- Thread starter
- #121
"Um, do you have one example during the past 6 years when Holder interpreted the law based primarily on his skin color?"
Gee....you'd have to be a real idiot to have forgotten the Philadelphia voter intimidation case.......
But I kinda liked following the Ike Brown case, where Holder had to be dragged by the publicity into filing charges against a black official who discriminated against whites.....
...then, when the 5th Circuit.....
...well...you'll see:
Read this, they you can do your "is not, is not" dance.
6. In his book, "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department,"J. Christian Adams, bears witness to the racism with which Eric Holder has infused the Department of Justice.
"I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.
a. Every change in voting in Mississippi must be submitted for approval to the DOJ voting section — where I worked for five years — under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Section 5 gives the DOJ power to object to any change motivated by a discriminatory racial intent or with a discriminatory racial effect in nine states and portions of seven. Changes to the law in 2006 made it clear that any discrimination would suffice to trigger an objection under the act.
b. Right now, the Holder Justice Department has a submission from Ike Brown to allow him to do precisely the same thing he tried in 2003 — prevent people from voting based on their party loyalties [actually, their skin color].
The Department must decide this week if white victims are worth protecting, by imposing an objection to the same behavior a federal court has already ruled was motivated by an illegal racial intent. If the races were reversed in this submission, there is zero doubt the DOJ would object to the proposal…. there is an open and pervasive hostility within the DOJ towards using the voting laws to protect all races."
c. " Brown is unapologetic. He says some local white Democrats aren't "true" Democrats. "We support the black candidates because we're sure they're going to vote in the liberal interest," Brown said"
Reverse Racism - ABC News
7. When the courts heard the case, they pulled the rug out from under Holder's DoJ.....they found against Ike Brown.
Now, get this: ".... the Justice Department seems embarrassed about a recent judgment in its favor by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. U.S.v.Ike Brown is a major Voting Rights Act case involving intentional race-based discrimination by local officials in Noxubee County, Miss.
When the Fifth Circuit issued its decision on February 27, there was complete silence from Justice. The department typically issues a press release after any significant litigation victory, and the Civil Rights Division trumpets every success. But not here. The silence from the nation's leading news outlets was also deafening: Not a word was published about the case by theNew York Times, the Washington Post, or any other major publication. Why? Because the offensive conduct at issue did not conveniently track with the Left's view of race discrimination.
..... If the races had been reversed, does anyone doubt this would have been front-page news? Or that Eric Holder would have been prominently quoted in a Justice Department press release calling attention to this outrageous discrimination?"
A Leadership of Cowards Why is Eric Holder Embarrassed About Enforcing Civil Rights in Noxubee County
