GLASNOST
Gold Member
I don't think so. Much of the Baltic is already in NATO's reach. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.That doesn't matter, basically. What is needed from Sweden is land and sea swathes freely used by Nato forces.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think so. Much of the Baltic is already in NATO's reach. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.That doesn't matter, basically. What is needed from Sweden is land and sea swathes freely used by Nato forces.
You are determined to make the most absurd comments on this forum.Given how pathetic you guys have been, Sweden is probably feeling pretty confident by now. Especially since you couldn’t get by the Finns! LOL
Southern and Eastern part of the Baltic, with Denmark being on the West. In this configuration, the Eastern part is the most vulnerable.I don't think so. Much of the Baltic is already in NATO's reach. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.
Swedish troops are as flaccid as Biden's dick and rockets & missiles don't need proximity.Southern and Eastern part of the Baltic, with Denmark being on the West. In this configuration, the Eastern part is the most vulnerable.
If you look at a map, you will see that three Baltic states form an appendix which can be cut off by Russia's offensive from Belarus and Kaliningrad oblast. Basically, in this configuration defending these three states becomes meaningless.
Joining Finland and Sweden to Nato forms a whole new flanc for Russian troops to put their attention to. Also, it makes possible to organize massive air and sea 'bridges' for Nato troops all across the Baltic.
What Swedish troops are doesn't matter, basically.Swedish troops are as flaccid as Biden's dick and rockets & missiles don't need proximity.
Yes, idiot, if you don't want nazi Germany to strengthen, you attack nazis when it wants to annex Czechoslovakia, and don't give it to them in Munich.
Because the politically-saturated Time Magazine said so, right?
Not necessarily - fact is that Russia since 2014 and especially since 2022 has turned into an authoritarian state. Many people try to cover up the issue of their own countries being fake democracies (factually ruled/controlled by fascist minded groups) and therefore love to use the term Fascist onto authoritarian ruled countries (makes them feel better and more righteous).Because the politically-saturated Time Magazine said so, right?
And many Russian expats. What do you call a state that doesn’t allow its biggest rival party on the ballot?Because the politically-saturated Time Magazine said so, right?