There Are ZERO Children In Poverty

[Independentthinker]

I keep on hearing the left constantly saying that children are in poverty and we need to do this and that to lift them out of poverty. A bill is passing through Congress right now which the left claim will lift millions of children out of poverty.

BUT, the fact is, there are actually ZERO children in poverty. Let's define children as anyone younger than 18 and I challenge the left to show proof through financial records of children less than 18 that they are in poverty. Children under 18 have no financial records, nor do they have a financial net worth. In pretty much every single case there is, if they have any income from working jobs they also have zero debts, which gives them a positive net worth because children under 18 can't owe debts. So, assuming that most of these children don't work, they still have no debts and can't possibly be in poverty. They are children.

Now their parents, that's a different story. You can argue that we need to lift the deadbeat parents out of poverty, but children themselves cannot be in poverty. So, when the left claim that this and that will lift children out of poverty they are actually lying because it is lifting deadbeat parents out of poverty, not children.

 

[1srelluc]

Most are fat as butterballs....Or at least the one's whose parent is paying for groceries with EBT.

Hungry kids 1931.

 

[JGalt]

Most are fat as butterballs....Or at least the one's whose parent is paying for groceries with EBT.

Hungry kids 1931.

Hungry kid 2024.

 

[1srelluc]

Obesity and single parents seems to be the biggest problem with "needy" kids these days.

Most malnurished kids of the depression years had worms and other manner of parasites feeding on them.

 

[Moonglow]

Most are fat as butterballs....Or at least the one's whose parent is paying for groceries with EBT.

Hungry kids 1931.

are you bragging about poverty?

 

[Moonglow]

Obesity and single parents seems to be the biggest problem with "needy" kids these days.

Most malnurished kids of the depression years had worms and other manner of parasites feeding on them.

Which is what the US is trying to avoid with poor kids now.

 

[Hellbilly]

I keep on hearing the left constantly saying that children are in poverty and we need to do this and that to lift them out of poverty. A bill is passing through Congress right now which the left claim will lift millions of children out of poverty.

BUT, the fact is, there are actually ZERO children in poverty. Let's define children as anyone younger than 18 and I challenge the left to show proof through financial records of children less than 18 that they are in poverty. Children under 18 have no financial records, nor do they have a financial net worth. In pretty much every single case there is, if they have any income from working jobs they also have zero debts, which gives them a positive net worth because children under 18 can't owe debts. So, assuming that most of these children don't work, they still have no debts and can't possibly be in poverty. They are children.

Now their parents, that's a different story. You can argue that we need to lift the deadbeat parents out of poverty, but children themselves cannot be in poverty. So, when the left claim that this and that will lift children out of poverty they are actually lying because it is lifting deadbeat parents out of poverty, not children.

You are insane

 

[elektra]

Which is what the US is trying to avoid with poor kids now.

This is very sad, our Democrat president is a life long politician. Always one of the most powerful men in the world. Yet, the Democrat president has done nothing to end poverty in the USA. Even after 3 years as the most powerful man in the world, the Democrat president has done nothing but made poverty worst.

Democrats have no place in this world.

 

[Mac1958]

You are insane

If they deny it, it ceases to exist in their world.

That goes for many things.

 

[okfine]

Most are fat as butterballs....Or at least the one's whose parent is paying for groceries with EBT.

Hungry kids 1931.

Why are 70% of adults in Virginia obese?

 

[Independentthinker]

You are insane

You are insane

 

[Moonglow]

This is very sad, our Democrat president is a life long politician. Always one of the most powerful men in the world. Yet, the Democrat president has done nothing to end poverty in the USA. Even after 3 years as the most powerful man in the world, the Democrat president has done nothing but made poverty worst.

Democrats have no place in this world.

The democrats the republicans and God himself can't stop poverty for the different reasons it happens...As Christ said;

Matthew 26:11 The poor you will always have with you, but ...​

Bible Hub
https://biblehub.com › matthew



For there will never cease to be poor in the land; that is why I am commanding you to open wide your hand to your brother and to the poor and needy in your land ...

 

[Moonglow]

Why are 70% of adults in Virginia obese?

Ever hear of growth hormones in animals?

 

[Hellbilly]

You are insane

Clever comeback. If you think there are no children in poverty, take a drive through Pine Ridge

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If a child is malnourished it's strictly on the parent or parents.

Just waaaay too many sources otherwise

 

[okfine]

Ever hear of growth hormones in animals?

According to the OPoster it's because they are "needy"

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I keep on hearing the left constantly saying that children are in poverty and we need to do this and that to lift them out of poverty.

Is that why the bill passed 350-70 in the house? Only 70 Republicans in the house?

Your thread is garbage.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

I keep on hearing the left constantly saying that children are in poverty and we need to do this and that to lift them out of poverty. A bill is passing through Congress right now which the left claim will lift millions of children out of poverty.

BUT, the fact is, there are actually ZERO children in poverty. Let's define children as anyone younger than 18 and I challenge the left to show proof through financial records of children less than 18 that they are in poverty. Children under 18 have no financial records, nor do they have a financial net worth. In pretty much every single case there is, if they have any income from working jobs they also have zero debts, which gives them a positive net worth because children under 18 can't owe debts. So, assuming that most of these children don't work, they still have no debts and can't possibly be in poverty. They are children.

Now their parents, that's a different story. You can argue that we need to lift the deadbeat parents out of poverty, but children themselves cannot be in poverty. So, when the left claim that this and that will lift children out of poverty they are actually lying because it is lifting deadbeat parents out of poverty, not children.

The above..is incredibly stupid..breathtakingly so, in fact. Kudos for sinking to new depths of ignorance. Children can and do live in poverty. That the situation is out of their control simply adds to the tragedy.
Unless, of course, this is satire! In that case, very good job indeed~

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Why are 70% of adults in Virginia obese?

Mountain Dew and McDonalds---paid for with their SSI checks~

 

[Lesh]

If they deny it, it ceases to exist in their world.

That goes for many things.

This is one of the lamest, dumbest threads ever begin here.

Way to go OP

Stupid fuck