They are monopolies! Will Cons believe it?

Time to bust them up and destroy their ability to influence our government and the two crime families.

THEY SAY THAT BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO —

House: Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Google have “monopoly power,” should be split

Blockbuster report calls for beefing up enforcement and aiming for breakups.

KATE COX - 10/7/2020, 4:16 PM
Last June, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law began an in-depth investigation into four major firms—Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. The subcommittee wanted to answer one key question: did Big Tech get big playing by the rules, or does it cheat to stay at the top? After 16 months of hearings, research, and analysis, the panel's findings are out... and the results look really bad for every company involved.

The tech sector does indeed suffer from abuses of "monopoly power," the subcommittee concluded in the mammoth 450-page report (PDF) published late yesterday afternoon.

House: Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Google have “monopoly power,” should be split


Hey Adam Smith (Toddsterpatriot. Flash) what say you?

Will conservatives believe that the far left companies run by the leftist radicals are "monopolies?"

:rofl:
 
Time to bust them up and destroy their ability to influence our government and the two crime families.

THEY SAY THAT BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO —

House: Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Google have “monopoly power,” should be split

Blockbuster report calls for beefing up enforcement and aiming for breakups.

KATE COX - 10/7/2020, 4:16 PM
Last June, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law began an in-depth investigation into four major firms—Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. The subcommittee wanted to answer one key question: did Big Tech get big playing by the rules, or does it cheat to stay at the top? After 16 months of hearings, research, and analysis, the panel's findings are out... and the results look really bad for every company involved.

The tech sector does indeed suffer from abuses of "monopoly power," the subcommittee concluded in the mammoth 450-page report (PDF) published late yesterday afternoon.

House: Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Google have “monopoly power,” should be split


Hey Adam Smith (Toddsterpatriot. Flash) what say you?

What is their market share? Are they monopolies like Microsoft was?
 
Monopoly (noun) "the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service."

Amazon isn't the exclusive purveyor of online shopping

Facebook isn't the only social media channel

Apple doesn't manufacture all (or even most) of the world's smartphones and computers

Google isn't the only search engine.


So, in what way do any of these companies constitute a monopoly?

Stop using logic.
 
Congress could declare me a Catholic if they so wished ... it doesn't make it so.

It truly is the sign of the end times, Gipper of all people with the "well the Govt said so, thus it has to be true".
 
Government monopolies are the worst.

Like the Air Force.
From the report…don’t be dumb forever Adam Smith. When did you become a Fascist?


Although these four corporations differ in important ways,
studying their business practices has revealed common problems.
First, each platform now serves as a gatekeeper over a key
channel of distribution. By controlling access to markets,
these giants can pick winners and losers throughout our
economy. They not only wield tremendous power, but they also
abuse it by charging exorbitant fees, imposing oppressive
contract terms, and extracting valuable data from the people
and businesses that rely on them. Second, each platform uses
its gatekeeper position to maintain its market power. By
controlling the infrastructure of the digital age, they have
surveilled other businesses to identify potential rivals, and
have ultimately bought out, copied, or cut off their
competitive threats. And, finally, these firms have abused
their role as intermediaries to further entrench and expand
their dominance. Whether through self-preferencing, predatory
pricing, or exclusionary conduct, the dominant platforms have
exploited their power in order to become even more dominant.
To put it simply, companies that once were scrappy,
underdog startups that challenged the status quo have become
the kinds of monopolies we last saw in the era of oil barons
and railroad tycoons.
Although these firms have delivered clear
benefits to society, the dominance of Amazon, Apple, Facebook,
and Google has come at a price. These firms typically run the
marketplace while also competing in it
--a position that enables
them to write one set of rules for others, while they play by
another, or to engage in a form of their own private quasi
regulation that is unaccountable to anyone but themselves.
The effects of this significant and durable market power
are costly. The Subcommittee's series of hearings produced
significant evidence that these firms wield their dominance in
ways that erode entrepreneurship, degrade Americans' privacy
online, and undermine the vibrancy of the free and diverse
press. The result is less innovation, fewer choices for
consumers, and a weakened democracy.

Nearly a century ago, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis
wrote: ``We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we
may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we
cannot have both.'' Those words speak to us with great urgency
today.
 
From the report…don’t be dumb forever Adam Smith. When did you become a Fascist?


Although these four corporations differ in important ways,
studying their business practices has revealed common problems.
First, each platform now serves as a gatekeeper over a key
channel of distribution. By controlling access to markets,
these giants can pick winners and losers throughout our
economy. They not only wield tremendous power, but they also
abuse it by charging exorbitant fees, imposing oppressive
contract terms, and extracting valuable data from the people
and businesses that rely on them. Second, each platform uses
its gatekeeper position to maintain its market power. By
controlling the infrastructure of the digital age, they have
surveilled other businesses to identify potential rivals, and
have ultimately bought out, copied, or cut off their
competitive threats. And, finally, these firms have abused
their role as intermediaries to further entrench and expand
their dominance. Whether through self-preferencing, predatory
pricing, or exclusionary conduct, the dominant platforms have
exploited their power in order to become even more dominant.
To put it simply, companies that once were scrappy,
underdog startups that challenged the status quo have become
the kinds of monopolies we last saw in the era of oil barons
and railroad tycoons.
Although these firms have delivered clear
benefits to society, the dominance of Amazon, Apple, Facebook,
and Google has come at a price. These firms typically run the
marketplace while also competing in it
--a position that enables
them to write one set of rules for others, while they play by
another, or to engage in a form of their own private quasi
regulation that is unaccountable to anyone but themselves.
The effects of this significant and durable market power
are costly. The Subcommittee's series of hearings produced
significant evidence that these firms wield their dominance in
ways that erode entrepreneurship, degrade Americans' privacy
online, and undermine the vibrancy of the free and diverse
press. The result is less innovation, fewer choices for
consumers, and a weakened democracy.

Nearly a century ago, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis
wrote: ``We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we
may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we
cannot have both.'' Those words speak to us with great urgency
today.

Wow!

It's even worse than I thought.

What is their market share? Are they monopolies like Microsoft was?
 

Forum List

Back
Top