Pop23
Gold Member
How do you know none of those details exist? You are basing your entire analysis on an interview she gave to the Washington post and a letter she wrote to a senator. Maybe if a professional interviewed her those details would surface, or maybe the reasons why she didn’t remember would make more sense. Or maybe it would be apparent that she was making it up. You just don’t know, none of us do. I don’t see how you be so confident that she is lying. I’m just asking to look at the entire picture and not just one side. The points I brought up are valid and opposers are continuously avoiding them to talk about her not remembering a date and location. That’s pretty weak in my book.Well I hope for your sake nothing bad ever happens to you since you would have such a bad memory.If I got shot in the foot at a party I’d remember who shot me. If I wasn’t paying attention when somebody gave me a ride to the party then I might not remember where exactly it was at... I’d be a little worried about the hole in my foot to take note of the street signs on the way out. So I don’t think knowing directions and the identities of the assaulters is related.I would be willing to bet if you went to a party and someone shot you in the foot you would have perfect recall of every thing that you saw and did. If it was half as traumatic as she claimed then she should have better recall. Have never heard of anyone that has been molested that could not describe every detail down to smells.You got some serious fluff in there. First off the foreclosure story is unsubstantiated right wing propaganda being used to support a motive of her lying. Show me one credible network reporting that story. I don’t think you can. I can show you Fox refuting it if you don’t believe me.She originally told a therapist that there were four boys in the room others were in the house and more were outside. Since the letter came out she bows claims that the notes taken by the therapist are wrong.
She claims she does not know who was responsible for the party.
She claims she does not know how she got there.
She claims she does not know where the party was.
She claims she does not know on what date it happened.
She claims she does not know how she got home.
She claims she told no one until 2012 when she told a therapist.
Both of the boys say they have never seen anything or done anything even similar.
She has a reason to hate Kavanaugh in that his mother was involved as the judge in her parents foreclosure. Considering the foreclosure one can assume that the Kavanaugh's had more money.
She hates Trump and wrote a letter against his policies.
Suddenly another woman who was not in her circle of friends says that she heard about it but does not know any particulars. How did she hear about it if the accussor did not tell anyone?
The FBI did six background checks on the guy and found nothing. Now suddenly all the people that claimed they should be believed are saying that they missed things.
There are so many holes in her story that you could fly a 747 through it and not hurt the paint.
Also all the holes you pointed out aren’t evidence that she is lying. She either didn’t remember those details or she didn’t want to disclose them to a reporter. Perhaps if she was interviewed under oath by an FBI agent there would be more details.
She told the therapist the same story except there were four guys in the room. I could see her not saying much to a reporter but there was no need to withhold anything from the therapist. She also gave no particulars in her letter.
Could it be that she had a run in with someone and she is blaming Kavanaugh? Is it possible a drunk Kavanaugh was knocked into her and while trying to get up she got touched? I am trying to find something that points to her telling the truth but considering all the holes it does not look very likely.
Considering the past of certain other allegations on others one has to consider who and how this was brought into the open.
She supposedly said that she would testify. Now wants an investigation before she will. Knowing that it will take months or longer and if she decides to she can not testify and not be held accountable. But the chances are good that she will have done the best to block Kavanaugh's appointment and perhaps ruined his reputation.
Also Kavanaugh denies ever being at the party so this is an all or nothing thing, can’t be a misunderstanding in the bedroom or an accidental grab with a lie being exposed.
Also if she is lying, why does she want the FBI to investigate so bad? Why would she implicate two people in the assault instead of just one? How does that make any sense?
Lastly. It doesn’t take months to do an expanded background check on this intel. They did it in 3 days with Anitra Hill. They could wrap this one with a few interviews.
I know a number of women who were raped or were assaulted. My wife was molested at six. They can all tell you exacltly what happened where and when. The smallest detail is still very vivid in their minds.
The main difference here is there is nothing. No date, no location, no names of anyone else, not even a house color. At least Hill gave enough details they had something to work with.
As I stated I was hoping there might be some way to try and believe her but as you at least got that right it is either yes or no.
As I stated she can try and have the thing investigated then decide to back out as she has done. She would be safe even though she has done her damage.
There is over a hundred thousand go fund me page for her right now. So she will get paid very well.
Guess we will see what happens at 10:00 on Friday. It may not even matter after that.
But you’re right, Monday will show us a lot.
And.......
Your basing your entire defense on the same. Even though you’ve been schooled at least a couple dozen times as to how her claims don’t hold water.
It’s time for you to get serious medication.