Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dear old Dad Trump raised his offspring to be criminal grifters just like he is. Nice guy.
"Hire family, they won't talk".
Two important points. Truth is an absolute defense to libel. And Ivanka was involved in the Trump SOHO scam. Because she advertised the building as being more occupied than it actually was, and second that it was in SOHO.Of course, you have no evidence of any crime. If you say that publicly, they can sue you.
Trump did it because he's had larceny running thru his veins since the day he was born. It's in his DNA. Trump didn't drink or do drugs. He got his jollies pulling tax scams & screwing people like he did with Trump U.
Trump UniversityEVIDENCE??????????????????????????????????
Cultist reflexNot true.As far as a "case against Trump":
If the facts asserted in the indictment are true, all that is needed for a case against Trump is showing he signed off on any of it.
Make your own points!the employee uses self-employment tax shelter, avoiding taxes.
Tell me more!
In the case of the $747,622 in "consulting fees" they were actually a gift,In the case of the $747,622 in "consulting fees" they were actually a gift, because no consulting services were actually provided. And gifts, except for the first $25 are not deductible from a businesses taxes.She still had to pay taxes on the money, nimrod.
Welp, time to re read the thread and to read the article you didn't read but commented on anyway. There are other articles you can read as well, if you can muster the energy.I don't know what "self-employment tax shelter" you're talking about.
Gee, it's starting to sound like the payer and payee reported the money differently and incorrectly. Maybe somebody should investigate!If she paid taxes on the "consulting fees" they weren't a gift.
Follow the law, no worries. Good luck.Democrats have been using the IRS to harass political opponents forever. Corrupt hypocritical moonbats.
A Keogh plan is for self employed individuals. It basically mimics a 401k, but allows the individual to contribute far more because there is no business there to contribute as would be the case in a 401k.I don't know what "self-employment tax shelter" you're talking about.
How can I discuss your point if you won't explain your point?
Gee, it's starting to sound like the payer and payee reported the money differently and incorrectly
Welp, time to re read the thread and to read the article you didn't read but commented on anyway. There are other articles you can read as well, if you can muster the energy.I don't know what "self-employment tax shelter" you're talking about.
A Keogh plan is for self employed individuals. It basically mimics a 401k, but allows the individual to contribute far more because there is no business there to contribute as would be the case in a 401k.I don't know what "self-employment tax shelter" you're talking about.
How can I discuss your point if you won't explain your point?
Nope. There's a law about claiming benefits for self-employment when you are definitely NOT self employed.No law against funding a Keogh.
There's a law about claiming benefits for self-employment when you are definitely NOT self employed.
The benefits provided by a Keogh, tax free contributions to a retirement plan.Which benefits?
The benefits provided by a Keogh, tax free contributions to a retirement plan.Which benefits?
If they just claim to be a consultant for the tax benefits, it's against the law.If she had income as a consultant, there is no law against using a Keogh.
As were Al Capone and Leona Helmsley's convictions. What's the saying? Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered. LOLYou want proof the NY tax case against Trump is political? It's run by the New York politicians, not the state tax agency.
If they just claim to be a consultant for the tax benefits, it's against the law.
