For a reduce meals (.30 for brk and .40 for lunch) the annual income threshold is 44,123.

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

In other words, they have no choice about paying for shit they don't want.

End of discussion.

I had no choice in sending/paying troops to invade and occupy Iraq. So you don't have a choice about spending money feeding poor kids in school.

 

[jc456]

talk about a messed up thread!!!

 

[bripat9643]

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

In other words, they have no choice about paying for shit they don't want.

End of discussion.

The horror!

Just in case you haven't realized it yet....we all have to pay for shit we don't want. I'm paying for the education of other people's kids. It's all Michelle's fault too!!!

Thanks for admitting you don't give a shit about parents, taxpayers or children. You're a blessing to humanity!

Why don't all you libturds just come out and admit that you don't give a shit what parents want?

 

[bripat9643]

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

In other words, they have no choice about paying for shit they don't want.

End of discussion.

I had no choice in sending/paying troops to invade and occupy Iraq. So you don't have a choice about spending money feeding poor kids in school.

The federal government has to run the military. On the other hand, there's no justification for the federal government to stick its nose into the running of local public schools.

 

[bripat9643]

In other words, parents of kids in public schools can fuck off. That's what you meant to say, right?

They can make lunch. Buying a school lunch is entirely optional.

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

They already pay twice for it - school lunches aren't necessarily "free". Parents can choose to use it, use it sometimes or not at all. Just because you don't like General Tso's chicken don't bitch about Michelle, pack your own pbj and twinkies.

Everyone - including non-parents pays via taxes.

These menus are determined by the federal government. What you're saying is that taxpayers and parents can go fuck themselves if they don't like what their kids are being served in public schools.

That is so beautifully liberal.

You make it so abundantly clear why the taxpayers gave all your heroes the boot in the last election.

Ah, well there the problem. The feds don't determine the menu's.

Yes they do. That's the whole point of the program. What are the "guidelines" if not controls on menus?

 

[bripat9643]

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

In other words, they have no choice about paying for shit they don't want.

End of discussion.

I had no choice in sending/paying troops to invade and occupy Iraq. So you don't have a choice about spending money feeding poor kids in school.

In other words, parents can go fuck themselves if they don't like the choices imposed on them by the federal government.

You're a fine liberal.

 

[bripat9643]

Taxpayers have already paid for those school lunches, moron. That part isn't optional. what you're saying is that parents have the option of paying twice.

Liberals are mentally retarded. That's the only explanation for such idiocies. You have to talk to them like they are children.

And what you're saying is you're too lazy to get off your fat ass and make your kid's lunches. Gotcha.

What I'm saying is that you and your Komrades are a gang of assholes who want to impose your "standards" on people who don't want them. Parents paid for school lunches with their taxes. They are the only ones who should determine what they contain.

Wouldn't your time be better spent bitching to your school board instead of bitching on an Internet forum?

No, it wouldn't, dumbass. The federal government is imposing these menus on our schools, so how would bitching to the school board help?

And you think bitching here is going to help? Not hardly. Get off your dead ass and raise hell with other like minded parents at the next school board meeting. Threaten their jobs next election if they don't make the changes you wish. Or you could do nothing and complain on a forum instead.

The school board isn't responsible, you fucking dumbass. The federal government is reponsible.

Why I will do is lobby every chance I get to abolish public schools. This is just one more example of how fucked up they are. Kids can't even get a decent lunch because bootlickers and toadies want to use them for social experiments.

 

[rightwinger]

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

In other words, they have no choice about paying for shit they don't want.

End of discussion.

I had no choice in sending/paying troops to invade and occupy Iraq. So you don't have a choice about spending money feeding poor kids in school.

The federal government has to run the military. On the other hand, there's no justification for the federal government to stick its nose into the running of local public schools.

You want federal money for lunches, you have to accept federal nutrition standards

You are free to turn down federal subsidies

 

[mdk]

And what you're saying is you're too lazy to get off your fat ass and make your kid's lunches. Gotcha.

What I'm saying is that you and your Komrades are a gang of assholes who want to impose your "standards" on people who don't want them. Parents paid for school lunches with their taxes. They are the only ones who should determine what they contain.

Wouldn't your time be better spent bitching to your school board instead of bitching on an Internet forum?

No, it wouldn't, dumbass. The federal government is imposing these menus on our schools, so how would bitching to the school board help?

And you think bitching here is going to help? Not hardly. Get off your dead ass and raise hell with other like minded parents at the next school board meeting. Threaten their jobs next election if they don't make the changes you wish. Or you could do nothing and complain on a forum instead.

The school board isn't responsible, you fucking dumbass. The federal government is reponsible.

Why I will do is lobby every chance I get to abolish public schools. This is just one more example of how fucked up they are. Kids can't even get a decent lunch because bootlickers and toadies want to use them for social experiments.

Good luck with that mate.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Remember folks, it is them then there is us. Michelle just won't let us eat bread or cake.

Obama Kids Lunches Vs. Public School Food The Daily Caller

For Tuesday, Dec. 9, the scrumptious, bountiful lunch menu for both the middle school and the upper school at Sidwell Friends is:

Potato Sausage Soup; Firecracker Slaw; California Chef’s Salad; All Natural Jamaican Jerk Chicken Wings; Sweet Potato Black Bean Bake; Sautéed Local Greens; Gemelli Alfredo; Sliced Pineapple

Are you advocating that public schools pay more for school lunches or that private schools be prohibited from serving more than a public school does?

We could always go back to the days of Reagan when ketchup was counted as a vegetable

Ketchup comes from tomatoes.
Tomatoes are vegetable. Only fools and idiots would say tomatoes are not vegetable.
With only a few exceptions if it grows in the garden it is vegetable if it grows in the orchard it is a fruit.

Tomatoes are berries, actually.

There is overlap between the biological categories of fruits and berries and the culinary category of vegetable.

 

[bripat9643]

So how does that justify preventing parents from having a say in the diet their kids are fed in school?

They do have a say.

Really? How?

Voting choices.
Brown bagging it.

In other words, they have no choice about paying for shit they don't want.

End of discussion.

The horror!

Just in case you haven't realized it yet....we all have to pay for shit we don't want. I'm paying for the education of other people's kids. It's all Michelle's fault too!!!

Fine, repeal it all.

The bottom line: you don't give a flying fuck about what parents, taxpayers and children want.

 

[bripat9643]

What I'm saying is that you and your Komrades are a gang of assholes who want to impose your "standards" on people who don't want them. Parents paid for school lunches with their taxes. They are the only ones who should determine what they contain.

Wouldn't your time be better spent bitching to your school board instead of bitching on an Internet forum?

No, it wouldn't, dumbass. The federal government is imposing these menus on our schools, so how would bitching to the school board help?

And you think bitching here is going to help? Not hardly. Get off your dead ass and raise hell with other like minded parents at the next school board meeting. Threaten their jobs next election if they don't make the changes you wish. Or you could do nothing and complain on a forum instead.

The school board isn't responsible, you fucking dumbass. The federal government is reponsible.

Why I will do is lobby every chance I get to abolish public schools. This is just one more example of how fucked up they are. Kids can't even get a decent lunch because bootlickers and toadies want to use them for social experiments.

Good luck with that mate.

People who agree with me are growing in numbers.