Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is STILL no State that seeks to ban contraceptives.
Yeah. It's obvious.
Yeah. It undercuts the current liberal Democrat Parody talking pointless.
But yeah. It's still true.
Rick Santorum: States Should Have Power To Ban Birth Control, SodomyRepublican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, whose strong base of evangelical Christian supporters has thrust him into contention in Iowa, said on Monday that he believes states should have the right to outlaw birth control and sodomy without the interference of the Supreme Court.
In an interview with Jake Tapper on ABC News, Santorum reiterated his opposition to the Supreme Courts 1965 ruling that prevented Connecticut from banning contraception.
The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that," he said. "It is not a constitutional right. The state has the right to pass whatever statutes they have. That's the thing I have said about the activism of the Supreme Court--they are creating rights, and it should be left up to the people to decide."
It doesn't matter--we have a GOP candidate in Rick Santorum that is continually stating the the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong in it's 1965 decision to slap down the Connecticut statute that did ban contraceptives.
It doesn't matter--we have a GOP candidate in Rick Santorum that is continually stating the the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong in it's 1965 decision to slap down the Connecticut statute that did ban contraceptives.
This.
"Conservatives" talk a lot about being small government. How any of them can support a guy who thinks married couples should not be allowed to plan when they have kids is beyond me.
How any liberal idiot can support the incumbent who daily tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say is beyond all reasonable people.
Part of the reason that states aren't trying to ban contraceptives is because such an act would be blatantly counter to constitutional jurisprudence. However, that hasn't stopped states entirely. States (and the federal government, for that matter) try to limit access to certain contraceptives in any number of ways. Perhaps most prominent is Mississippi's recent unsuccessful "personhood" amendment, which may have banned (had it been successful) methods of contraception which prevent fertilized eggs from entering the womb.
It doesn't matter--we have a GOP candidate in Rick Santorum that is continually stating the the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong in it's 1965 decision to slap down the Connecticut statute that did ban contraceptives.
This.
"Conservatives" talk a lot about being small government. How any of them can support a guy who thinks married couples should not be allowed to plan when they have kids is beyond me.
How any liberal idiot can support the incumbent who daily tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say is beyond all reasonable people.
This.
"Conservatives" talk a lot about being small government. How any of them can support a guy who thinks married couples should not be allowed to plan when they have kids is beyond me.
How any liberal idiot can support the incumbent who daily tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say is beyond all reasonable people.
See, the thing is about that, you can't point to one single thing Obama has done or said that "tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say".
Whereas with Santorum, he can't shut up about how few rights he thinks women have!
This.
"Conservatives" talk a lot about being small government. How any of them can support a guy who thinks married couples should not be allowed to plan when they have kids is beyond me.
How any liberal idiot can support the incumbent who daily tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say is beyond all reasonable people.
See, the thing is about that, you can't point to one single thing Obama has done or said that "tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say".
Whereas with Santorum, he can't shut up about how few rights he thinks women have!
How any liberal idiot can support the incumbent who daily tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say is beyond all reasonable people.
See, the thing is about that, you can't point to one single thing Obama has done or said that "tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say".
Whereas with Santorum, he can't shut up about how few rights he thinks women have!
Well, you've indicated to us that you dont bother reading what we've said.
Name the clause of the Constitution that mentions contraceptives.
How any liberal idiot can support the incumbent who daily tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say is beyond all reasonable people.
See, the thing is about that, you can't point to one single thing Obama has done or said that "tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say".
Whereas with Santorum, he can't shut up about how few rights he thinks women have!
Yes, in fact. I can.
ObamaCare.
See, the thing is about that, you can't point to one single thing Obama has done or said that "tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say".
Whereas with Santorum, he can't shut up about how few rights he thinks women have!
Well, you've indicated to us that you dont bother reading what we've said.
Name the clause of the Constitution that mentions contraceptives.
Meaning what? You think contraception needs to be mentioned in the Constitution before someone has a right to use it?
edit: Do you think ANYTHING needs to be mentioned before we have a right to use it?
Part of the reason that states aren't trying to ban contraceptives is because such an act would be blatantly counter to constitutional jurisprudence. However, that hasn't stopped states entirely. States (and the federal government, for that matter) try to limit access to certain contraceptives in any number of ways. Perhaps most prominent is Mississippi's recent unsuccessful "personhood" amendment, which may have banned (had it been successful) methods of contraception which prevent fertilized eggs from entering the womb.
You folks MUST someday try to clarify your thinking and your misuse of rhetoric.
An abortifacient is not a contraceptive.
Well, you've indicated to us that you dont bother reading what we've said.
Name the clause of the Constitution that mentions contraceptives.
Meaning what? You think contraception needs to be mentioned in the Constitution before someone has a right to use it?
edit: Do you think ANYTHING needs to be mentioned before we have a right to use it?
No. I'm arguing that the Federal government, regardless of what branch, does not have the authority to prevent the States from legislating in areas that the Constitution doesn't prevent them from legislating in.
I really dont think the argument is that difficult to comprehend.
Meaning what? You think contraception needs to be mentioned in the Constitution before someone has a right to use it?
edit: Do you think ANYTHING needs to be mentioned before we have a right to use it?
No. I'm arguing that the Federal government, regardless of what branch, does not have the authority to prevent the States from legislating in areas that the Constitution doesn't prevent them from legislating in.
I really dont think the argument is that difficult to comprehend.
So ... you think our Federal Constitution, nor any State's Constitution, does not prevent any state legislature from banning contraception within that state?
See, the thing is about that, you can't point to one single thing Obama has done or said that "tramples upon what the Constitution plainly DOES say".
Whereas with Santorum, he can't shut up about how few rights he thinks women have!
Yes, in fact. I can.
ObamaCare.
Ah. So is that why so many judges have found it Constitutional.
![]()