The Very Worst Racist

[ogibillm]

Post #121- in your eye, you wind-bag.

Having slain most of the Democrat apologists, let's continue as we trample the weak and hurtle the dead!

Eric Holder was worse than Bull Connor, another Democrat who judge people based on the color of their skin, simply because Holder is in a more powerful position.




Here, insight into the racist thinking of Eric holder:

5. "For much of his life, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. carried around something peculiar…an old clipping of a quote from Harlem preacher Reverend Samuel D. Proctor. Holder put the clipping in his wallet in 1971, when he was studying history at Columbia University, and kept it in wallet after wallet over the ensuing decades. What were Proctor’s words that Holder found so compelling?

“Blackness is another issue entirely apart from class in America. No matter how affluent, educated and mobile [a black person] becomes, his race defines him more particularly than anything else.”…

When asked to explain the passage, Holder replied, “It really says that… I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States attorney. And he was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a common cause that bonds the black United States attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.”…It may seem shocking to hear these racialist views ascribed to America’s top law enforcement officer. But to people who have worked inside the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, these attitudes are perfectly familiar."
DOJ Whistleblower J. Christian Adams Releases New Book | Video | TheBlaze.com DOJ s Whistleblower in New Black Panther Case Releases Book Video TheBlaze.com




a. Has anyone asked Holder what exactly is the “common cause” that binds the black attorney general and the black criminal? More important, what should the black attorney general do about this common cause? Should the black criminal feel empathy for the black attorney general or more likely, do the favors only flow in one direction?

Holder’s explanation of Proctor’s quote offers some key insights into our attorney generals’ worldview. First, being “more particular” than anything else, skin color limits and defines Americans- in other words, race comes first for Holder.

Second, despite Americans’ widespread belief in trans-racial principles such as individual liberty and equal protection, blacks are expected to show solidarity with other blacks.

And third, black law enforcement officers are expected to show this solidarity toward their racial compatriots, including black criminals.”
J. Christian Adams, “Injustice: Exposing The Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department,” p. 2.


While one might quibble as to which Democrat is a worse racist.....Holder or Connor....

....it is clear that both found skin color the most important factor in interpreting the law.



If you voted for Obama....this is what you voted for.

I'll ignore the stupid reference to "Bull" who died in 1973 and has nothing...., even consciousness on the planet...to do with Holder other than both being Democrats.

Once again, cutting through your editorial bullshit, we find ONE QUOTE:

Holder replied, “It really says that… I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States attorney. And he was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a common cause that bonds the black United States attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person."​

You think the fact that he knew he was black was "the most important factor in interpreting the law."

In fact, you think it is "CLEAR."

Um, do you have one example during the past 6 years when Holder interpreted the law based primarily on his skin color?

the question that the op will avoid, because she will have no answer.

Post #121- in your eye, you wind-bag.

i'm going to give you 10 minutes to figure out what's wrong with your post 121, which points to a case against Ike Brown as proof that Holder is racist, before i point it out for you.

Now....is that any way to address your instructor?

last chance. what's wrong with post 121?

 

[paperview]

Let's have a listen to that "liberal" democrat, George Wallace :

"Never before in the history of this nation have so many human and property rights been destroyed by a single enactment of the Congress. It is an act of tyranny. It is the assassin's knife stuck in the back of liberty.

With this assassin's knife and a blackjack in the hand of the Federal force-cult, the left-wing liberals will try to force us back into bondage. Bondage to a tyranny more brutal than that imposed by the British monarchy which claimed power to rule over the lives of our forefathers under sanction of the Divine Right of kings.

Today, this tyranny is imposed by the central government which claims the right to rule over our lives under sanction of the omnipotent black-robed despots who sit on the bench of the United States Supreme Court.

...Yet there are those who call this a good bill. It is people like Senator Hubert Humphrey and other members of Americans for Democratic Action. It is people like Ralph McGill and other left-wing radical apologists.They called it a good bill before it was amended to restore the right to trial by jury in certain cases.

It was left-wing radicals who led the fight in the Senate for the so-called civil rights bill now about to enslave our nation
...
You and I know that that's extremely difficult to do where our newspapers are owned by out-of-state interests. Newspapers which are run and operated by left-wing liberals, Communist sympathizers, and members of the Americans for Democratic Action and other Communist front organizations with high sounding names.

However, we will not be intimidated by the vultures of the liberal left-wing press. We will not be deceived by their lies and distortions of truth. We will not be swayed by their brutal attacks upon the character and reputation of any honest citizen who dares stand up and fight for liberty.

LINK

There's more rich red-meat for your there, connies. You'd love it. That was his July 4th "patriotic" American speech, where he decries the Civil Rights Act.

The whole speech sounds like it was plucked straight from a Tea party rally, save a few words here or there.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is bewildering why this was even posted or brought up in the first place.
Obviously she cannot find anyone to bash today so this was the most convenient person.
Worst racist? Very very doubtful that this is true, but if it consoles her feeble mind so be it.
Some pictures of blacks being hanged by the KKK or others might prompt one to believe they were a bit more
in the "worst" category.
Then again, this is political chic. Get it!! LOL

"Some pictures of blacks being hanged by the KKK or others might prompt one to believe they were a bit more."

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…”
Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

 

[Samson]

Oh, look!

You're doing your "is not, is not" dance.

Lovely.

Look! You've managed another absurdly stupid post!

 

[Samson]

Post #121- in your eye, you wind-bag.

i'm going to give you 10 minutes to figure out what's wrong with your post 121, which points to a case against Ike Brown as proof that Holder is racist, before i point it out for you.

ya think?


If PC is to stupid to realize it whilst cut-in-pasting, its not gonna happen in 10 minutes.

 

[boilermaker55]

Still don't get it. So just go around with your hate.

It is bewildering why this was even posted or brought up in the first place.
Obviously she cannot find anyone to bash today so this was the most convenient person.
Worst racist? Very very doubtful that this is true, but if it consoles her feeble mind so be it.
Some pictures of blacks being hanged by the KKK or others might prompt one to believe they were a bit more
in the "worst" category.
Then again, this is political chic. Get it!! LOL

"Some pictures of blacks being hanged by the KKK or others might prompt one to believe they were a bit more."

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…”
Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

 

[paperview]

Oh, look!

You're doing your "is not, is not" dance.

Lovely.

Look! You've managed another absurdly stupid post!

It has to be deliberate stupidity. It has to be.

Some kind of performance art.

 

[Ravi]

Thanks for this thread Politicalchica...it was one of the greatest political magic tricks when the democrats convinced black Americans that the Republicans were the racists and the former slave holding, kkk, jim crow democrats were their best friend....

You, like your friend PC, always assume that black people are stupid. Black people, and any rational people, know that at one time the Democrats WERE racist and the Republicans were sane and had liberal live and let live views.

That WERE is key.

It's people like you that keep the Republicans looking like racists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Still don't get it. So just go around with your hate.

It is bewildering why this was even posted or brought up in the first place.
Obviously she cannot find anyone to bash today so this was the most convenient person.
Worst racist? Very very doubtful that this is true, but if it consoles her feeble mind so be it.
Some pictures of blacks being hanged by the KKK or others might prompt one to believe they were a bit more
in the "worst" category.
Then again, this is political chic. Get it!! LOL

"Some pictures of blacks being hanged by the KKK or others might prompt one to believe they were a bit more."

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…”
Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

Are you saying that I hate....or that 'Liberal historian Eric Foner' hates?

I know you're not allowed to say that the Democrat Party hates.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Thanks for this thread Politicalchica...it was one of the greatest political magic tricks when the democrats convinced black Americans that the Republicans were the racists and the former slave holding, kkk, jim crow democrats were their best friend....

You, like your friend PC, always assume that black people are stupid. Black people, and any rational people, know that at one time the Democrats WERE racist and the Republicans were sane and had liberal live and let live views.

That WERE is key.

It's people like you that keep the Republicans looking like racists.

"You, like your friend PC,...."

Aren't you and I pals, Ravi????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh, look!

You're doing your "is not, is not" dance.

Lovely.

Look! You've managed another absurdly stupid post!

Be sure to save that for the turtle pics you keep posting.

 

[paperview]

The full quote from Foner is:

“In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy.”

Those white supremacists, democrats and slaveholders were...conservatives, and boasted the title of conservatives - proudly.

Deal with it.

Jesus Christ are you dense.

 

[boilermaker55]

You said it!

Still don't get it. So just go around with your hate.

It is bewildering why this was even posted or brought up in the first place.
Obviously she cannot find anyone to bash today so this was the most convenient person.
Worst racist? Very very doubtful that this is true, but if it consoles her feeble mind so be it.
Some pictures of blacks being hanged by the KKK or others might prompt one to believe they were a bit more
in the "worst" category.
Then again, this is political chic. Get it!! LOL

"Some pictures of blacks being hanged by the KKK or others might prompt one to believe they were a bit more."

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…”
Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

Are you saying that I hate....or that 'Liberal historian Eric Foner' hates?

I know you're not allowed to say that the Democrat Party hates.....

 

[bendog]

I'm reasonably informed that the democrat party included, at one time, southern segregationists. I hadn't known that before. (-:

 

[boilermaker55]

Oh yes and christians all over the world during the crusades never plundered and raped and pillaged.
LOL

 

[ogibillm]

Post #121- in your eye, you wind-bag.

Having slain most of the Democrat apologists, let's continue as we trample the weak and hurtle the dead!

Eric Holder was worse than Bull Connor, another Democrat who judge people based on the color of their skin, simply because Holder is in a more powerful position.




Here, insight into the racist thinking of Eric holder:

5. "For much of his life, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. carried around something peculiar…an old clipping of a quote from Harlem preacher Reverend Samuel D. Proctor. Holder put the clipping in his wallet in 1971, when he was studying history at Columbia University, and kept it in wallet after wallet over the ensuing decades. What were Proctor’s words that Holder found so compelling?

“Blackness is another issue entirely apart from class in America. No matter how affluent, educated and mobile [a black person] becomes, his race defines him more particularly than anything else.”…

When asked to explain the passage, Holder replied, “It really says that… I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States attorney. And he was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a common cause that bonds the black United States attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.”…It may seem shocking to hear these racialist views ascribed to America’s top law enforcement officer. But to people who have worked inside the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, these attitudes are perfectly familiar."
DOJ Whistleblower J. Christian Adams Releases New Book | Video | TheBlaze.com DOJ s Whistleblower in New Black Panther Case Releases Book Video TheBlaze.com




a. Has anyone asked Holder what exactly is the “common cause” that binds the black attorney general and the black criminal? More important, what should the black attorney general do about this common cause? Should the black criminal feel empathy for the black attorney general or more likely, do the favors only flow in one direction?

Holder’s explanation of Proctor’s quote offers some key insights into our attorney generals’ worldview. First, being “more particular” than anything else, skin color limits and defines Americans- in other words, race comes first for Holder.

Second, despite Americans’ widespread belief in trans-racial principles such as individual liberty and equal protection, blacks are expected to show solidarity with other blacks.

And third, black law enforcement officers are expected to show this solidarity toward their racial compatriots, including black criminals.”
J. Christian Adams, “Injustice: Exposing The Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department,” p. 2.


While one might quibble as to which Democrat is a worse racist.....Holder or Connor....

....it is clear that both found skin color the most important factor in interpreting the law.



If you voted for Obama....this is what you voted for.

I'll ignore the stupid reference to "Bull" who died in 1973 and has nothing...., even consciousness on the planet...to do with Holder other than both being Democrats.

Once again, cutting through your editorial bullshit, we find ONE QUOTE:

Holder replied, “It really says that… I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States attorney. And he was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a common cause that bonds the black United States attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person."​

You think the fact that he knew he was black was "the most important factor in interpreting the law."

In fact, you think it is "CLEAR."

Um, do you have one example during the past 6 years when Holder interpreted the law based primarily on his skin color?

the question that the op will avoid, because she will have no answer.

Post #121- in your eye, you wind-bag.

i'm going to give you 10 minutes to figure out what's wrong with your post 121, which points to a case against Ike Brown as proof that Holder is racist, before i point it out for you.

Now....is that any way to address your instructor?

okay. you lose. i wanted to give you a chance to see what was wrong, but you failed.

7first, the ike brown case was brought about in 2005. the case was decided in 2007, appealed, and the appeal decided February 27, 2009. Additionally, Holder's Justice Department filed for an injuction to extend the provisions of the 2007 ruling by two years.

the important fact, though, is that at no time were charges brought by Holder's Justice Department, as you claimed public pressure made them. Nearly everything, except for the filing for an extension, happened before Holder took office.

So... care to try again?

 

[paperview]

Notice PC skipped right over my question asking if Bull Conner, Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond,George Wallace were conservative or liberal.

She also completely whooshed over the 1964 speech by Democrat George Wallace that reads like any right wing tea party speech of today

But lets look further -- mid to late 1950's, / 60's...Conservatives...

What were other prominent Conservatives saying?

Goldwater gave rise to the modern conservative movement, reinforced strongly by the one who is considered the father of that movement, William F. Buckley - and his organ which is still strong today: The National Review.

Roundaboutish that time, what was the National Review saying about the Civil Rights of blacks?

For a clue, we can look at Buckley's "Why the South Must Prevail."

 

[paperview]

I'll help...The National Review, the solid conservative journal at the time, headed by modern conservative leader William F. Buckley espoused... what?

Let's review:

During the Civil Rights Era, Buckley made a name for himself as a promoter of white supremacy. National Review, which he founded in 1955, championed violent racist regimes in the American South and South Africa.
A 1957 editorial written by Buckley, "Why the South Must Prevail" (National Review, 8/24/57), cited the "cultural superiority of white over Negro" in explaining why whites were "entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas where [they do] not predominate numerically."

Appearing on NPR's Fresh Air in 1989 (rebroadcast 2/28/08), he stood by the passage. "Well, I think that's absolutely correct," Buckley told host Terry Gross when she read it back to him.

A 1960 National Review editorial supported South Africa's white minority rule (4/23/60): "The whites are entitled, we believe, to preeminence in South Africa." In a 1961 National Review column about colonialism; which the magazine once called "that brilliantly conceived structure" (William F. Buckley, John Judis)--Buckley explained that "black Africans" left alone "tend to revert to savagery." The same year, in a speech to the group Young Americans for Freedom, Buckley called citizens of the Congo "semi-savages" (National Review, 9/9/61).


National Review editors condemned the 1963 bombing of a black Birmingham Church that killed four children, but because it "set back the cause of the white people there so dramatically," the editors wondered "whether in fact the explosion was the act of a provocateur";of a Communist, or of a crazed Negro" (Chicago Reader, 8/26/05).

Just months before the 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed, Buckley warned in his syndicated column (2/18/65) that "chaos" and "mobocratic rule" might follow if "the entire Negro population in the South were suddenly given the vote." In his 1969 column "On Negro Inferiority" (4/8/69), Buckley heralded as "massive" and "apparently authoritative" academic racist Arthur Jensen's findings that blacks are less intelligent than whites and Asians.
William F. Buckley, Rest in Praise ? FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting

William F. Buckley: Democrat or Republican?

 

[bendog]

Oh yes and christians all over the world during the crusades never plundered and raped and pillaged.
LOL

well, they may have raped and pillaged, but have not done so since they became republican Christians.

 

[paperview]

For bonus points...who was the man stumping for the 1964 Republican candidate during a very important Civil Rights year, --

the Republican presidential candidate who was against the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

Do you know?

The barnstorming speechifier made a pretty vaultworthy speech. It was called: "A Time for Choosing."

It would go in the vault, because that man went on to become the man the conservatives call St. Ronnie today.

Reagan not only opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, but the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

1964. It sure was

A Time for Choosing.