The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics on Wednesday revised down its tally of total employment in March 2023 by 306,000.

[Cellblock2429]

Well, it looks like there was some serious massaging of the jobs numbers in 2023. Things weren't as rosy as the Democrats and the mainstream media claimed. Who is responsible for this deliberate manipulation?

U.S. job growth wasn't quite as strong as it appeared last year after government revision

U.S. employment in March was revised down by 306,000, mostly reflecting somewhat lower job growth in the prior 12 months. Job gains were still strong

www.usatoday.com

The change mostly means there were about 300,000 fewer job gains from April 2022 through March 2023 than first estimated.

Put another way, instead of adding a booming average of 337,000 jobs a month during that 12-month period, the nation gained a still vigorous 311,500 jobs monthly, on average.

The agency’s annual benchmark revision is based chiefly on state unemployment insurance records that reflect actual payrolls. Its estimates in monthly jobs reports are based on surveys. Wednesday’s estimate was preliminary and could be revised further early next year.

 

[AntonToo]

You want Democrats...to apologize for 311,500 job growth a month?

Sure, as soon as Republicans will get on their knees to beg for forgiveness for 2.7 millions jobs lost under Trump.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Word in the 2024 numbers will be revised down tomorrow.

Guessing the mainstream media won't report this like they did when the numbers were first released.


.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You want Democrats...to apologize for 311,500 job growth a month?

Sure, as soon as Republicans will get on their knees to beg for forgiveness for 2.7 millions jobs lost under Trump.

Dumbass, your party's great numbers are just people going back to work because of Covid

 

[shockedcanadian]

Well, it looks like there was some serious massaging of the jobs numbers in 2023. Things weren't as rosy as the Democrats and the mainstream media claimed. Who is responsible for this deliberate manipulation?

U.S. job growth wasn't quite as strong as it appeared last year after government revision

U.S. employment in March was revised down by 306,000, mostly reflecting somewhat lower job growth in the prior 12 months. Job gains were still strong

www.usatoday.com

The change mostly means there were about 300,000 fewer job gains from April 2022 through March 2023 than first estimated.

Put another way, instead of adding a booming average of 337,000 jobs a month during that 12-month period, the nation gained a still vigorous 311,500 jobs monthly, on average.

The agency’s annual benchmark revision is based chiefly on state unemployment insurance records that reflect actual payrolls. Its estimates in monthly jobs reports are based on surveys. Wednesday’s estimate was preliminary and could be revised further early next year.

Relax, Harris/Walz are bringing joy back to America. Joy Gdamn it!

 

[IM2]

Dumbass, your party's great numbers are just people going back to work because of Covid

No these are jobs created beyond what came bac after COVID. Furthermore it was said that most ofthe jobs ostduring COVID woud never come back so...

And last, Trump was creating fewer jobs than Obama did befire the pandemic hit.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No these are jobs created beyond what came bac after COVID. Furthermore it was said that most ofthe jobs ostduring COVID woud never come back so...

And last, Trump was creating fewer jobs than Obama did befire the pandemic hit.

I don't care, dumbass, you're as stupid as a stump

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Put another way, instead of adding a booming average of 337,000 jobs a month during that 12-month period, the nation gained a still vigorous 311,500 jobs monthly, on average.

Did Trump ever average 311,500 jobs per month for 12 months?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Word in the 2024 numbers will be revised down tomorrow.

Guessing the mainstream media won't report this like they did when the numbers were first released.


.

Every Aug they release an update to the previous year. This year some are predicting a pretty big change

 

[shockedcanadian]

Did Trump ever average 311,500 jobs per month for 12 months?

Biden did so well that he and Harris had record low approval ratings and to quote Pelosi last night, "I did what I had to do".

All of this reminds me of this kid:

 

[AntonToo]

Dumbass, your party's great numbers are just people going back to work because of Covid

Dumbass why the hell do you want Democrats to appologize for what you admit are great numbers?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Dumbass why do you want Democrats to appologize for strong job growth?

It's not growth...are you really this dense?

 

[bendog]

Well, it looks like there was some serious massaging of the jobs numbers in 2023. Things weren't as rosy as the Democrats and the mainstream media claimed. Who is responsible for this deliberate manipulation?

U.S. job growth wasn't quite as strong as it appeared last year after government revision

U.S. employment in March was revised down by 306,000, mostly reflecting somewhat lower job growth in the prior 12 months. Job gains were still strong

www.usatoday.com

The change mostly means there were about 300,000 fewer job gains from April 2022 through March 2023 than first estimated.

Put another way, instead of adding a booming average of 337,000 jobs a month during that 12-month period, the nation gained a still vigorous 311,500 jobs monthly, on average.

The agency’s annual benchmark revision is based chiefly on state unemployment insurance records that reflect actual payrolls. Its estimates in monthly jobs reports are based on surveys. Wednesday’s estimate was preliminary and could be revised further early next year.

Cool. Rate cut coming.

 

[AntonToo]

Biden did so well

Wrong answer.

The correct answer is NO.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Cool. Rate cut coming.

Too late but you don't have a clue soooo ....

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It's not growth...are you really this dense?

More than 300,000 jobs a month...after we made up all the jobs lost to COIVD is not growth?

Are you drunk today?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Too late but you don't have a clue soooo ....

It was late, but it is not too late.

The only people still predicting a crash are the moron MAGA cult members that need one for a chance to win the election

 

[justoffal]

You want Democrats...to apologize for 311,500 job growth a month?

Sure, as soon as Republicans will get on their knees to beg for forgiveness for 2.7 millions jobs lost under Trump.

Pandemic

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Well, it looks like there was some serious massaging of the jobs numbers in 2023. Things weren't as rosy as the Democrats and the mainstream media claimed. Who is responsible for this deliberate manipulation?

U.S. job growth wasn't quite as strong as it appeared last year after government revision

U.S. employment in March was revised down by 306,000, mostly reflecting somewhat lower job growth in the prior 12 months. Job gains were still strong

www.usatoday.com

The change mostly means there were about 300,000 fewer job gains from April 2022 through March 2023 than first estimated.

Put another way, instead of adding a booming average of 337,000 jobs a month during that 12-month period, the nation gained a still vigorous 311,500 jobs monthly, on average.

The agency’s annual benchmark revision is based chiefly on state unemployment insurance records that reflect actual payrolls. Its estimates in monthly jobs reports are based on surveys. Wednesday’s estimate was preliminary and could be revised further early next year.

Damn, I just caught it.

your link is a year old.

The numbers for this year are not out till tomorrow

 

[AntonToo]

More than 300,000 jobs a month...after we made up all the jobs lost to COIVD is not growth?

Are you drunk today?

Oh, I didn't realize Lass is ever sober.