They're Acting As If Biden Was Elected

[mudwhistle]

Oh, it's on the internet, so it must be true.

Lord.

YES, it MUST be true WHEN YOU'RE SEEING IT HAPPEN. Lord.

Some poll challengers were tossed because they couldn't behave like adults.

Ballot processing begins in Detroit; 2 poll challengers removed

Poll challengers, both Republican and Democrat, were allowed at TCF Center in Detroit Monday. Though counting had not begun, processing was underway.

www.freep.com

One poll watcher wasn't allowed into a station, was a mistake and let back in after brief phone call.

Poll watcher kicked out of voting site calls it illegal. City calls it an honest mistake

Gary Adam Feldman, a Republican poll watcher denied entry to one of several voting locations he visited, called the denial “blatant” and “illegal.”

www.usatoday.com

Y'all need to get better at this.

You're trying to confuse the issue.
The primary beef when it came to poll watchers was in Philly, not Detroit.

There were other issues in Michigan and Wisconsin where they said that Republican votes were being counted as Democrat votes either by the people counting or machines that they claimed had "A Glitch" that seemed to always favor Biden.

 

[colfax_m]

You're trying to confuse the issue.
The primary beef when it came to poll watchers was in Philly, not Detroit.

There were other issues in Michigan and Wisconsin where they said that Republican votes were being counted as Democrat votes either by the people counting or machines that they claimed had "A Glitch" that seemed to always favor Biden.

Y'all are all over the map. Who is "they" and what votes are you talking about?

 

[Faun]

I didn't make anything up.
You're a bold-faced liar.
I'm simply repeating what has been reported and what Biden admitted to.
Biden admitted to interfering in a investigation.
Currently Joe and Hunter Biden are suspects in an investigation in Ukraine over corruption.

This is what you made up:

We do know that Biden bragged that he bribed the Ukrainians to stop investigating his coke-sniffing kid.

That clearly is not what Biden said in the video you provided. Now, you can think for yourself or you can just blindly follow the fake news that tells you otherwise.

There is no investigation which Joe and Hunter are subject to.

Yes there is.....and has been for a years:

"Two years after leaving office, Joe Biden couldn’t resist the temptation last year to brag to an audience of foreign policy specialists about the time as vice president that he strong-armed Ukraine into firing its top prosecutor.​

​

In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.​

​

“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.​

​

“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.​

​

Interviews with a half-dozen senior Ukrainian officials confirm Biden’s account, though they claim the pressure was applied over several months in late 2015 and early 2016, not just six hours of one dramatic day. Whatever the case, Poroshenko and Ukraine’s parliament obliged by ending Shokin’s tenure as prosecutor. Shokin was facing steep criticism in Ukraine, and among some U.S. officials, for not bringing enough corruption prosecutions when he was fired.​

​

But Ukrainian officials tell me there was one crucial piece of information that Biden must have known but didn’t mention to his audience: The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.​

​

U.S. banking records show Hunter Biden’s American-based firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC, received regular transfers into one of its accounts — usually more than $166,000 a month — from Burisma from spring 2014 through fall 2015, during a period when Vice President Biden was the main U.S. official dealing with Ukraine and its tense relations with Russia.​

​

The general prosecutor’s official file for the Burisma probe — shared with me by senior Ukrainian officials — shows prosecutors identified Hunter Biden, business partner Devon Archer and their firm, Rosemont Seneca, as potential recipients of money.​

​

Shokin told me in written answers to questions that, before he was fired as general prosecutor, he had made “specific plans” for the investigation that “included interrogations and other crime-investigation procedures into all members of the executive board, including Hunter Biden.”​

​

He added: “I would like to emphasize the fact that presumption of innocence is a principle in Ukraine” and that he couldn’t describe the evidence further."​

Joe Biden’s 2020 Ukrainian nightmare: A closed probe is revived

Biden persuaded Ukraine to fire its prosecutor while he was investigating a natural gas firm that employed Biden’s son on its board.

thehill.com

​

​

​

Thanks for admitting neither Hunter Biden, nor Burisma, were part of an active investigation when Shokin was fired.

 

[colfax_m]

Yes there is.....and has been for a years:

John Solomon's reporting has been thoroughly debunked as a vehicle for disinformation. His reporting has been relabeled as opinion after he left The Hill due to his dubious reporting and the subtitle denotes that it was just his opinion and not that of the The Hill.

 

[Faun]

Yes there is.....and has been for a years:

John Solomon's reporting has been thoroughly debunked as a vehicle for disinformation. His reporting has been relabeled as opinion after he left The Hill due to his dubious reporting and the subtitle denotes that it was just his opinion and not that of the The Hill.

Solomon's Hill contributions were not relabeled as opinion. Regarding this topic, they were always opinion and always put in The Hill's opinion section.

 

[protectionist]

Did you, or did you just read a conspiracy blog and instantly believe it?

That's how the lib media is telling it now ? We wouldn't know, We don't lower ourselves to watch that crap. I know you LOVE that word "conspiracy" though. Anything you don't like - just call it that.

 

[protectionist]

John Solomon's reporting has been thoroughly debunked as a vehicle for disinformation. His reporting has been relabeled as opinion after he left The Hill due to his dubious reporting and the subtitle denotes that it was just his opinion and not that of the The Hill.

HA HA. I just got through slapping one lib around for using the "conspiracy" card, and here you are with "debunking" - another lib favorite word. You guys don't know how stupid you look.

If you don't like Solomon, that probably means he's top notch.

 

[protectionist]

Don’t believe everything you read on random right wing websites.

What's "random" ?

Here's the do not believe list (most of the time) - NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo, USA Today, Fox News (except for a few shows)

Here's the believe list (mostly) - the First, the Blaze, America's Voice, OAN Encore, Newsmax.

 

[protectionist]

OK, Mr. Mental Illness...Votes for Trump were given to Biden.

Duh!

 

[protectionist]

Look at the cases. With no exception that I know of, Democratic Party lawsuits are to expand access to voting. Republican Party lawsuits are to limit it.

Are Republicans afraid of the people?

Look at the cases. With no exception that I know of, Democratic Party lawsuits are to expand access to voting.

Like these >>
1. "expand access to voting" for illegal aliens, dead people, other ineligibles
2. expand votes to ones that don't exist.
3. And yes, Republican Party lawsuits are to limit it. TO ELIGIBLE, VALID, LEGAL VOTERS.

Without this Republican voter suppression, votes are flying all over the place, for whoever the Democrat scum want to put in office. Right now, it's the filthy traitor Joe Biden, and whore, opportunist, trashbag Kamala Harris.

 

[protectionist]

first he didn't stack anything he filled the positions as they come open stacking would be expanding the numbers on the court like the democrats want to do.
Did you expect him to put some one like barney frank on the court or Reverend AL cocaine Sharpton ? In the past when positions came open liberal president put liberal justices in place as was their choice to do , same for Trump so get over it the court was very liberal for a long time was that also stacking ? No it was not.

Next no they will not take trumps side but will take the side of the law, its almost a give the court wants nothing to do with the election.
blow hole Joe will be our next President but Trump has the right just as Clinton or Joe would to contest some alleged practices that took place that may be fraud, they will not not change the results however because they were very limited and only in a few areas, mostly committed by individuals .

This goes on in most Presidential elections to some extent and is not a big thing unlike how the mob helped Kennedy win in a couple statesback in the day.

Biden won't get in. The courts will rip up this stupid ruse.

 

[protectionist]

Expand access my ass. They expanded the LAWS and used the COURTS to do it. And, it is unconstitutional.

Exactly right. Their PA Supreme court expanded the voting time beyond election day, when they have no right to do that. Only the legislature can do that, AND THEY DON'T.

 

[protectionist]

You accused the left of using the courts to silence people when the opposite is true.

Some people need to speak. Others need to be silenced. Those who are perpetrating FRAUD.

 

[mudwhistle]

Yes there is.....and has been for a years:

John Solomon's reporting has been thoroughly debunked as a vehicle for disinformation. His reporting has been relabeled as opinion after he left The Hill due to his dubious reporting and the subtitle denotes that it was just his opinion and not that of the The Hill.

Yeah...right....sure....uh-huh

 

[colfax_m]

Some people need to speak. Others need to be silenced. Those who are perpetrating FRAUD.

Nope. Trying to silence the voice of Americans who have done nothing more than attempt to exercise their right to vote in our country's great elections and to eliminate the votes of some Americans who did nothing wrong while casting their votes.

 

[colfax_m]

Here's the believe list (mostly) - the First, the Blaze, America's Voice, OAN Encore, Newsmax.

I wouldn't. Those are some pretty dodgy websites.

 

[protectionist]

Biden was elected. Get over it, crybaby. Republicans are such pathetic sore losers lol

HA HA HA. You don't bother to read the thread before you post, right idiot ?

 

[protectionist]

Nope. Trying to silence the voice of Americans who have done nothing more than attempt to exercise their right to vote in our country's great elections and to eliminate the votes of some Americans who did nothing wrong while casting their votes.

I was referring to silencing the scammers breaking laws, who need to get silenced & stopped, by being put in JAIL.

 

[colfax_m]

I was referring to silencing the scammers breaking laws, who need to get silenced & stopped, by being put in JAIL.

If they can find evidence of that, go ahead. But a lot of their efforts are to narrow the ability for people to vote legally and sometimes have requested ballots be thrown out even though the people who cast them did nothing wrong.

For example, a person votes by mail in Philly. They do everything right. Then Trump's lawyers say they didn't have enough access to observe that vote being counted so they demand it be thrown out. That's wrong, in my opinion.

 

[protectionist]

I wouldn't. Those are some pretty dodgy websites.

How would YOU know ? Watch out - there could be a quiz.