The unbiased William Barr, U.S. Attorney General

[IM2]

And if it doesn't get cleared up pretty soon...Trump goes into the next election looking like a criminal trying to hide his crimes

Hmmmm . . . . . Wrong. Dims looks like the criminals. They are trying to hide Hillary's crimes, and Comey's and Brennan's, and Clapper's.

They may look like criminals to you, but they had not been indicted for any crimes so they are not.

Are people supposed to be worried about letters while uranium was sold or an impoverished Haiti did not get resources it should have and nothing done about it?

You going to add whitewater to this herd of dead horses?

 

[IM2]

And if it doesn't get cleared up pretty soon...Trump goes into the next election looking like a criminal trying to hide his crimes

Maybe you need to see the results of the Mueller report in summary?
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION

Is that clear enough? Or is your low IQ brain simply unable to comprehend what just happened, what the above means, is that clear now?

We have not seen what the Mueller report says. Now what about the other charges he is facing?

 

[22lcidw]

And if it doesn't get cleared up pretty soon...Trump goes into the next election looking like a criminal trying to hide his crimes

Hmmmm . . . . . Wrong. Dims looks like the criminals. They are trying to hide Hillary's crimes, and Comey's and Brennan's, and Clapper's.

They may look like criminals to you, but they had not been indicted for any crimes so they are not.

Are people supposed to be worried about letters while uranium was sold or an impoverished Haiti did not get resources it should have and nothing done about it?

You going to add whitewater to this herd of dead horses?

More then that. There is no justice with the likes of you. So not caring about the health of any of them, the destruction of their areas of living, and even a dissolution of our nation to a few countries would be preferable. I want to live in peace. Yo represent turmoil. Do it to yourselves.

 

[kyzr]

And if it doesn't get cleared up pretty soon...Trump goes into the next election looking like a criminal trying to hide his crimes

Maybe you need to see the results of the Mueller report in summary?
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION

Is that clear enough? Or is your low IQ brain simply unable to comprehend what just happened, what the above means, is that clear now?

We have not seen what the Mueller report says. Now what about the other charges he is facing?

Barr summarized what the Mueller report says.
What other imaginary charges are you dreaming about now? (hint: there are none)
No collusion, No Obstruction, end of story, game over.

 

[bripat9643]

The support of this man's opinion shows that republicans don't give a damn about the rule of law unless they can use it to hurt others. As you read this memo understand that when he did this he removed any impartiality he had pertaining to this matter and should have recused himself.

Read the memo from William Barr

So sane, fair Americans cannot consider Barrs opinion credible. If Barr refuses to provide congress what they need, then we must ask about the potential cover up.

Trump hating numskulls like you believe that anyone who doesn't hate the President should have to recuse himself.

Did any Democrat ever ask Holder or Lynch to recuse themselves?

I don't like Trump and have not liked him for over 30 years. What reason would Holder or Lynch have to recuse themselves? Barr wrote a not requested 19 page memo to the congress in opposition to the SC investigating of Trump. He was biased in this regard and had no business being part of this. The attorney generals job is not to protect the president. That would be the job of the white house council.

So you believe Lynch was not biased about investigating Hillary or Trump? She told Comey she had no interest in prosecuting Hillary. That should be obstruction of justice right there.

 

[bripat9643]

And if it doesn't get cleared up pretty soon...Trump goes into the next election looking like a criminal trying to hide his crimes

Hmmmm . . . . . Wrong. Dims looks like the criminals. They are trying to hide Hillary's crimes, and Comey's and Brennan's, and Clapper's.

They may look like criminals to you, but they had not been indicted for any crimes so they are not.

Shit bags like you keep calling Trump a criminal. What has he been indicted for?

 

[OKTexas]

The support of this man's opinion shows that republicans don't give a damn about the rule of law unless they can use it to hurt others. As you read this memo understand that when he did this he removed any impartiality he had pertaining to this matter and should have recused himself.

Read the memo from William Barr

So sane, fair Americans cannot consider Barrs opinion credible. If Barr refuses to provide congress what they need, then we must ask about the potential cover up.

And the commie conspiracy theories continue, eh comrade? LMAO

.

Commie conspiracy theory my ass.

Read the memo from William Barr

Poor thing, it was nothing but legal theorizing between lawyers, written by a private citizen with zero access to the investigation. I find it amazing how you commies will cling to the most flimsy straws to try to maintain your propaganda. Enjoy you defeat as America moves on with a major lesson learned.

.

 

[Zorro!]

The support of this man's opinion shows that republicans don't give a damn about the rule of law unless they can use it to hurt others. As you read this memo understand that when he did this he removed any impartiality he had pertaining to this matter and should have recused himself.

Read the memo from William Barr

So sane, fair Americans cannot consider Barrs opinion credible. If Barr refuses to provide congress what they need, then we must ask about the potential cover up.

Barr isn't going to break the law by releasing the Mueller report without redaction.

Barr Will Find Spying On Trump Directed By Obama.

In any criminal investigation where the suspect is not immediately known, the first question usually asked is who would have the most to gain? As we follow the bread crumbs of the text messages of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page and await release of the House Intelligence Committee’s memo regarding the collusion between the DNC, the Hillary Clinton campaign, the DOJ and FBI to interfere with the 2016, ensure the election of Hillary and the defeat or impeachment of Donald Trump, the answer to that question is clear, one Barack Hussein Obama.

Can it be believed that as key players in the Obama administration like Strzok and Page, as well as FBI Director James Comey, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, number 4 at Justice Bruce Ohr, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and many others were linked in a vast criminal conspiracy to keep Hillary Clinton out of prison, and Donald Trump out of the White House, Barack Obama was blissfully unaware of all this?

 

[Uncensored2008]

The support of this man's opinion shows that republicans don't give a damn about the rule of law unless they can use it to hurt others. As you read this memo understand that when he did this he removed any impartiality he had pertaining to this matter and should have recused himself.

Read the memo from William Barr

So sane, fair Americans cannot consider Barrs opinion credible. If Barr refuses to provide congress what they need, then we must ask about the potential cover up.

Eric Holder

Loretta Lynch


Shut the fuck up you hypocritical pile of shit...

 

[skye]

GOD Bless William Barr, too!



He is a real winner a true Patriot!

 

[captkaos]

If Barr was hired to protect the president this is what it would look like. Now watch as they fight tooth and nail to prevent the American people from ever seeing the actual report.

During confirmation The Dems Loved this Guy and Confirmed him. Ooops! They thought he was someone they could Intimidate Politically, Ooops again. They'll refer to him as Bill "The Hammer" Barr when it's all over for the Conspirators.

 

[wamose]

Democrats just don't like people who fight back against their bigotry. I especially liked when the Pa. representative, Cartwright, accused Barr of irresponsibly destroying healthcare. Barr made him look like an idiot without raising his voice or name calling, both of which Cartwright used copiously. It looks like we have a keeper at AG.

 

[dudmuck]

Democrats just don't like people who fight back against their bigotry. I especially liked when the Pa. representative, Cartwright, accused Barr of irresponsibly destroying healthcare. Barr made him look like an idiot without raising his voice or name calling, both of which Cartwright used copiously. It looks like we have a keeper at AG.

Income > $500k: Guaranteed tax free comprehensive coverage with access to the finest hospitals.

Income < $500k: GoFundMe

 

[basquebromance]

Trump campaign email: “Just this week, Attorney General William Barr said what the President has thought all along, he believes ‘unlawful spying did occur’ against Donald J. Trump's presidential campaign…”

 

[Zorro!]

The support of this man's opinion shows that republicans don't give a damn about the rule of law unless they can use it to hurt others. As you read this memo understand that when he did this he removed any impartiality he had pertaining to this matter and should have recused himself.

Read the memo from William Barr

So sane, fair Americans cannot consider Barrs opinion credible. If Barr refuses to provide congress what they need, then we must ask about the potential cover up.

Trump’s attorney-general nominee helped Mueller conclude his work within DOJ guidelines.

He has demonstrated the ability to reason through complex legal questions in a rigorously academic way. Thinking these issues through is what we expect of a properly functioning Justice Department does: considering them against jurisprudence, statutes, rules, regulations, and Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinions, with a healthy respect for facts that we do not know or about which we could be wrong — facts that could alter the analysis.

That is precisely what Bill Barr did in June, when he penned a memorandum to top Justice Department officials on a matter of immense national significance: the obstruction aspect of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of President Trump.

Barr was not prejudging the facts. He was addressing the law and Justice Department policy. With great persuasive force, the 19-page memo posits two contentions. First, based on what is publicly known, the special counsel’s theory of obstruction is legally flawed. Second, if a Justice Department investigation is going to be used to take down a democratically elected president, the social cohesion of our body politic demands that it be over a clear, very serious crime, not a novel and aggressive theory of prosecution.

There is no meritorious disagreement with either point.

It was entirely proper for Barr to weigh in on these questions in the thoughtful manner he chose. As a former attorney general, he directed his views to Rod Rosenstein and Steve Engel, respectively the deputy attorney general and the head of the OLC, the lawyers’ lawyers at the Justice Department. Barr was not only attorney general in the Bush 41 administration; he also served in the weighty positions that Rosenstein and Engel now occupy. He is intimately familiar with the difficult decisions they have to make and the Justice Department guidelines and processes that are in place to guide decision-making.

Barr wrote not as an advocate representing someone in the investigation, but as a former high-ranking government official concerned about the institutions of the executive branch, particularly the Justice Department. Special Counsel Mueller’s apparent obstruction theory may have been conceived with the specific facts of President Trump’s situation in mind — Trump’s expression of hope that the FBI would drop any investigation of Michael Flynn, his decision to fire FBI director James Comey. But while a prosecutor may believe his application of a legal principle is narrow, once that application becomes a precedent, only the limits of logic curtail its further, potentially paralyzing extension.

As Barr elaborates, if a president may be prosecuted for obstruction based on carrying out the executive’s constitutional prerogatives — exercises of prosecutorial discretion, giving direction to the course of an investigation, making personnel and management decisions — then every other official in the Justice Department is similarly vulnerable. The apprehension that proper and necessary acts could be construed as improperly motivated, and therefore as actionable obstruction, would profoundly undermine the administration of justice.

The suggestion that there was something untoward about Barr’s submission is absurd. That is why the ethics analysts at the Justice Department concluded that the memo raises no issues of disqualification or recusal in connection with Barr’s nomination to be attorney general. These are the same career lawyers who advised former attorney general Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the Russia investigation that Mueller is now conducting, much to the president’s chagrin and the applause of his critics.

William Barr Memo: Obstruction of Justice Explained, Not Ruled Out | National Review