This Election Was Not Stolen, Do You Accept That Fact?

And I’d bet if I felt like searching McConnell was not the first one to have ever done that.
So? So do you support it all those times and this time, too? Just some of the times,, but you are about to call someone else a hypocrite for doing EXACTLY THAT anyway? Make a damn point.
 
I remember the OJ Simpson trial, where he was found not guilty. But there's quite a few people today who still believe he wasn't innocent of murdering his wife and the guy she was with, but they couldn't or didn't prove otherwise. Same deal with the 2020 election results, at the time insufficient evidence was found that would justify not certifying the election and so those involved in that process did what they had to do.

Some people claim that the certification process proves there was no fraud, or at least insufficient fraud to prove the election was stolen. But to me, the certification process merely indicates that they didn't have the justification to do anything else. IOW, what happened then did not prove the election was legit; maybe it was stolen and maybe not, but the certification process proves nothing. Just like Simpson's 'Not Guilty" verdict does not mean he was innocent.
Do you know what has to be done in the certification process, in order to be able to certify an election? The checks and balances, to certify? There is no way to steal an election for president anymore....the checks in place will catch it and any funny business going on.

Please task, you are a ret. USAF guy, not drafted Army. You're suppose to be the brains of the different military services...?

You can't ballot stuff absentee voting, it'll be caught through checks.

You can't electronically change in person voting, it'll be caught, through paper trails now in place and any recount.

You can't have more votes, than legit registered voters.

You can't have more absentee ballots, than the number of voters that requested an absentee ballot.

And so so so many other checks in place that have to balance at the voting precinct level.... There just is no way possible for massive voter fraud to take place....we have been the shining star and envy of the whole world on our voting process and security checks... Small cheating like voting for a recently dead wife could happen but will be caught e entually, but massive voter fraud is not possible, without being caught.

Till y'all decided to blaspheme our sacred system, as if we were running a banana republic system..... Which is a disgrace and shameful, for what you and your lying ilk leaders and political cronies have done to us to make us and our nation look like retards and idiots....

All because you are ignorant of election processes and how they are run, and certified...

and your lying ilk republicans, counted on your ignorance for them to try to pull this bull shit scam of theirs off.

It's disheartening to watch.... :(
 
Do you know what has to be done in the certification process, in order to be able to certify an election? The checks and balances, to certify? There is no way to steal an election for president anymore....the checks in place will catch it and any funny business going on.

Please task, you are a ret. USAF guy, not drafted Army. You're suppose to be the brains of the different military services...?

You can't ballot stuff absentee voting, it'll be caught through checks.

You can't electronically change in person voting, it'll be caught, through paper trails now in place and any recount.

You can't have more votes, than legit registered voters.

You can't have more absentee ballots, than the number of voters that requested an absentee ballot.

And so so so many other checks in place that have to balance at the voting precinct level.... There just is no way possible for massive voter fraud to take place....we have been the shining star and envy of the whole world on our voting process and security checks... Small cheating like voting for a recently dead wife could happen but will be caught e entually, but massive voter fraud is not possible, without being caught.

Till y'all decided to blaspheme our sacred system, as if we were running a banana republic system..... Which is a disgrace and shameful, for what you and your lying ilk leaders and political cronies have done to us to make us and our nation look like retards and idiots....

All because you are ignorant of election processes and how they are run, and certified...

and your lying ilk republicans, counted on your ignorance for them to try to pull this bull shit scam of theirs off.

It's disheartening to watch.... :(
But, but, they have 400 voter suppression bills pretending all those things are going on. 🤪
 
But, but, they have 400 voter suppression bills pretending all those things are going on. 🤪
And THAT'S the con. Talk about "Deep State". 100+ of elected reps glued to the Big Lie, all for cover for stealing elections in the future.

All glued to the lie for personal gain, all useful idiots in the real con.
 
Do you know what has to be done in the certification process, in order to be able to certify an election? The checks and balances, to certify? There is no way to steal an election for president anymore....the checks in place will catch it and any funny business going on.

Please task, you are a ret. USAF guy, not drafted Army. You're suppose to be the brains of the different military services...?

You can't ballot stuff absentee voting, it'll be caught through checks.

You can't electronically change in person voting, it'll be caught, through paper trails now in place and any recount.

You can't have more votes, than legit registered voters.

You can't have more absentee ballots, than the number of voters that requested an absentee ballot.

And so so so many other checks in place that have to balance at the voting precinct level.... There just is no way possible for massive voter fraud to take place....we have been the shining star and envy of the whole world on our voting process and security checks... Small cheating like voting for a recently dead wife could happen but will be caught e entually, but massive voter fraud is not possible, without being caught.

Till y'all decided to blaspheme our sacred system, as if we were running a banana republic system..... Which is a disgrace and shameful, for what you and your lying ilk leaders and political cronies have done to us to make us and our nation look like retards and idiots....

All because you are ignorant of election processes and how they are run, and certified...

and your lying ilk republicans, counted on your ignorance for them to try to pull this bull shit scam of theirs off.

It's disheartening to watch.... :(
Chain of custody was never validated before certification. That is a check and balance they missed.

 
You did not answer my question. Maricopa County fought them every way possible. losing in court was the only thing that let it happen. Dominion is still withholding administrator access to data. Why?
It doesn't matter if the county fought them, they still turned over every ballot and every ballot was inspected and counted; and in the end, that increased Biden's lead.

And that eats you up.
 
Chain of custody was never validated before certification. That is a check and balance they missed.

Yes, it was validated...

This is how embarrassing Trump’s ‘fraud’ claims have gotten

And here, none is warranted. This “Chain of Custody” claim being made by Trump stems from a report by a pro-Trump website called Georgia Star News. It’s part of a group of sites established to mimic local news coverage but largely promoting stories friendly to the right. The author of the DeKalb County story, for example, writes for “The Georgia Star News, The Tennessee Star, The Ohio Star and The Arizona Sun Times,” which must yield her a ton of mileage reimbursements.

The claim is this: People hired to transport ballots from drop boxes to the county were mandated to do so immediately, but sometimes those ballots weren’t logged by the county until hours later or the next day. This is shown in documents obtained by the website that purportedly show the transfer of the ballots. (It’s worth noting, by the way, that when the site asked for these documents in November, the county’s failure to turn them over at that point spurred a story about how the documents might not exist. They did, as CNN quickly determined.)

This is a good example of the ways in which the complicated process of running elections opens up all sorts of opportunity to inject procedural complaints. The story does not suggest that any votes were altered in any way, if such a thing were possible without detection. It does not indicate that anyone had talked to the county about why the forms might have been incomplete (in some cases) or indicated gaps between collection and being logged. There’s nothing to suggest that this was anything other than, say, a team collecting ballots at the end of the day and finishing the job the following morning. There’s obviously good reason for ballots to be transmitted as quickly as possible, but there’s nothing to suggest this was anything more nefarious than campaign workers doing their jobs a bit less assiduously than one might hope.
 
It doesn't matter if the county fought them, they still turned over every ballot and every ballot was inspected and counted; and in the end, that increased Biden's lead.

And that eats you up.
They found 30 laws broken and enough ballots to over turn the election. The AG. is sitting on the evidence. Fact.
 
Yes, it was validated...

And here, none is warranted. This “Chain of Custody” claim being made by Trump stems from a report by a pro-Trump website called Georgia Star News. It’s part of a group of sites established to mimic local news coverage but largely promoting stories friendly to the right. The author of the DeKalb County story, for example, writes for “The Georgia Star News, The Tennessee Star, The Ohio Star and The Arizona Sun Times,” which must yield her a ton of mileage reimbursements.
The claim is this: People hired to transport ballots from drop boxes to the county were mandated to do so immediately, but sometimes those ballots weren’t logged by the county until hours later or the next day. This is shown in documents obtained by the website that purportedly show the transfer of the ballots. (It’s worth noting, by the way, that when the site asked for these documents in November, the county’s failure to turn them over at that point spurred a story about how the documents might not exist. They did, as CNN quickly determined.)
This is a good example of the ways in which the complicated process of running elections opens up all sorts of opportunity to inject procedural complaints. The story does not suggest that any votes were altered in any way, if such a thing were possible without detection. It does not indicate that anyone had talked to the county about why the forms might have been incomplete (in some cases) or indicated gaps between collection and being logged. There’s nothing to suggest that this was anything other than, say, a team collecting ballots at the end of the day and finishing the job the following morning. There’s obviously good reason for ballots to be transmitted as quickly as possible, but there’s nothing to suggest this was anything more nefarious than campaign workers doing their jobs a bit less assiduously than one might hope.
The WP?
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top