There are not that many genuine liberals left

[White 6]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

I hold him responsible for inciting his followers with unproven attacks, using false statements that he convinced the weak minded were true, without proof in any court, any legislature, in the country, in an effort to overthrow a free election and it's result of him no longer being president. He should have never called them to Washington for a rally on that day, should never have participated with his lawyer and son on that stage whipping up the crowd. It was wrong, anti-American values, anit- free elections and contrary to the constitution, he swore to uphold and defend.

Oh bullshit. The President never said a word about calling for violence.

You have never led people. I have, and know better and use better judgement. Have also stood up to a angry crowd that was going to go violent, while I had MPs on the way, yet not arrived. No fun, My job was to exert control, so I did and prevented their mob movement to their intended targets. It was the president's job not to rile them up and certainly not to send the mob to the capital. Moving cattle stampede. He grossly failed in a way he is not allowed to by freedom of speech or expression in a leadership position. Fk him.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

 

[White 6]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

I hold him responsible for inciting his followers with unproven attacks, using false statements that he convinced the weak minded were true, without proof in any court, any legislature, in the country, in an effort to overthrow a free election and it's result of him no longer being president. He should have never called them to Washington for a rally on that day, should never have participated with his lawyer and son on that stage whipping up the crowd. It was wrong, anti-American values, anit- free elections and contrary to the constitution, he swore to uphold and defend.

You have absolutely no credibility. When you are asked for evidence to back up your claim and you respond with a laughing icon, you're done here.

Well put me on ignore. I don't mind. I responded to you time after time with more than icons, even inviting you to pull my posts to see if they supported your absurd statements, but you didn't. I hve listened to you baseless accusation and name calling when you lost the battle of ideas. You are all talk. You go nothing. No way to justify trump and his supporters regarding the attack on our capital and you know it.

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

I hold him responsible for inciting his followers with unproven attacks, using false statements that he convinced the weak minded were true, without proof in any court, any legislature, in the country, in an effort to overthrow a free election and it's result of him no longer being president. He should have never called them to Washington for a rally on that day, should never have participated with his lawyer and son on that stage whipping up the crowd. It was wrong, anti-American values, anit- free elections and contrary to the constitution, he swore to uphold and defend.

Oh bullshit. The President never said a word about calling for violence.

You have never led people. I have, and know better and use better judgement. Have also stood up to a angry crowd that was going to go violent, while I had MPs on the way, yet not arrived. No fun, My job was to exert control, so I did and prevented their mob movement to their intended targets. It was the president's job not to rile them up and certainly not to send the mob to the capital. Moving cattle stampede. He grossly failed in a way he is not allowed to by freedom of speech or expression in a leadership position. Fk him.

You don't know me or what I've done. You're so full of shit.

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

 

[White 6]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

I hold him responsible for inciting his followers with unproven attacks, using false statements that he convinced the weak minded were true, without proof in any court, any legislature, in the country, in an effort to overthrow a free election and it's result of him no longer being president. He should have never called them to Washington for a rally on that day, should never have participated with his lawyer and son on that stage whipping up the crowd. It was wrong, anti-American values, anit- free elections and contrary to the constitution, he swore to uphold and defend.

Oh bullshit. The President never said a word about calling for violence.

You have never led people. I have, and know better and use better judgement. Have also stood up to a angry crowd that was going to go violent, while I had MPs on the way, yet not arrived. No fun, My job was to exert control, so I did and prevented their mob movement to their intended targets. It was the president's job not to rile them up and certainly not to send the mob to the capital. Moving cattle stampede. He grossly failed in a way he is not allowed to by freedom of speech or expression in a leadership position. Fk him.

You don't know me or what I've done. You're so full of shit.

Does not seem likely you have led people, because you show no signs of being trained in leadership or understanding people or crowd dynamics. Leading a meeting at the plant, ain't the same thing.

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

I hold him responsible for inciting his followers with unproven attacks, using false statements that he convinced the weak minded were true, without proof in any court, any legislature, in the country, in an effort to overthrow a free election and it's result of him no longer being president. He should have never called them to Washington for a rally on that day, should never have participated with his lawyer and son on that stage whipping up the crowd. It was wrong, anti-American values, anit- free elections and contrary to the constitution, he swore to uphold and defend.

You have absolutely no credibility. When you are asked for evidence to back up your claim and you respond with a laughing icon, you're done here.

Well put me on ignore. I don't mind. I responded to you time after time with more than icons, even inviting you to pull my posts to see if they supported your absurd statements, but you didn't. I hve listened to you baseless accusation and name calling when you lost the battle of ideas. You are all talk. You go nothing. No way to justify trump and his supporters regarding the attack on our capital and you know it.

You have no credibility. You claim Trump incited violence, yet you haven't shown us how. Loser.

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

I hold him responsible for inciting his followers with unproven attacks, using false statements that he convinced the weak minded were true, without proof in any court, any legislature, in the country, in an effort to overthrow a free election and it's result of him no longer being president. He should have never called them to Washington for a rally on that day, should never have participated with his lawyer and son on that stage whipping up the crowd. It was wrong, anti-American values, anit- free elections and contrary to the constitution, he swore to uphold and defend.

Oh bullshit. The President never said a word about calling for violence.

You have never led people. I have, and know better and use better judgement. Have also stood up to a angry crowd that was going to go violent, while I had MPs on the way, yet not arrived. No fun, My job was to exert control, so I did and prevented their mob movement to their intended targets. It was the president's job not to rile them up and certainly not to send the mob to the capital. Moving cattle stampede. He grossly failed in a way he is not allowed to by freedom of speech or expression in a leadership position. Fk him.

You don't know me or what I've done. You're so full of shit.

Does not seem likely you have led people, because you show no signs of being trained in leadership or understanding people or crowd dynamics. Leading a meeting at the plant, ain't the same thing.

You're a fucking joke.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

 

[White 6]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

I hold him responsible for inciting his followers with unproven attacks, using false statements that he convinced the weak minded were true, without proof in any court, any legislature, in the country, in an effort to overthrow a free election and it's result of him no longer being president. He should have never called them to Washington for a rally on that day, should never have participated with his lawyer and son on that stage whipping up the crowd. It was wrong, anti-American values, anit- free elections and contrary to the constitution, he swore to uphold and defend.

You have absolutely no credibility. When you are asked for evidence to back up your claim and you respond with a laughing icon, you're done here.

Well put me on ignore. I don't mind. I responded to you time after time with more than icons, even inviting you to pull my posts to see if they supported your absurd statements, but you didn't. I hve listened to you baseless accusation and name calling when you lost the battle of ideas. You are all talk. You go nothing. No way to justify trump and his supporters regarding the attack on our capital and you know it.

You have no credibility. You claim Trump incited violence, yet you haven't shown us how. Loser.

You lost. Lost the election, lost the recounts, lost in the courts, lost in the state election commissions, lost in the state legislatures, and after the insurrection, lost in the Senate, and all the way through, trump and his legal team lost every effort while screaming fraud, fraud, fraud, stolen election, stolen election, stolen election, stop the steal, stop the steal, stop the steal. don't let them get away with it, you got to fight, fight, fight to make your voices heard. Yeah, rah, rah, sis boom bah to rally the spirit, only this time it incited insurrection against the country he was president of. He is responsible and it is totally indefensible except to those that bought into team trump lies over the last two month. Low character and bad leadership are a dangerous combination, indeed.
Oh yah, you lost holding up your side on the message board in this thread. You lose, again.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

Hypocritical shithead.

 

[White 6]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

Hypocritical shithead.

There you go again. When you lose it all and are reduced to name calling on the playground. You lose again.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

Hypocritical shithead.

Hypocritical how? You are looking for equivalency here. Everyone has already denounced the violence and property damage caused by the social justice protests devolving. Almost everyone who attended these protests weren't there to cause mayhem. Each time that is pointed out to you..back to the same lines you traipse. They aren't the same. The people who overran the Capitol weren't there to protest social justice. They were there at the behest of their leader to strongarm (by whatever means) politicians into throwing out the slate of electors and re-installing Donald Trump as President for another four years. A coup. Period. Not a slow coup. Not a soft coup. Not an ongoing soft, slow coup. Not a chicken coup. Sedition. Treason. Why? Because their man lost. And he's spent the last two months convincing the pliant lemmings that it was "stolen" from them. When it wasn't.

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

Hypocritical shithead.

Hypocritical how? You are looking for equivalency here. Everyone has already denounced the violence and property damage caused by the social justice protests devolving. Almost everyone who attended these protests weren't there to cause mayhem. Each time that is pointed out to you..back to the same lines you traipse. They aren't the same. The people who overran the Capitol weren't there to protest social justice. They were there at the behest of their leader to strongarm (by whatever means) politicians into throwing out the slate of electors and re-installing Donald Trump as President for another four years. A coup. Period. Not a slow coup. Not a soft coup. Not an ongoing soft, slow coup. Not a chicken coup. Sedition. Treason. Why? Because their man lost. And he's spent the last two months convincing the pliant lemmings that it was "stolen" from them. When it wasn't.

And blm and antifa violence was about overturning the 2016 election. Looks like we're in a civil war, huh.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

Hypocritical shithead.

Hypocritical how? You are looking for equivalency here. Everyone has already denounced the violence and property damage caused by the social justice protests devolving. Almost everyone who attended these protests weren't there to cause mayhem. Each time that is pointed out to you..back to the same lines you traipse. They aren't the same. The people who overran the Capitol weren't there to protest social justice. They were there at the behest of their leader to strongarm (by whatever means) politicians into throwing out the slate of electors and re-installing Donald Trump as President for another four years. A coup. Period. Not a slow coup. Not a soft coup. Not an ongoing soft, slow coup. Not a chicken coup. Sedition. Treason. Why? Because their man lost. And he's spent the last two months convincing the pliant lemmings that it was "stolen" from them. When it wasn't.

And blm and antifa violence was about overturning the 2016 election. Looks like we're in a civil war, huh.

No it wasn't. And no. Your civil war will not be televised. I predict it will not end well for your side.

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

Hypocritical shithead.

Hypocritical how? You are looking for equivalency here. Everyone has already denounced the violence and property damage caused by the social justice protests devolving. Almost everyone who attended these protests weren't there to cause mayhem. Each time that is pointed out to you..back to the same lines you traipse. They aren't the same. The people who overran the Capitol weren't there to protest social justice. They were there at the behest of their leader to strongarm (by whatever means) politicians into throwing out the slate of electors and re-installing Donald Trump as President for another four years. A coup. Period. Not a slow coup. Not a soft coup. Not an ongoing soft, slow coup. Not a chicken coup. Sedition. Treason. Why? Because their man lost. And he's spent the last two months convincing the pliant lemmings that it was "stolen" from them. When it wasn't.

And blm and antifa violence was about overturning the 2016 election. Looks like we're in a civil war, huh.

No it wasn't. And no. Your civil war will not be televised. I predict it will not end well for your side.

BOO

 

[BS Filter]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

Hypocritical shithead.

There you go again. When you lose it all and are reduced to name calling on the playground. You lose again.

You're stupid.

Pelosi praises National Guard presence in DC after resisting troops during BLM riots

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appears to have changed her tune when it comes to protecting the nation's capital.

www.foxnews.com

 

[White 6]

The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker

they started fade in the 1980's.

Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.

Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.

You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.

There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.

Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.

Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.

I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.

Who is a fascist extremist Republican?

Since fascist is defined as:
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.

That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.

But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.

Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.

Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.

Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.

No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.

You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.

Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.

You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.

Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.

Why do you support this?

When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?

Why do you support violence?

Who said I did?

Do you condemn blm and antifa?

On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?

For their violence.

I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?

Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.

Sure. You run with that. After talking up a "big event" for weeks on social media, your hero stands at the eilipse and proceeds to throw a match in a pool of gasoline. Then instead of walking with them, he retreats to White House to watch the world burn.
"And after this, we're going to walk down there, and I'll be there with you, we're going to walk down ... to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump told the crowd. "And we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

What did you think was going to happen? Trump never says anything directly. It's implied. People who've been around him and worked around him confirm this.

Show us exactly where the President called for violence.

Explained this to you already. It's implied. I saw his speech just before things went sideways and I knew it was going to be bad.
That's what Trump does. Even Cohen admitted that's how Trump got people to do things for him.
Sorry, no rationalizing your way out of this one.

Okay, show us exactly where it's implied.

"Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

If you watched the speech you would know at this point, the crowd was thundering. They were just itching to get on their way and have at it.
Look, I get it, you're going to constantly deflect and run over the same point time after time. There is no debate here. He sent the crowd on
its way hoping for exactly what happened. Why do you think he wasn't down at the Capitol with them? He wanted to see the fruits of his speech.
By all accounts, he was pleased with himself. Sorry, this insurrection..is all on him.

Not one word of violence. I've seen numerous Democrats give speeches saying they're gonna fight. Obama said "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun". Go fuck yourself.

I accept your surrender.
Gotta give you credit, you're a true believer.
Everyone, even Fox admits Trump incited the crowd.
You do know Obama was on the campaign trail in Philly when he said that..right?
What has your hero said on the campaign trail? Lots. Mostly because he never stopped campaigning.

Hypocritical shithead.

There you go again. When you lose it all and are reduced to name calling on the playground. You lose again.

You're stupid.

Pelosi praises National Guard presence in DC after resisting troops during BLM riots

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appears to have changed her tune when it comes to protecting the nation's capital.

www.foxnews.com

Are you still around? Everybody and his brother beat you like a rented mule, when you touch your keyboard and you have returned for more. There is something sick and pitiful about that. You should talk to somebody you trust, if there is anybody you trust. Maybe connected to why you cannot let go of the trump fetish, also.