Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're simply indiscriminately flooding the thread now. Not one link you have posted supports your earlier claim.
But do continue, I always enjoy making pukes like you jump through hoops!
Yes he is a well known troll. It's also well known he cannot stand up in the crucible of honest debate.You're simply indiscriminately flooding the thread now. Not one link you have posted supports your earlier claim.
But do continue, I always enjoy making pukes like you jump through hoops!
Well there you go...proof positive and true to form.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/95445-the-warmergate-scandal-42.html#post1765238
Yes he is a well known troll. It's also well known he cannot stand up in the crucible of honest debate.You're simply indiscriminately flooding the thread now. Not one link you have posted supports your earlier claim.
But do continue, I always enjoy making pukes like you jump through hoops!
Well there you go...proof positive and true to form.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/95445-the-warmergate-scandal-42.html#post1765238
Doesn't stop me from occasionally using him for a game of "kick the can" for as long as it amuses me!
Yes he is a well known troll. It's also well known he cannot stand up in the crucible of honest debate.Well there you go...proof positive and true to form.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/95445-the-warmergate-scandal-42.html#post1765238
Doesn't stop me from occasionally using him for a game of "kick the can" for as long as it amuses me!
Don't let your guard down, his tactics are simple but effective.
He wears you down with sheer stupidity, changes the subject 20 times, moves the goalposts all over the field, declares victory repeatedly then just when you think he has reached the limits of idiocy, he shows you his derangement knows know bounds.
Yes he is a well known troll. It's also well known he cannot stand up in the crucible of honest debate.
Doesn't stop me from occasionally using him for a game of "kick the can" for as long as it amuses me!
Don't let your guard down, his tactics are simple but effective.
He wears you down with sheer stupidity, changes the subject 20 times, moves the goalposts all over the field, declares victory repeatedly then just when you think he has reached the limits of idiocy, he shows you his derangement knows know bounds.
Did you even read the article? Probably not...
"The first generation of our technology should be capable of harnessing about 70% of the solar energy that hits the dish to produce electricity and thermal heat," says Faiman. With that type of efficiency, Zenith Solar says the cost of producing energy with its technology is close to that of conventional fuels.
At the Zenith of Solar Energy
When you show me where it's cost beneficial and truly carbon neutral, I'll stop laughing.The irony is that green energy can very easily be made at home.
Each of us could produce our own energy.
Then the big companies would be out of the loop.
However, cap and trade will artificially inflate everyone's utility bills, making "green" solutions for the home almost look viable!
Insulated homes....cost efficient and carbon neutral.
Solar panels...cost efficient and carbon neutral.
Small wind mills...cost efficient and carbon neutral.
When you show me where it's cost beneficial and truly carbon neutral, I'll stop laughing.
However, cap and trade will artificially inflate everyone's utility bills, making "green" solutions for the home almost look viable!
Insulated homes....cost efficient and carbon neutral.
Solar panels...cost efficient and carbon neutral.
Small wind mills...cost efficient and carbon neutral.
Not sure where you live, but here in Michigan all our homes are insulated.
Solar panels are not cost effective.
Small windmills are useless. They couldn't even power up your vibrator.
Don't let your guard down, his tactics are simple but effective.
He wears you down with sheer stupidity, changes the subject 20 times, moves the goalposts all over the field, declares victory repeatedly then just when you think he has reached the limits of idiocy, he shows you his derangement knows know bounds.
Did you even read the article? Probably not...
"The first generation of our technology should be capable of harnessing about 70% of the solar energy that hits the dish to produce electricity and thermal heat," says Faiman. With that type of efficiency, Zenith Solar says the cost of producing energy with its technology is close to that of conventional fuels.
At the Zenith of Solar Energy
*exasperated*
The debate was cost effective home sized solar power.
From your linkThe price tag for a home-size unit is likely to be less than $20,000.That means 17 year return of your initial investment.
And that's if nothing breaks or wears out (fat chance).
In other word, NOT COST EFFECTIVE!!!
.
.
.
.
That is my one contribution to your delusional pipe dream assertions.
Your lunacy is only surpassed by your dishonesty.
Bret Stephens: Climategate: Follow the Money - WSJ.com
Last year, ExxonMobil donated $7 million to a grab-bag of public policy institutes, including the Aspen Institute, the Asia Society and Transparency International. It also gave a combined $125,000 to the Heritage Institute and the National Center for Policy Analysis, two conservative think tanks that have offered dissenting views on what until recently was called—without irony—the climate change "consensus."
To read some of the press accounts of these gifts—amounting to about 0.0027% of Exxon's 2008 profits of $45 billion—you might think you'd hit upon the scandal of the age. But thanks to what now goes by the name of climategate, it turns out the real scandal lies elsewhere.
Climategate, as readers of these pages know, concerns some of the world's leading climate scientists working in tandem to block freedom of information requests, blackball dissenting scientists, manipulate the peer-review process, and obscure, destroy or massage inconvenient temperature data—facts that were laid bare by last week's disclosure of thousands of emails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, or CRU.
But the deeper question is why the scientists behaved this way to begin with, especially since the science behind man-made global warming is said to be firmly settled. To answer the question, it helps to turn the alarmists' follow-the-money methods right back at them.
Consider the case of Phil Jones, the director of the CRU and the man at the heart of climategate. According to one of the documents hacked from his center, between 2000 and 2006 Mr. Jones was the recipient (or co-recipient) of some $19 million worth of research grants, a sixfold increase over what he'd been awarded in the 1990s.
Climategate is real, its a fraud and put over on the first world countries by Al and his pals. China, Asia and Russia don't agree and are laughing their heads off at us. When has warm been bad? Its the cold and 2 miles of ice that covered much of Europe, Canada and the USA that was a deterent. Glad the truth has come out and glad that neither the weather or the climate furfilled the scam.
I tend to avoid reading fraudulent reports.Do you read at all?
I tend to avoid reading fraudulent reports.Do you read at all?
Back to topic:
Climategate: Follow the Money
Sure. "Watts Up With THat" tells the whole story. We have prospered during warming periods and not during cold periods like even the Little Ice Age. Siberia, Canada, our own North, Greenland and Iceland would love to increase their temperature by a few degrees but if its just 1 degree, they will like that too. Glaciers come and go. Its a natural cycle. The Medial Warm Period was lots warmer and folks loved it, grew grain and multiplied. The 2 Mile covering of Ice over the land was not good and nothing flurished. Who cares if the North Pole is melting? Which it is not. Polar Bears have increased to 25,000 and the Polar Bear folks say "There are a lot more bears, not a few but lots". CO2 is good and helps us flurish. A short history of the time of humans demostrates that warm is good and cold is bad.Climategate is real, its a fraud and put over on the first world countries by Al and his pals. China, Asia and Russia don't agree and are laughing their heads off at us. When has warm been bad? Its the cold and 2 miles of ice that covered much of Europe, Canada and the USA that was a deterent. Glad the truth has come out and glad that neither the weather or the climate furfilled the scam.
No, the only thing that is real is that we have doubled the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere in the last 200 years, and the earth is warming.
The arctic ice is melting and so are the glaciers. Glacier National Park is down to 27 glaciers from a high of 150. The North Pole is melting.
Atmospheric CO2 is at the highest level ever recorded, and the Antarctic ice core record goes back 600,000 years.
Ocean temperatures are at the highest level ever recorded.
Do you read at all?
No, you tend to avoid reading the truth.
That is why you are ignorant.
