HenryBHough
Diamond Member
I would teach people to fish.
Yeah.
And have Greenpeace all over you like flies over shit for molesting those finned friends and, worse, encouraging others to do it too.
Then all those friends will get busted for not having licenses.
But government is your friend and wants everyone to have plenty to eat. Provided, of course, it comes from a government handout and the recipient is properly respectful when next at a polling place.
Hi Henry
Since I meant figuratively not literally,
I will try to read your reply msg that way as well.
the equivalent of your objection would be
* opposition by people who want to control the issue of currency
or who oppose capitalism and money altogether and protest it on its face
* and support by people who want to control handouts for political favor.
1. for opposition by the federal govt or people who support federal reserve notes only
the notes are legal as long as you follow certain rules so there is no conflict with licensing
2. for people who opposing capitalism like you point out those who opposing killing fish
most of those people are okay with cooperative economics and self-managed labor
most do not see this form of money as exploiting or oppressive so they tend not to object
3. it takes TOO MUCH WORK to be any kind of handout for political favor
so even the people who support it have difficulty enacting it
Does this answer the same points that you were making
using the literal example of fishing and opposition by animal rights environmentalists
or pro government regulation by licensing?
Does it address the issue of govt handouts and political exploitation not applying?
If there is any political empowerment of one group over any other it is a definitely
a push for cooperative and sustainable economic development and independence
from either excessive govt or corporate control. So yes, you may see opposition from that.
Cute but, since it won't fit on a bumper strip, most of it will be ignored by 90% of those who start to read it.