Theory on why Biden won't answer the court packing question.

[Penelope]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

Yes, they do and in 2022 what do you think will happen if Democrats attempt to pack the courts?

They will lose the House for sure and sooner or later the Senate again, and then when the next Republican President is seated and has the Senate and House the court will be expanded again and those like you will forget your political party stupidity and scream it is unfair...

Truthfully McConnell should have waited until after the Election but he did not but if your side pact the court then understand what I wrote above will happen and then you will be crying once again...

 

[Norman]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

You still haven't accepted President Trump and his supreme court appointments.

Civil war is a consequence of the court packing move.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Could it be that he knows its a bad idea but he is afraid if he is HONEST about it he will lose a lot of his radical base?

Or do you believe he intends to do it but doesn't want to be HONEST out of fear of losing moderate voters?

Amazing how the left create then fall into their own traps.

McConnel made up the rule they would use nuclear action on Supreme Courts Justices,

It depends on Congress.

Harry changed the rules lol

You seem particularly triggered by this thread passing out negs like candy on Halloween as well as being incredibly uninformed.

 

[Moonglow]

Could it be that he knows its a bad idea but he is afraid if he is HONEST about it he will lose a lot of his radical base?

Or do you believe he intends to do it but doesn't want to be HONEST out of fear of losing moderate voters?

Amazing how the left create then fall into their own traps.

It is hard to answer unless one knows they will have a majority support from Congress and it ain't there right now.

 

[Moonglow]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

You still haven't accepted President Trump and his supreme court appointments.

Civil war is a consequence of the court packing move.

It never caused a civil war before when the SC was increased in number of appointees. The same for when it was reduced.

 

[Norman]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

You still haven't accepted President Trump and his supreme court appointments.

Civil war is a consequence of the court packing move.

It never caused a civil war before when the SC was increased in number of appointees. The same for when it was reduced.

Care to elucidate when that last happened?

 

[Devils_Advocate]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

You still haven't accepted President Trump and his supreme court appointments.

Civil war is a consequence of the court packing move.

It never caused a civil war before when the SC was increased in number of appointees. The same for when it was reduced.

Seeing it was reduced during Johnson ( 1860’s ) time and increased back to it normal when Grant was President mean it was truly reduced and then fixed after a Impeached President left office...

But please increase the court number and when a Republican does it, well no crying please!

 

[Moonglow]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

You still haven't accepted President Trump and his supreme court appointments.

Civil war is a consequence of the court packing move.

It never caused a civil war before when the SC was increased in number of appointees. The same for when it was reduced.

Seeing it was reduced during Johnson ( 1860’s ) time and increased back to it normal when Grant was President mean it was truly reduced and then fixed after a Impeached President left office...

But please increase the court number and when a Republican does it, well no crying please!

Frankly, I don't give a damn because the establishment will play ball with the elites, no matter that the SC said that illegal asset forfeiture is wrong the cops are still doing it..So it makes no difference what they say or do.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

You still haven't accepted President Trump and his supreme court appointments.

Civil war is a consequence of the court packing move.

It never caused a civil war before when the SC was increased in number of appointees. The same for when it was reduced.

Seeing it was reduced during Johnson ( 1860’s ) time and increased back to it normal when Grant was President mean it was truly reduced and then fixed after a Impeached President left office...

But please increase the court number and when a Republican does it, well no crying please!

Frankly, I don't give a damn because the establishment will play ball with the elites, no matter that the SC said that illegal asset forfeiture is wrong the cops are still doing it..So it makes no difference what they say or do.

Well unfortunately you must care a little or you would not be commenting back to me about the decrease and increase of the court while leaving out why it was reduced in the first place and why it was corrected after Grant became President....

 

[Moonglow]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

You still haven't accepted President Trump and his supreme court appointments.

Civil war is a consequence of the court packing move.

It never caused a civil war before when the SC was increased in number of appointees. The same for when it was reduced.

Seeing it was reduced during Johnson ( 1860’s ) time and increased back to it normal when Grant was President mean it was truly reduced and then fixed after a Impeached President left office...

But please increase the court number and when a Republican does it, well no crying please!

Frankly, I don't give a damn because the establishment will play ball with the elites, no matter that the SC said that illegal asset forfeiture is wrong the cops are still doing it..So it makes no difference what they say or do.

Well unfortunately you must care a little or you would not be commenting back to me about the decrease and increase of the court while leaving out why it was reduced in the first place and why it was corrected after Grant became President....

It made absolutely no difference when it was done.

 

[22lcidw]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

Packing the court is a lot more serious. Not answering it is an admission that it will be done.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

WTF are you saying?
What campaign promise? Joe won't commit either way.

It depends on Congress.

It depends on if possible President Harris will request the expansion of the court and then you have to go by what is required to expand the court and if Harris and Democrats have the votes to get it done...

Like Statehood for D.C. and P.R. the expansion of the court is not happening and just pure nonsense to get the base to vote!

Elections have consequences.

You still haven't accepted President Trump and his supreme court appointments.

Civil war is a consequence of the court packing move.

It never caused a civil war before when the SC was increased in number of appointees. The same for when it was reduced.

Seeing it was reduced during Johnson ( 1860’s ) time and increased back to it normal when Grant was President mean it was truly reduced and then fixed after a Impeached President left office...

But please increase the court number and when a Republican does it, well no crying please!

Frankly, I don't give a damn because the establishment will play ball with the elites, no matter that the SC said that illegal asset forfeiture is wrong the cops are still doing it..So it makes no difference what they say or do.

Well unfortunately you must care a little or you would not be commenting back to me about the decrease and increase of the court while leaving out why it was reduced in the first place and why it was corrected after Grant became President....

It made absolutely no difference when it was done.

Actually does and when it was done and the reason why does matter...

Sorry, but as Penelope stated elections have consequences and if Harris does become President and increases the court to pack them with Congress approval just remember sooner or later a Republican will do the same...

 

[pknopp]

It isn't going to happen. Packing the court is the same kind of campaign promise as Trump making Mexico pay for the wall or arresting Hillary.

Packing the court is a lot more serious. Not answering it is an admission that it will be done.

Well granted Trump wasn't serious.