There is no proof that antibodies prevent covid

#32: wrong, they have more than clues, they have data that shows how long antibodies circulate in every patient, which database will also be growing as it addresses the diversity of genomic responses.

#33: wrong, there are numerous reasons to believe in this coronavirus vaccine. We have already today shown on another thread, for example, the analysis of mutations from New York and California, postulating that 'may not mount sufficient levels of neutralizing antibodies' in their secondary infections. We're mustard, ketchup.
 


A recent small French study , not yet reviewed by experts, found that six out of eight family members in close contact with relatives who had COVID-19 developed a T cell response, but did not test positive for antibodies.

A Swedish study of 200 people found a strong T cell response in most individuals who had mild illness or no symptoms following coronavirus infection, regardless of whether they showed an antibody response. The finding suggests that coronavirus infection rates may be higher than what has been studied using antibody tests alone, the researchers said.



Having anti bodies is not enough........as they are finding............the T cells kill the virus.
 
CNN- Bruce Golding? You almost gotta laugh when mostly lefties embrace the unproved theory of man-made global warming but they are skeptical about the immune response to a Covid vaccine.
 
The new Moderna covid vaccine produces antibodies in everyone tested, but what they fail to disclose is that everyone who has had covid has these antibodies and there is no evidence that the antibodies prevent a person from reacquiring covid. Furthermore the test rats moronic humans have not been exposed to the virus.

Why do they hide these things

They take antibodies from those who has recovered naturally from the virus.


 

Forum List

Back
Top